Acceptance and Use of Simple Mobile Services - Preliminary Results - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

acceptance and use of simple mobile services preliminary
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Acceptance and Use of Simple Mobile Services - Preliminary Results - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Acceptance and Use of Simple Mobile Services - Preliminary Results and Perspectives Gregor Broll 1 , Richard Walker 2 , Margarita Patesti 3 , Sebastian Boring 1 1 Media Informatics Group, University of Munich, Germany 2 XiWrite Srl, Italy 3 Athens


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Acceptance and Use of Simple Mobile Services - Preliminary Results and Perspectives

Gregor Broll1, Richard Walker2, Margarita Patesti3, Sebastian Boring1

1 Media Informatics Group, University of Munich, Germany 2 XiWrite Srl, Italy 3 Athens International Airport, Greece

Workshop on Mobile Internet User Experience @ MobileHCI 2007

Singapore September 9, 2007

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Gregor Broll et al., MobileInternetUX, Singapore, 9th September,2007 2/8

The SMS Project

  • Simple Mobile Services (European IST project)
  • Goal: Provision of innovative tools enabling a new class
  • f mobile services => simple to find, simple to use,

simple to trust, simple to set up

  • Creation and provision of mobile services as easy as

creating a regular website

  • Strong focus on users’ experiences of mobile services

and their expectations for the future

  • Preliminary evaluation of mobile service usage through

focus groups

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Gregor Broll et al., MobileInternetUX, Singapore, 9th September,2007 3/8

Setup of the Focus Groups

  • Italy, University Tor Vergata:
  • Students of telecommunications engineering
  • 10 male, 2 female, age 22 to 26, mean age 24,8
  • Italy, XiWrite (company):
  • High school students
  • 5 male, 3 female, age 15 to 20, mean age 17,4
  • Germany, LMU University
  • Students of computer sciences
  • 6 male, 3 female, age 22 to 30, mean age 24,7
  • Greece, Athens International Airport
  • Mixed professionals working at the airport
  • 6 male, 5 female, age 29 to 46, mean age 36,2
  • Subjects were introduced to SMS (video) and

were asked questions about several topics

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Gregor Broll et al., MobileInternetUX, Singapore, 9th September,2007 4/8

Results: Commonalities

  • Overall evaluation highly positive.
  • All participants would be willing to try the product, (if free)
  • A large majority would accept a service funded by advertising (so long as

the advertising was not too intrusive)

  • User interface popular
  • All the groups concerned about privacy
  • Risk of dependency
  • What do I do if I loose my phone?
  • If the battery runs out?
  • If it breaks?
  • If there is no coverage?
  • (solutions to these issues very important for take-up)
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Gregor Broll et al., MobileInternetUX, Singapore, 9th September,2007 5/8

Results: Differences

  • Consequences for human interaction
  • Greek group and Italian groups very concerned
  • “We don’t want to communicate always by machine”
  • “If I want to ask directions, I like to ask the ice-cream man – it creates an opportunity

for communication”

  • German group less concerned
  • Motivation
  • Greek group (professionals): Save time, access information more quickly
  • Other groups (students): Fashion, “coolness”
  • Willingness to pay
  • Italian groups: Euro 15-20/month (engineers), Euro 40/month (high school students) !!!!!
  • German group: Not precise – but much lower. One user suggested Euro 3/month
  • Greek group: SMS should be free – should not be purely commercial
  • Where discussed most participants willing to accept advertising
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Gregor Broll et al., MobileInternetUX, Singapore, 9th September,2007 6/8

Segmenting the user population

Willingness to Pay Technology Acceptance Practical and worried Technophiles Fashion makers

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Gregor Broll et al., MobileInternetUX, Singapore, 9th September,2007 7/8

Open issues

  • End user scenarios
  • Over-emphasis on students
  • Not enough professionals
  • Under-representation of lower educated groups (or groups with no technical background)
  • Under-representation of older age groups
  • Under-representation of women
  • Can we organize new focus groups for these users?
  • Developer focus groups
  • Currently have no groups for developers
  • Focus on authoring – will not be done in 2.1
  • Implications for business scenarios
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Gregor Broll et al., MobileInternetUX, Singapore, 9th September,2007 8/8

Questions? Thank You!

gregor.broll@ifi.lmu.de www.ist-sms.org