Ad- Hoc Networks for Independent Living (value added sensing) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ad hoc networks for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ad- Hoc Networks for Independent Living (value added sensing) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ad- Hoc Networks for Independent Living (value added sensing) Pawel Gburzynski Olsonet Communications, Ottawa, Canada University of Alberta, Computing Science, Edmonton, AB, Canada (emeritus) Vistula University, Warsaw, Poland May


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ad-Hoc Networks for …

… Independent Living

Pawel Gburzynski

1 May 2017

Olsonet Communications, Ottawa, Canada University of Alberta, Computing Science, Edmonton, AB, Canada (emeritus) Vistula University, Warsaw, Poland

(value added sensing)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Militza (Brugges)

May 2017 2

collaboration with Alphatronics, Belgium

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Annonciaden (Antwerp)

May 2017 3

collaboration with Alphatronics, Belgium

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What to sense?

4 May 2017

the abominable panic button local remote control location independence monitoring tracking simplicity acceleration position movement LF-loops … RSS

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Alphanet highlights

5 May 2017

true Ad-Hoc (as opposed to sensor-to-access-point) flexible, proprietary semi-infrastructure integrated, virtual development platform

mobility, e.g., trips, field events (system on the road) ISM band, ≠ BT, ≠ ZigBee, ≠ WiFi complete, authoritative, virtual development and testing

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Alphanet highlights

6 May 2017

slide-7
SLIDE 7

TARP

7 May 2017

the ubiquitous, network-wide communication scheme: selective, cache-driven flooding (re-casting)

A B slack = 1

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The forwarder’s dilemma

8 May 2017

❖ where should I forward the packet? ❖ how can I learn the identity of the next node on the path? ❖ how do I make sure to know that identity at all times?

?

P-P

❖ should I transmit (broadcast) the packet? ❖ will I help when I do that? ❖ won’t my assistance be redundant?

TARP

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Tags and Pegs

9 May 2017

Tags Pegs the same low end hardware base for all device types, e.g., CC430 by TI:

4K RAM simple ISM RF module typical rate: 38.4 kbps low energy

slide-10
SLIDE 10

May 2017 10

The praxis: Tags & Pegs

Tags implement some end functionality, e.g., sensing; a Tag can be mobile Pegs act as semi-infrastructure (e.g., static, devoid of sensors/actuators, used solely for communication) Pegs can be used as reference, e.g., for location tracking (those that do not move) Pegs can be powered from external sources, while Tags are battery powered everybody can forward, if needed (flexible roles)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

May 2017 11

Praxis development: PicOS

slide-12
SLIDE 12

May 2017 12

Praxis development: VUE2

Virtual Underlay Execution Engine

(an authoritative emulator for complete praxes)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

May 2017 13

Praxis development: VUE2

Virtual Underlay Execution Engine

(an authoritative emulator for complete praxes)

the praxis

slide-14
SLIDE 14

May 2017 14

Indoor location tracking

based solely on crude RSS, yet surprisingly accurate (for the task at hand)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

May 2017 15

Pegs as anchors

direct transformation of RSS into distance doesn’t work (subtler correlation is needed) we can afford many Pegs (redundant coverage doesn’t pollute the RF channel) profiling: manual, automated, hinted (by

  • ther

location indicators, e.g., LF loop sensors, chargers)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

May 2017 16

Location bursts

series of 32 short packets transmitted at increasing power levels (in groups of 4): . . .

PL 0 PL 1 PL 7

Pegs receive what they can and forward the corresponding RSS vectors to the OSS

slide-17
SLIDE 17

May 2017 17

A sample

# loc 1'0'2, att 5 "23-Apr-2017 19:59:03” 3 0 61 68 77 90 95 4 0 57 66 76 85 94 105 112 5 0 60 70 79 88 96 108 115 6 74 83 92 102 111 119 131 138 7 82 89 99 109 118 125 137 145 8 75 84 93 102 111 119 132 138 9 82 91 100 109 119 126 139 145 11 0 69 77 85 97 104 12 0 60 73 80 P0 P7

Peg power level

P1 …

slide-18
SLIDE 18

May 2017 18

Like RFID/ranging combo

low power levels have priority; this way closeness to a Peg tends to result in a good estimate allows for sparse coverage in areas where tolerance can be afforded: no need to be close to a Peg for a “reasonably good” estimate history option, i.e., tracking versus (infrequent, on- demand locating)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

May 2017 19

A few numbers

practical accuracy (on-demand [alarm] mode): 90%+

for what they are worth

recommended coverage: 1.5 Pegs per “location” energy budget (Tag): ca. 4 mAs per burst: 1 b/h  1.2 uA extra current drain, idle current: ca. 3 uA, 1 event/h  20 years on a 1 Ah (3 V) battery RF range: 100 m ballpark in

  • pen

air (minimal antennas), 10-50 m in a building, depending on wall type …

slide-20
SLIDE 20

May 2017 20

That’s it