Salem County Cross- - Salem County Cross Acceptance Acceptance - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
salem county cross salem county cross acceptance
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Salem County Cross- - Salem County Cross Acceptance Acceptance - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 01, 2023 390 likes •576 views

Salem County Cross- - Salem County Cross Acceptance Acceptance Public Meeting Public Meeting April 17, 2007 April 17, 2007 Cross- -Acceptance Acceptance Cross Process to Obtain Input on State Plan From Counties Process to Obtain

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Salem County Cross Salem County Cross-

  • Acceptance

Acceptance

Public Meeting Public Meeting April 17, 2007 April 17, 2007

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cross Cross-

  • Acceptance

Acceptance

  • Process to Obtain Input on State Plan From Counties

Process to Obtain Input on State Plan From Counties & Municipalities & Municipalities

  • Addresses Policy Issues & State Plan Policy Map

Addresses Policy Issues & State Plan Policy Map

  • Meetings Regarding All 21 Counties

Meetings Regarding All 21 Counties

  • Input From All State Departments & Agencies

Input From All State Departments & Agencies

  • Extensive Meetings Before Tonight

Extensive Meetings Before Tonight

  • Internal Meeting At OSG

Internal Meeting At OSG

  • Inter

Inter-

  • agency Meeting with All Relevant State Agencies

agency Meeting with All Relevant State Agencies

  • Staff

Staff-

  • to

to-

  • Staff Meeting with County Planning Staff

Staff Meeting with County Planning Staff

  • Final Public Meeting

Final Public Meeting

  • No Final Decisions on Policies Before End of Process

No Final Decisions on Policies Before End of Process

  • We Are Hear to Listen to County

We Are Hear to Listen to County’ ’s Interests s Interests

slide-3
SLIDE 3

County Negotiations County Negotiations

  • Preliminary State Plan Map

Preliminary State Plan Map

  • County Submissions for Proposed Changes

County Submissions for Proposed Changes

  • Statement of Agreements & Disagreements

Statement of Agreements & Disagreements

  • Negotiation Agenda

Negotiation Agenda

  • Final Resolution of Agreements &

Final Resolution of Agreements & Disagreements Disagreements

  • Summary of Staff

Summary of Staff-

  • to

to-

  • Staff Meeting

Staff Meeting

  • Public Hearing

Public Hearing

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

The State Plan Policy Map The State Plan Policy Map

  • Graphic Depiction of State

Graphic Depiction of State Plan Policies Regarding Plan Policies Regarding Growth & Preservation Growth & Preservation

  • Five Planning Areas

Five Planning Areas

  • Deal with Diversity of

Deal with Diversity of Planning Goals Planning Goals

  • Meet Challenge of

Meet Challenge of Preserving Diverse Preserving Diverse Resources Resources

  • Help Plan the Nation

Help Plan the Nation’ ’s Most s Most Densely Populated State Densely Populated State

slide-6
SLIDE 6

New Jersey County Characteristics New Jersey County Characteristics

1,134 1,134 7,417 7,417 8,414,350 8,414,350 Total Total 286 286 358 358 102,437 102,437 Warren Warren 5,059 5,059 103 103 522,541 522,541 Union Union 276 276 521 521 144,166 144,166 Sussex Sussex 976 976 305 305 297,490 297,490 Somerset Somerset 190 190 338 338 64,285 64,285 Salem Salem 2,639 2,639 185 185 489,049 489,049 Passaic Passaic 803 803 636 636 510,916 510,916 Ocean Ocean 1,002 1,002 469 469 470,212 470,212 Morris Morris 1,303 1,303 472 472 615,301 615,301 Monmouth Monmouth 2,422 2,422 310 310 750,162 750,162 Middlesex Middlesex 1,552 1,552 226 226 350,761 350,761 Mercer Mercer 283 283 430 430 121,989 121,989 Hunterdon Hunterdon 13,043 13,043 47 47 608,975 608,975 Hudson Hudson 784 784 325 325 254,673 254,673 Gloucester Gloucester 6,285 6,285 126 126 793,633 793,633 Essex Essex 229 229 489 489 146,438 146,438 Cumberland Cumberland 401 401 255 255 102,326 102,326 Cape May Cape May 2,289 2,289 222 222 508,932 508,932 Camden Camden 526 526 805 805 423,394 423,394 Burlington Burlington 3,775 3,775 234 234 884,118 884,118 Bergen Bergen 450 450 561 561 252,552 252,552 Atlantic Atlantic Density Density Land Land Population Population County County

slide-7
SLIDE 7

State Plan Policies State Plan Policies

  • More Important Than Map

More Important Than Map

  • Discussed Policies Will Become Part of State Plan

Discussed Policies Will Become Part of State Plan Where There Is Consensus Where There Is Consensus

  • Policies Need To Be Broadly Applicable

Policies Need To Be Broadly Applicable

  • Cover Wide Range of Topics

Cover Wide Range of Topics

  • Largest Portion Of Staff

Largest Portion Of Staff-

  • to

to-

  • Staff Meetings Spent on

Staff Meetings Spent on Policies Policies

  • State Plan is Advisory

State Plan is Advisory

  • Local Government Still Controls Local Zoning

Local Government Still Controls Local Zoning

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Goals of State Plan Policies Goals of State Plan Policies

  • Slow Sprawling Development

Slow Sprawling Development

  • Traffic

Traffic

  • Congestion

Congestion

  • Pollution

Pollution

  • Strain on Services

Strain on Services

  • Increased Local Property Taxes

Increased Local Property Taxes

  • Protect Natural Resources

Protect Natural Resources

  • Direct Growth & Development to Appropriate Places

Direct Growth & Development to Appropriate Places

  • Revitalize Historic Towns & Cities

Revitalize Historic Towns & Cities

  • Compact Center

Compact Center-

  • Based Development

Based Development

  • Preserve Surrounding Rural Areas

Preserve Surrounding Rural Areas

  • Balanced Land Use Policies

Balanced Land Use Policies

  • Guide State

Guide State’ ’s Investment of Resources s Investment of Resources

  • Stabilize Costs & Taxes

Stabilize Costs & Taxes

  • Protect Quality of Life

Protect Quality of Life

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2007 State Development & 2007 State Development & Redevelopment Plan Redevelopment Plan

  • Currently Being Drafted By OSG

Currently Being Drafted By OSG

  • New Format

New Format

  • Resemble Municipal Master Plan

Resemble Municipal Master Plan

  • More User Friendly

More User Friendly

  • Contain Elements Related to State

Contain Elements Related to State-

  • wide Planning

wide Planning

  • Substantive Input From Relevant State Agencies

Substantive Input From Relevant State Agencies

  • Result of Broad Range of Input

Result of Broad Range of Input

  • Designed to be Relevant for 10 Years

Designed to be Relevant for 10 Years

  • Intended to Be Useful Tool for Implementation of the

Intended to Be Useful Tool for Implementation of the Policies & Goals Stated in the Plan Policies & Goals Stated in the Plan

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Salem County Policy Issues Salem County Policy Issues

  • Economic Development

Economic Development

  • Agriculture Retention Issues

Agriculture Retention Issues

  • Funding

Funding

  • Right

Right-

  • to

to-

  • Farm

Farm

  • Agricultural Viability

Agricultural Viability

  • Center

Center-

  • Based Development/Directing Growth

Based Development/Directing Growth

  • Woodstown

Woodstown

  • Salem City

Salem City

  • Penns Grove

Penns Grove

  • Pennsville

Pennsville

  • Carney

Carney’ ’s Point s Point

  • Transportation

Transportation

  • Resource Protection

Resource Protection

  • Delaware

Delaware Bayshore Bayshore

  • Future Infrastructure

Future Infrastructure

  • Water Supply

Water Supply

  • Sewer Capacity/Sewer Service Areas

Sewer Capacity/Sewer Service Areas

  • School Facility Use/School Costs

School Facility Use/School Costs

  • Concern with Local Property Taxes

Concern with Local Property Taxes

  • Main Street Community (Salem City)

Main Street Community (Salem City)

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

84% 84% 1223 1223 1464 1464 Total Total 288% 288% 98 98 34 34 Woodstown Borough Woodstown Borough 54% 54% 73 73 136 136

Upper Pittsgrove Twp. Upper Pittsgrove Twp.

233% 233% 28 28 12 12 Salem City Salem City 51% 51% 44 44 87 87 Quinton Twp. Quinton Twp. 61% 61% 232 232 379 379 Pittsgrove Twp. Pittsgrove Twp. 103% 103% 205 205 199 199 Pilesgrove Twp. Pilesgrove Twp. 72% 72% 139 139 194 194 Pennsville Twp. Pennsville Twp. 92% 92% 12 12 13 13

Penns Grove Borough Penns Grove Borough

39% 39% 25 25 64 64 Oldmans Twp. Oldmans Twp. 75% 75% 24 24 32 32 Mannington Twp. Mannington Twp. 78% 78% 40 40 51 51

Lower Alloway Lower Alloway’ ’s Creek Twp. s Creek Twp.

15% 15% 3 3 20 20 Elsinboro Twp. Elsinboro Twp. 47% 47% 8 8 17 17 Elmer Borough Elmer Borough 289% 289% 188 188 65 65 Carney Carney’ ’s Point s Point 65% 65% 104 104 161 161 Alloway Twp. Alloway Twp. Comparative % Comparative % 2000 2000-

  • 2005

2005 1990 1990-

  • 1999

1999 Municipality Municipality

Change in Salem County Residential Building Permits Issued 199 Change in Salem County Residential Building Permits Issued 1990 0-

  • 2005

2005

slide-13
SLIDE 13

“Though the largest percentage increase in building permits issued from 2000 to 2005 occurred in areas the County has designated for growth (that is, within the Smart Growth Corridor west of Route 295 or in designated centers east of the Turnpike), the largest number of building permits were issued throughout the areas that are not designated for growth.” – County of Salem Open

Space & Farmland Preservation Plan, December 2006.

Smart Growth Corridor and Centers - 563 Permits (46%) Growth Management Area for Rural, Agricultural Lands - 660 Permits (54%)

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Salem County Mapping Issues Salem County Mapping Issues

  • Most of County is Planning Area 5 (Environmentally

Most of County is Planning Area 5 (Environmentally Sensitive) or Planning Area 4 (Rural/Agricultural) Sensitive) or Planning Area 4 (Rural/Agricultural)

  • “

“Salem County Growth Corridor Salem County Growth Corridor” ” Planning Area 1 Planning Area 1 (Metropolitan) & Planning Area 2 (Suburban) (Metropolitan) & Planning Area 2 (Suburban)

  • Location of Increased Areas of Planning Area 5

Location of Increased Areas of Planning Area 5

  • Areas Proposed for Change Have Significant Environmental

Areas Proposed for Change Have Significant Environmental Constraints Constraints

  • Large Areas Have Already Been Negotiated Back to Planning

Large Areas Have Already Been Negotiated Back to Planning Areas 1 or 2 Areas 1 or 2

  • Net Proposed Change is <5% of Entire County

Net Proposed Change is <5% of Entire County

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Next Steps Next Steps

  • Record & Incorporate Input From Counties &

Record & Incorporate Input From Counties & From Public From Public

  • Continue Process Until All 21 Counties Have

Continue Process Until All 21 Counties Have Participated Participated

  • Finalize Draft of 2007 State Development and

Finalize Draft of 2007 State Development and Redevelopment Plan Redevelopment Plan

  • Request Comment on Draft Plan

Request Comment on Draft Plan

  • Hold Six Public Hearings on Draft Plan

Hold Six Public Hearings on Draft Plan

  • Adopt New State Plan

Adopt New State Plan

slide-18
SLIDE 18