action research two methodology sources to document
play

Action Research : Two methodology sources to document effective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Action Research : Two methodology sources to document effective teaching and student learning Manda J Williamson, PhD Associate Professor of Practice The Department of Psychology, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln Deans Instructor for the


  1. Action Research : Two methodology sources to document effective teaching and student learning Manda J Williamson, PhD Associate Professor of Practice The Department of Psychology, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln Dean’s Instructor for the CAS Teaching Academy Chair-Elect, CAS Teaching Academy Fellow, Vice Chancellor’s Student Success Program mwilliamson3@unl.edu Fall Teaching & Learning Symposium Nebraska Innovation Campus Conference Center 2:45 – 3:45, October 19, 2018

  2. An An Overview: What is “Ac Action Research”? Scholarly Teaching Action Research/ “SoTL” 6. Shared 2. Informs 1. Learning 3. Hypothesis- 5. Peer 4. Design 2. May be 1. Informs 3. Peer with classroom is DV Driven Reviewed; Rigor Shared classroom Reviewed Broader practice Critically within a practice Community; Evaluated restricted Is Public; Is community used by Colleagues

  3. The Process Evaluate, Scrutinize Implement, Develop The Collect Question Data Design See if it’s

  4. Scrutinize: Discover er the the Ques uesti tion • Theory • Observation • Schwab (1973): Someone teaching something to someone else somewhere

  5. Develop a Question : Common Common Qu Question ons Someone Someone Else • “What is going on when?” • “How comfortable are my students with me when________?” • “What is?” “What do my students think about how I • • “What works?” ___________ with them?” • “What is Possible” • “Does this thing assist these learners?” Something Somewhere • “How do I apply this theory of learning?” • “Does this work in this room?” • “How good is this assignment?” • “Within this College?” • “What do my students think about how I • “On this campus?” ___________ with them?” • “In this part of the country?”

  6. Develop a Question: An Annotated Bi Bibliog ography • https://researchsotl.wordpress.com/table-of-contents/

  7. Develop a Question : : Specific Examples • Does collaborative learning improve retention? J • Does using a test bank improve retention? • Does highlighting work better than what ever they are doing when they read text? • Do concept maps foster deeper encoding (enable students to see relationships between concepts)? • Can I restructure a course using recommendations from efficacy theory to build student confidence and foster greater retention?

  8. See if It’s Been Done • Do a lit search • UNL Libraries • Scholar.Google.Com • Summarize the important ones • Add to them

  9. See if It’s Been Done SoTL TL Jo Jour urna nals s tha hat are Disc scipl pline ne-Sp Speci cific • http://www.fctl.ucf.edu/Researc hAndScholarship/SoTL/journals/ • (has acceptance rates listed) • https://belmont.libguides.com/c .php?g=174362&p=1149193 • https://cetl.kennesaw.edu/teach ing-journals-directory

  10. Design Your Procedure • Important guidelines • Measure Twice to Establish Learning • NuGrant Approval • Include Quantitative AND Qualitative Data • PILOT!!!!

  11. Designs: Using ”Think-Pair-Share (Th-P-SH)”

  12. Designs: Using Th-P-SH as the Intervention

  13. Designs: Using Th-P-SH as the Intervention

  14. Designs: Using Th-P-SH as the Intervention

  15. Designs: Establishing Group Equivalency within a Class FMI: NSF User-friendly Handbook for Mixed Method Evaluations https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf9 7153 Prior Sections without intervention: control classroom, class time, teacher, materials Obtain class rank and ACT data and demonstrate equivalency

  16. Design Your Procedure: “Assessment” should include two types • “Assess” • Example 1: Objective-to show that “it” worked • Example 2: Subjective (Affective/Motivation) Evaluations of Progress to show why students thought “It” worked • Quantitative and Qualitative Measures

  17. Design: Em Empl ployi ying ng Mi Mixed Me Method od D Designs (q (qualitative and quantitative data) • https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1997 /nsf97153/start.htm

  18. Do Any Exi Exist? t? Possibl ble e sc scales s to use se when eng engag aged ed in in the the scho holar larship hip of teac eaching hing • http://teachpsych.org/Resources /Documents/ebooks/compscales stl.pdf

  19. An And if you don’t wish to purchase a text.. • Vanderbilt University, “Scholarship of Teaching and Learning” • https://my.vanderbilt.edu/sotl/ • University of Calgary, “A Scholarly Approach to Teaching” • http://sotl.ucalgaryblogs.ca/under standing-sotl/a-scholarly- approach-to-teaching/

  20. Let’s Try Th This… … Please Open Th This Link to Your Go Google le Do Doc: c: • https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yCp3995 MET3dB6HYsRAqo3VufVpR9BoC2T3P- okq9io/edit?usp=sharing

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend