Corridor Routing Routing in Mobile in Mobile Ad Ad- -hoc hoc - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

corridor routing routing in mobile in mobile ad ad hoc
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Corridor Routing Routing in Mobile in Mobile Ad Ad- -hoc hoc - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Corridor Routing Routing in Mobile in Mobile Ad Ad- -hoc hoc Networks Networks Corridor Christian Vogt, University of Karlsruhe Michael Gerharz, University of Bonn Christian de Waal, University of Bonn Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #1

Corridor Corridor Routing Routing in Mobile in Mobile Ad Ad-

  • hoc

hoc Networks Networks

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey

Christian Vogt, University of Karlsruhe Michael Gerharz, University of Bonn Christian de Waal, University of Bonn

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #2

Overview Overview

Advantages of Multi-Path Routing Existing Multi-Path Protocols Corridor Routing Simulation Results and Analysis Conclusion and Future Work

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #3

Advantages of Advantages of Multi Multi-

  • Path

Path Routing Routing

Bottleneck Circumvention

Choosing paths with low traffic

Efficient Bandwidth Usage

Disperse traffic over multiple paths

Reduced Destination Discovery Frequency

Reducing signaling overhead

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #4

Existing Existing Multi Multi-

  • Path

Path Protocols Protocols

S Split plit M Multi ulti-

  • Path

Path R Routing

  • uting, SMR

Das, Marina: "On-Demand Multipath Distance Vector Routing in Ad-hoc Networks," IEEE ICNP, Nov. 2001.

A Ad d-

  • hoc

hoc O On n-

  • demand

demand M Multi ulti-

  • Path

Path D Distance istance V Vector ector Routing Routing, AOMDV Disjoint paths Paths of different length Limit on number of routes Unicast Route Reply messages

Gerla, Lee: "Split Multipath Routing with Maximally Disjoint Paths in Ad- hoc Networks," IEEE ICM, June 2001.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #5

Corridor Corridor Routing Routing

Paths may overlap

  • verlap

Paths are minimum minimum-hop Number of routes unlimited unlimited

  • Broadcast

Broadcast Route Reply messages Disjoint paths Paths of different length Limit on number of routes Unicast Route Reply messages Corridor Routing Existing MP Protocols Source Destination Corridor Corridor

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #6

Destination Discovery Destination Discovery

Route Route Request Request message message… … is flooded flooded into the network holds a Hops-to-Source field Route Route Reply Reply message message… … is regionally regionally broadcasted broadcasted along the corridor holds a Hops-to-Destination field holds a Total-Hops field Source Destination

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #7

Destination Discovery (2) Destination Discovery (2)

Source Destination

Intermediate router is on a minimum-hop path ⇔ Hops-to-Source + Hops-to-Destination = Total-Hops

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #8

Simulation Simulation Results Results and Analysis and Analysis

Network Simulator 2 50 Mobile Nodes 50 m Transmission Range 300x60 m2 Movement Area

∅ 2 ∼ 7 m/s Movement Speed

DSR, AODV, and Corridor Routing Protocol (CRP CRP) at L3 IEEE 802.11b at L2 VoIP, 12.2 kbps (AMR Codec) 60s Call Holding Time 1 ∼ 6 Parallel Calls

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #9

Datagram Datagram Delivery Ratio Delivery Ratio

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #10

Routing Routing Failure Failure Ratio Ratio

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #11

Destination Discovery Destination Discovery Frequency Frequency

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #12

More More Analysis Analysis

Datagram Delivery Ratio Routing Failure Ratio Destination Discovery Frequency

  • Datagram

Datagram Delivery Delivery Delay Delay

  • Buffer Overflow Ratio

Buffer Overflow Ratio

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #13

Conclusion Conclusion and Future and Future Work Work

Corridor Routing

Use of All Minimum-Hop Paths Unlimited Number of Paths Paths are Not Necessarily Disjoint

Performance

Increased Packet Delivery Ratio Reduced Destination Discovery Frequency Adverse Impact of Routing Failures

Future Work

Comparison to Multi-Path Protocols

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #14

Corridor Corridor Routing Routing in Mobile in Mobile Ad Ad-

  • hoc

hoc Networks Networks

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey

Christian Vogt, chvogt@tm.uka.de Michael Gerharz, gerharz@cs.uni-bonn.de Christian de Waal, dewaal@cs.uni-bonn.de

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #15

Corridor Corridor Routing Routing in Mobile in Mobile Ad Ad-

  • hoc

hoc Networks Networks

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey

Christian Vogt, chvogt@tm.uka.de Michael Gerharz, gerharz@cs.uni-bonn.de Christian de Waal, dewaal@cs.uni-bonn.de Supplementary Supplementary Presentation Presentation

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #16

9.91 16.91 9.95 5 10 15 20 DSR AODV CRP

Destination Discovery Destination Discovery Frequency Frequency

Why Why are are there there so so many many? ? per per Call Call (60 (60 seconds seconds) )

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #17

Analysis: Analysis: Loss Loss of

  • f Reply

Reply Messages Messages

Reply messages are broadcasts broadcasts Broadcasts are unprotected unprotected by acknowledgements Increased risk for collision collision Some discoveries terminate terminate prematurely

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #18

R e p l y R e p l y R e p l y R e p l y

Solution: Solution: Propagation Propagation Monitoring Monitoring S Y X D

X broadcasts broadcasts Reply X listens whether Y propagates propagates If Y does not propagate, X re re-

  • transmits

transmits

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Med-Hoc-Net 2004, Bodrum, Turkey, #19

Destination Discovery Destination Discovery Frequency Frequency, , revisited revisited

per per Call Call (60 (60 seconds seconds) )

9.91 16.91 9.95 5.62 5 10 15 20 DSR AODV CRP CRP-PM