Action Research : Two methodology sources to document effective - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

action research two methodology sources to document
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Action Research : Two methodology sources to document effective - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Action Research : Two methodology sources to document effective teaching and student learning Manda J Williamson, PhD Associate Professor of Practice The Department of Psychology, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln Deans Instructor for the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Action Research: Two methodology sources to document effective teaching and student learning

Manda J Williamson, PhD Associate Professor of Practice The Department of Psychology, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln Dean’s Instructor for the CAS Teaching Academy Chair-Elect, CAS Teaching Academy Fellow, Vice Chancellor’s Student Success Program mwilliamson3@unl.edu

Fall Teaching & Learning Symposium Nebraska Innovation Campus Conference Center 2:45 – 3:45, October 19, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

An An Overview: What is “Ac Action Research”?

Action Research/ “SoTL”

  • 1. Learning

is DV

  • 2. Informs

classroom practice

  • 4. Design

Rigor

  • 3. Hypothesis-

Driven

  • 5. Peer

Reviewed; Critically Evaluated

  • 6. Shared

with Broader Community; Is Public; Is used by Colleagues

Scholarly Teaching

  • 1. Informs

classroom practice

  • 2. May be

Shared within a restricted community

  • 3. Peer

Reviewed

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Process

Scrutinize

Develop The Question

See if it’s Design Collect Data Evaluate, Implement,

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Scrutinize: Discover er the the Ques uesti tion

  • Theory
  • Observation
  • Schwab (1973): Someone teaching

something to someone else somewhere

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Develop a Question: Common Common Qu Question

  • ns

Someone

  • “How do I apply this theory of learning?”
  • “How good is this assignment?”
  • “What do my students think about how I

___________ with them?”

Someone Else

  • “What is going on when?”
  • “What is?”
  • “What works?”
  • “What is Possible”
  • “Does this thing assist these learners?”

Something

  • “How comfortable are my students with me

when________?”

  • “What do my students think about how I

___________ with them?”

Somewhere

  • “Does this work in this room?”
  • “Within this College?”
  • “On this campus?”
  • “In this part of the country?”
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Develop a Question: An Annotated Bi Bibliog

  • graphy
  • https://researchsotl.wordpress.com/table-of-contents/
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Develop a Question: : Specific Examples

  • Does collaborative learning improve retention? J
  • Does using a test bank improve retention?
  • Does highlighting work better than what ever they are doing when

they read text?

  • Do concept maps foster deeper encoding (enable students to see

relationships between concepts)?

  • Can I restructure a course using recommendations from efficacy

theory to build student confidence and foster greater retention?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

See if It’s Been Done

  • Do a lit search
  • UNL Libraries
  • Scholar.Google.Com
  • Summarize the important ones
  • Add to them
slide-9
SLIDE 9

See if It’s Been Done SoTL TL Jo Jour urna nals s tha hat are Disc scipl pline ne-Sp Speci cific

  • http://www.fctl.ucf.edu/Researc

hAndScholarship/SoTL/journals/

  • (has acceptance rates listed)
  • https://belmont.libguides.com/c

.php?g=174362&p=1149193

  • https://cetl.kennesaw.edu/teach

ing-journals-directory

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Design Your Procedure

  • Important guidelines
  • Measure Twice to Establish Learning
  • NuGrant Approval
  • Include Quantitative AND Qualitative Data
  • PILOT!!!!
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Designs: Using ”Think-Pair-Share (Th-P-SH)”

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Designs: Using Th-P-SH as the Intervention

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Designs: Using Th-P-SH as the Intervention

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Designs: Using Th-P-SH as the Intervention

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Designs: Establishing Group Equivalency within a Class

FMI: NSF User-friendly Handbook for Mixed Method Evaluations https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf9 7153 Prior Sections without intervention: control classroom, class time, teacher, materials Obtain class rank and ACT data and demonstrate equivalency

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Design Your Procedure: “Assessment” should include two types

  • “Assess”
  • Example 1: Objective-to show that “it” worked
  • Example 2: Subjective (Affective/Motivation) Evaluations
  • f Progress to show why students thought “It” worked
  • Quantitative and Qualitative Measures
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Design: Em Empl ployi ying ng Mi Mixed Me Method

  • d D

Designs (q (qualitative and quantitative data)

  • https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1997

/nsf97153/start.htm

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Do Any Exi Exist? t? Possibl ble e sc scales s to use se when eng engag aged ed in in the the scho holar larship hip of teac eaching hing

  • http://teachpsych.org/Resources

/Documents/ebooks/compscales stl.pdf

slide-20
SLIDE 20

An And if you don’t wish to purchase a text..

  • Vanderbilt University,

“Scholarship of Teaching and Learning”

  • https://my.vanderbilt.edu/sotl/
  • University of Calgary, “A

Scholarly Approach to Teaching”

  • http://sotl.ucalgaryblogs.ca/under

standing-sotl/a-scholarly- approach-to-teaching/

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Let’s Try Th This… … Please Open Th This Link to Your Go Google le Do Doc: c:

  • https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yCp3995

MET3dB6HYsRAqo3VufVpR9BoC2T3P-

  • kq9io/edit?usp=sharing