Salem Lakes Pedestrian Path DCM Dave Hansen July 3,2012 1 SALEM - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

salem lakes pedestrian path
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Salem Lakes Pedestrian Path DCM Dave Hansen July 3,2012 1 SALEM - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

City Council Presentation Salem Lakes Pedestrian Path DCM Dave Hansen July 3,2012 1 SALEM LAKES PROPERTY LINES PREE LN 3900 - 3935 PREE LN 3900 - 3935 PREE LN 3900 - 3935 A PREE LN 3900 - 3935 N N N N REE LN 3900 - 3935 N


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

City Council Presentation Salem Lakes Pedestrian Path

DCM Dave Hansen July 3,2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

SALEM LAKES PROPERTY LINES

NTANA CT 1900 - 1999 TANA CT 1900 - 1999 TANA CT 1900 - 1999 TANA CT 1900 - 1999 TANA CT 1900 - 1999 CENTENNIAL CIR 1922 - 1931 CENTENNIAL CIR 1922 - 1931 CENTENNIAL CIR 1922 - 1931 CENTENNIAL CIR 1922 - 1931 CENTENNIAL CIR 1922 - 1931 COUGAR CT 1808 - 1899 COUGAR CT 1808 - 1899 COUGAR CT 1808 - 1899 COUGAR CT 1808 - 1899 COUGAR CT 1808 - 1899 EWING PL 1800 - 1823 EWING PL 1800 - 1823 EWING PL 1800 - 1823 EWING PL 1800 - 1823 EWING PL 1800 - 1823 EWING PL 1824 - 1899 EWING PL 1824 - 1899 EWING PL 1824 - 1899 EWING PL 1824 - 1899 EWING PL 1824 - 1899 D A R R O W S T 1 D A R R O W S T 1 D A R R O W S T 1 D A R R O W S T D A R R O W S T 1 H U E Y C T 3 8

  • 3

8 9 9 H U E Y C T 3 8

  • 3

8 9 9 H U E Y C T 3 8

  • 3

8 9 9 H U E Y C T 3 8

  • 3

8 9 9 H U E Y C T 3 8

  • 3

8 9 9 C E N T E N N I A L C I R 1 8 8 C E N T E N N I A L C I R 1 8 8 6 C E N T E N N I A L C I R 1 8 8 6 C E N T E N N I A L C I R 1 8 8 6 C E N T E N N I A L C I R 1 8 8 6 RNING VIEW DR 3900 - 3926 RNING VIEW DR 3900 - 3926 RNING VIEW DR 3900 - 3926 RNING VIEW DR 3900 - 3926 RNING VIEW DR 3900 - 3926 JOUSTING ARCH 3800 - 3803 JOUSTING ARCH 3800 - 3803 JOUSTING ARCH 3800 - 3803 JOUSTING ARCH 3800 - 3803 JOUSTING ARCH 3800 - 3803 BIG BEAR CT 3800 - 3899 BIG BEAR CT 3800 - 3899 BIG BEAR CT 3800 - 3899 BIG BEAR CT 3800 - 3899 BIG BEAR CT 3800 - 3899 C A R I B O U C T 3 8

  • 3

8 9 9 C A R I B O U C T 3 8

  • 3

8 9 9 C A R I B O U C T 3 8

  • 3

8 9 9 C A R I B O U C T 3 8

  • 3

8 9 9 C A R I B O U C T 3 8

  • 3

8 9 9 CENTENNIAL CIR 2119 - 2199 CENTENNIAL CIR 2119 - 2199 CENTENNIAL CIR 2119 - 2199 CENTENNIAL CIR 2119 - 2199 CENTENNIAL CIR 2119 - 2199 CENTENNIAL CIR 1853 - 1866 CENTENNIAL CIR 1853 - 1866 CENTENNIAL CIR 1853 - 1866 CENTENNIAL CIR 1853 - 1866 CENTENNIAL CIR 1853 - 1866 INCA CT 2000 - 2099 INCA CT 2000 - 2099 INCA CT 2000 - 2099 INCA CT 2000 - 2099 INCA CT 2000 - 2099 GREY DOVE LN 3771 - 3799 GREY DOVE LN 3771 - 3799 GREY DOVE LN 3771 - 3799 GREY DOVE LN 3771 - 3799 GREY DOVE LN 3771 - 3799 EWING CT 3800 - 3899 EWING CT 3800 - 3899 EWING CT 3800 - 3899 EWING CT 3800 - 3899 EWING CT 3800 - 3899 ADOBE CT 2000 - 2099 ADOBE CT 2000 - 2099 ADOBE CT 2000 - 2099 ADOBE CT 2000 - 2099 ADOBE CT 2000 - 2099 BUCKHORN PL 3857 - 3899 BUCKHORN PL 3857 - 3899 BUCKHORN PL 3857 - 3899 BUCKHORN PL 3857 - 3899 BUCKHORN PL 3857 - 3899 J O U S T I N G A R C H 3 8 4

  • 3

8 7 8 J O U S T I N G A R C H 3 8 4

  • 3

8 7 8 J O U S T I N G A R C H 3 8 4

  • 3

8 7 8 J O U S T I N G A R C H 3 8 4

  • 3

8 7 8 J O U S T I N G A R C H 3 8 4

  • 3

8 7 8 LANTANA PL 3900 - 3931 LANTANA PL 3900 - 3931 LANTANA PL 3900 - 3931 LANTANA PL 3900 - 3931 LANTANA PL 3900 - 3931 N C T 3 9

  • 3

9 9 9 N C T 3 9

  • 3

9 9 9 A N C T 3 9

  • 3

9 9 9 N C T 3 9

  • 3

9 9 9 N C T 3 9

  • 3

9 9 9 C O Y O T E C I R 3 8

  • 3

8 9 9 C O Y O T E C I R 3 8

  • 3

8 9 9 C O Y O T E C I R 3 8

  • 3

8 9 9 C O Y O T E C I R 3 8

  • 3

8 9 9 C O Y O T E C I R 3 8

  • 3

8 9 9 CENTENNIAL CIR 2052 CENTENNIAL CIR 2052 CENTENNIAL CIR 2052 CENTENNIAL CIR 2052 CENTENNIAL CIR 2052 GENESEE WAY 1900 GENESEE WAY 1900 - GENESEE WAY 1900 GENESEE WAY 1900 GENESEE WAY 1900 C E N T E N N I A L C I R 1 9 6

  • 1

9 8 7 C E N T E N N I A L C I R 1 9 6

  • 1

9 8 7 C E N T E N N I A L C I R 1 9 6

  • 1

9 8 7 C E N T E N N I A L C I R 1 9 6

  • 1

9 8 7 C E N T E N N I A L C I R 1 9 6

  • 1

9 8 7 CENTENNIAL CIR 1908 - 1921 CENTENNIAL CIR 1908 - 1921 CENTENNIAL CIR 1908 - 1921 CENTENNIAL CIR 1908 - 1921 CENTENNIAL CIR 1908 - 1921 PREE LN 3900 - 3935 PREE LN 3900 - 3935 PREE LN 3900 - 3935 REE LN 3900 - 3935 PREE LN 3900 - 3935 BUCKHORN PL 3800 - 3856 BUCKHORN PL 3800 - 3856 BUCKHORN PL 3800 - 3856 BUCKHORN PL 3800 - 3856 BUCKHORN PL 3800 - 3856 M L A K E S B L V D 3 9

  • 3

9 1 M L A K E S B L V D 3 9

  • 3

9 1 M L A K E S B L V D 3 9

  • 3

9 1 M L A K E S B L V D 3 9

  • 3

9 1 M L A K E S B L V D 3 9

  • 3

9 1

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

LAKE/EASEMENT BACKGROUND

  • Aug. 6, 1979 – City Council granted change of zoning to developer, with the

following conditions:

  • “A public recreation/open space easement should be established at the time of subdivision to cover

the jogging path. The city will assume maintenance responsibility for those areas. HOWEVER, THE CITY WILL NOT ACCEPT MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PROPOSED LAKE.”

  • “The 7:1 slope of bank should be established around the lake from the edge of the water to the level

area on which the jogging path is proposed. The level area should be at least 15 feet wide with the 6-foot wide jogging path located in the center.”

  • Sept. – Oct. 1982 – Developer and City executed Subdivision Agreements, all

containing:

  • “A 15’ wide public pedestrian recreation/open space easement is to be dedicated to the City. A 6’

wide jogging path is to be centered within the 15’ easement.”

1983 – 1984 – 8 plats recorded at various times, each showing the easement area and dedicating the easement to the City by plat note.

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

RECENT HISTORY

  • 2005-10 – Severity of bank collapsing increased

– Severity of weather events – Soil conditions – Lack of 7:1 slope

  • 2009 – Parks & Recreation concerned with being able to

maintain easement area for grounds maintenance

  • 2010 - City staff conducts initial assessment

– Briefed City management & district Council member – Posted “Use trail with caution” signs

  • 2011 - Developing recommended plan of action

– Commenced alternatives analysis and cost estimating – Briefed City management & district Council member

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CURRENT SITUATION - 2012

  • March – Notified district Council members of urgency to

address public safety issues at the path

  • April - Initiated survey of pedestrian easement
  • Closed path due to increased public safety risk
  • Performed alternatives analysis
  • May - Police initiate Neighborhood Watch with 40+

residents at meeting

  • June 11 - Conducted public information/safety meeting
  • July 3 - Brief City Council

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Neighborhood Sidewalk Connectivity

This map shows that there is good pedestrian connectivity in place in Salem Lakes considering sidewalks exist on both sides of Centennial Circle, the main road that surrounds the lakefront lots. The sidewalk network includes other roads connecting in toward the lake off of Centennial Circle. Sidewalk Maintenance - Residents commented that help is needed from the City to cut back lawns that have grown over the sidewalk.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Bank Failure

2012 2010 2010 2012

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Bank Failure

2010 2012

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Bank Failure

2012 2010

slide-10
SLIDE 10

THE PUBLIC EASEMENT

All of the lots surrounding the lake are platted to the center of the lake. The City has a 15 foot public easement allowing the public the right to walk along a 6 foot path supposed to be located in the center of the easement. The City has responsibility for the maintenance of the public easement area and the

  • path. The developer was to have created a 7:1 slope from the waters edge to the edge of

the public easement. Concerns that the eroding bank has encroached into the public easement because the 6 foot path was portended to be in the middle of the easement. A survey of the public easement and the top of the bank was conducted to determine the location of the path and the degree of encroachment of the bank failure.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF EASEMENT VACATION

  • The public will no longer have the right to travel on the

path.

  • The City will no longer be responsible for maintenance
  • f the easement area or the asphalt path.
  • The City will maintain its right to drainage easements

within the lake; may need to establish maintenance easements to access.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO VACATE EASEMENT

  • Easement was dedicated by plat; will be vacated pursuant to Va. Code

§ 15.2-2271, by ordinance of the governing body.

  • Notice must be given pursuant to Va. Code § 15.2-2204; advertised
  • nce a week for two consecutive weeks; public hearing to be held

before Council adoption.

  • Draft proposed Ordinance to be presented to City Council

– Ordinance to authorize City Manager to execute necessary documents to vacate easement

  • Identify/verify 52 homeowners (to be named in Deeds of Vacation)

– Deeds will be recorded to evidence easement has been vacated in chain

  • f title

– Eight (8) separate Deeds to coincide with eight (8) subdivision plats recorded during neighborhood development

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Salem Lakes Neighborhood Path Public Information Meeting

  • 77 citizens signed in

 35 were citizens who lived on lakefront property  42 were citizens who lived elsewhere in the Salem Lake neighborhood (not lakefront)

  • City staff: 2x DCMs, P & R, PW, PD, City Attorney, HNP, Finance/Risk Mgt

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Neighborhood Issues From June 11, 2012 Information Meeting

  • Nutria – too many, eroding banks, aggressive, need to eliminate (Animal Control)
  • Residents feeding the wildlife – need them to stop (Animal Control)
  • Culverts – PW identified three in most need of bank stabilization, need to identify and

assess all other culverts (PW)

  • Access – need to close the access for safety, possibly use chain link fence (P&R)
  • Unkempt yards – need City assistance to have owners maintain (Code Enforcement)
  • Permits for bank stabilization – owners reported they have been told they cannot get

permits, need to work with owners who want to do bank stabilization (Planning)

  • Illegal dumping – several areas were identified where illegal dumping is occurring (Code

Enforcement and Waste Management)

  • Neighborhood Watch Program (Police)
  • Civic League or HOA – HOA is not likely, but there is some interest in starting a civic league

(City Atty)

  • Illegal activities along path behind houses, disorderly behavior, trash, and graffiti (PD)
  • Causeway – near unanimous support by attendees to remove (PW; PU will also be

involved because of 10” gravity sanitary sewer line)

  • Pedestrian path removal (PW)

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Housing Code Enforcement Actions

Unkempt yards

  • Staff walked the entire pathway and conducted thorough inspections
  • Several notices of violation were issued for unkempt properties
  • Overgrowth on the banks of the lake are exempt; bushes are exempt from code
  • No hazardous trees were found

Illegal Dumping

  • Illegal dumping sites are monitored weekly and issues investigated; notices of

violation are issued when a responsible party can be located

  • Staff works directly with waste management to have items removed when a

responsible party cannot be located Graffiti

  • The Sheriff’s Workforce abated one instance of graffiti along the pathway
  • Staff is working to develop an abatement plan for another site which is not

readily accessible

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Animal Issues

  • Responding to the concerns expressed, Animal Control began conducting a

Planned Patrol to get a sense of scope and severity of problem

  • 11 visits produced 0 observations of any violations
  • Animal Control met with Wildlife biologist for Virginia DGIF and a USDA

Wildlife Specialist

– There is a colony of approximately 20 nutria – These nutria are not responsible for the erosion and pose no threat to public safety – There is a limited natural food source that should keep the population in check – Eradication via trapping will cost approximately $10,000 (via USDA) & there is no guarantee trapping will eradicate a sufficient number to overcome breeding rate or new migration – Trapping is not recommended

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Feeding Wildlife

  • In 11 visits to the park Animal Enforcement saw 0 cases of
  • feeding. Animal Enforcement will be looking at other locations

along the pedestrian path during future visits.

  • Waterfowl congregation and the feeding of waterfowl contributes
  • nly a small portion to the erosion problems.
  • The presence of waterfowl is considered a benefit by many and

efforts to eradicate them are often controversial.

  • City ordinance Sec. 5-547 prohibits feeding wildlife on public

property (parks) and staff is prepared to present an ordinance to this Council if necessary which would prohibit feeding waterfowl

  • n private property in Salem Lakes.

– There are several prerequisites to this ordinance including a requirement the feeding activity is creating a nuisance, signs are posted, and DGIF is notified- a letter from the Manager has been prepared.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Probable Permitting Requirements For Individual Homeowners To Repair Bank Slopes

  • Each lot or group of lots must be evaluated to determine the specific permitting

requirements and applicable review processes

  • IF BANK SLOPE AND/OR TOE CONTAIN JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS – Army Corp Of Engineers

Approval Required; Follow ACOE Permit Processes.

  • IF AREA OF DISTURBANCE IS GREATER THAN 2,500 SQUARE FEET – Land Disturbing Permit

Required; Planning/DSC Must Approve Erosion And Sediment Control Plan Prepared By Licensed Professional; Surety and Permit Required

  • IF FILLING IS NECESSARY WITH THE “FLOODPLAIN SUBJECT TO SPECIAL RESTRICTIONS” - A

Floodplain Variance May Be Necessary; Depending On The Extent Of Fill This May Require City Council Approval; Planning/DSC Must Approve Plans And Calculations Prepared By A Licensed Professional

  • IF ANY STRUCTURES (i.e., BULKHEADS, WALLS, DOCKS) ARE PROPOSED A BUILDING PERMIT IS

REQUIRED - Structural Plans Must Be Prepared By a P.E.

  • IF ANY WORK IS PROPOSED IN A PUBLIC EASEMENT – Right Of Way Permit Required;

Planning/DSC Must Approve Site Plan Prepared By Licensed Professional; Surety And Permit Required

  • Recommend that Bank Stabilization be performed on large areas encompassing

multiple lots by qualified licensed contractors to achieve expected results

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Damage Since Path Closure

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Costs of Vacating Public Path

  • Costs for permanently

securing access points –

  • Approx. $10,000
  • Cost to remove the

asphalt path approx. $130,000

– Duration - Three months including obtaining permits – Obtain right of entry from homeowners as required to perform the work

20

2012

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Investigation of Various Shoreline Stabilization Alternatives for Parks

  • Conditions Assessment
  • Wetland Delineation
  • Slope Stability, Topographic,

and Alternative Analysis

  • Prioritized Recommendations

includes Environmental Permitting cost estimates:

– Alt 1 – Rip Rap = $95,259 – Alt 2 – 3:1 slope/wetland bench = $68,885 – Alt 3 – 3:1 Vegetated Geoweb = $82,274

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Investigation of Outfalls

  • Three critical areas
  • outfalls 4 & 7
  • culvert pipe 6
  • One high priority at outfall 2
  • All other outfalls were

classified as low priority

1 2 3 4 11 6 5 9 10 8 7 Outfall 3 is submerged

22

Outfall 11 Outfall 10 Outfall 9 Outfall 4 Outfall 2 Outfall 7 Outfall 5 Outfall 6 Outfall 8 Outfall 1

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Critical Areas Affecting Public Infrastructure

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Outfall #4

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Outfall #7

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Outfall #2

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Bank Failure Adjacent to Pedestrian Easement

  • No bank erosion has encroached into the public easement.
  • Outfall #4: Top of Bank (TOB) is near edge of easement above storm outfall.

Approx 90 linear feet (LF) with TOB within 10 feet of pedestrian easement.

  • Outfall #7: Approximately 130 LF with TOB within 6-10 feet of pedestrian

easement.

  • Outfall #2: Approximately 60 LF with TOB within 7-10 feet of pedestrian
  • easement. Additional 45 LF will be stabilized at outfall.
  • Pedestrian crossing/culvert: Approximately 145LF with TOB in easement,

however, citizens overwhelmingly want it removed.

  • Other areas where TOB is within 10 LF of the pedestrian easement:

– Behind 3861, & 3869 Buckhorn Place (Lot 38 & 40) - approx. 95 LF @ 6-10 ft. – Behind 3805 Buckhorn Place (Lot 24)– approx. 20 LF @ 8-10 ft. – Behind 3820 Jousting Arch (Lot 13)– approx. 60 LF @ 7-10 ft. – Behind 3829 & 3825 Buckhorn Place (Lot 30 & 29) - approx. 70 LF @ 6-10 ft

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Shoreline Stabilization Cost Estimates

  • Stabilize outfalls 4 & 7: $150,000
  • Stabilize outfalls 4 & 7 and culvert bank of lake

crossover walkway: $250,000

  • Stabilize outfalls 4 & 7 and remove culvert and lake

crossover walkway: $300,000

  • Stabilize outfall 2 : $50,000
  • Stabilize all other outfalls: $150,000
  • Reconstruct other shoreline areas with bank eroded to

within 10 feet of the public easement area: $150,000

  • Reconstruct entire lake shoreline except for Park area:

$2,500,000

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Considerations

  • City has over 400 wet BMPs (Lakes and Ponds).
  • Salem Lakes is the only private BMP that has such a public

easement and a pedestrian path around the lake.

  • Stormwater enterprise does not perform bank stabilization on wet

BMPs except to protect stormwater infrastructure.

  • Planning figure for bank stabilization is @$600 per linear foot
  • Bank erosion on Salem Lake has not encroached into the public

easement (closest is outfall #4).

  • Stormwater outfalls on Salem Lake require stabilization effort.
  • To perform bank stabilization away from Stormwater

infrastructure requires considerable private owner and permit approvals.

  • Removal of the crossover walkway will not interfere with existing

10 inch sanitary sewer (gravity) crossing (15 feet deep).

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Manhole ~15 feet deep Sanitary Sewer Crossing ~15 feet deep

Salem Lakes Walkway 10 – inch Sanitary Sewer Line Crossing (gravity)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Staff Recommendation

  • Initiate procedures to vacate the public easement.
  • Remove the asphalt pedestrian path, grade and seed

damaged areas and permanently secure access

  • points. ($140,000)
  • Design, permit and construct stabilization for the

western City Park. ($95,250)

  • Negotiate lake access for eastern park
  • Design, permit and construct stabilization for the City

stormwater outfalls only. ($350,000)

  • Remove the crossover walkway and culvert and

restore the shoreline. ($150,000)

31

$735,250 + contingency

slide-32
SLIDE 32

NEXT STEPS

  • Run first advertisement on Sunday, July 29
  • Run second advertisement on Sunday, Aug. 5
  • Public Hearing to be held on Tuesday, Aug. 14
  • Present Ordinance to Vacate Easement on Tuesday,
  • Aug. 14, following Public Hearing.
  • If adopted, prepare Deeds of Vacation, execute and
  • record. Effective upon completing the work.
  • Complete design, submit permit applications and order

materials for path removal and bank stabilization at City parks and at our stormwater outfalls.

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

City Council Discussion & Direction

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Public Meeting Agenda

34

  • Welcome and Staff Introductions
  • Path History Details and Public Safety/Risk
  • Bank Failure and Stormwater Outfall, Causeway/Bridge
  • Neighborhood Sidewalk Connectivity, Salem Lakes Park

Shoreline Stabilization Project, and Closing of Path/Recent Damage

  • Complete Design of Park Shoreline Work
  • Complete Design of Public Works Infrastructure Work
  • Identify Funding for Projects
  • Neighborhood Watch Program
  • Removal of Path and Vacate Easement
  • Next steps