A Stochastic Model for Tropical Rainfall.
Scott Hottovy and Sam Stechmann (UW) shottovy@math.wisc.edu
United States Naval Academy
ONR DURIP grant N00014-14-1-0251
- S. Hottovy, USNA
- Trop. Rain
Oct 1, 2016
A Stochastic Model for Tropical Rainfall. Scott Hottovy and Sam - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
A Stochastic Model for Tropical Rainfall. Scott Hottovy and Sam Stechmann (UW) shottovy@math.wisc.edu United States Naval Academy ONR DURIP grant N00014-14-1-0251 S. Hottovy, USNA Trop. Rain Oct 1, 2016 Cloud organization: tropics and
United States Naval Academy
Oct 1, 2016
◮ Midlattitudes: Dynamics are quasi-solvable, dominated by
◮ Tropics: More random, multi-scale problem.
Oct 1, 2016
◮ Midlattitudes: Dynamics are quasi-solvable, dominated by
◮ Tropics: More random, multi-scale problem.
Oct 1, 2016
Oct 1, 2016
Oct 1, 2016
(from Zhang 2005) (from Wheeler & Kiladis 1999)
Oct 1, 2016
(from Wheeler & Kiladis 1999)
Oct 1, 2016
◮ Nonlinear dynamics ◮ Two-way interactions with background state ◮ Khouider & Majda (2006, ...),
◮ Stechmann & Neelin (2011),
◮ Majda & Khouider (2002),
Oct 1, 2016
◮ Develop a model of column water vapor (CWV)
◮ Model the background spectrum of the atmosphere ◮ Model should be simple for fast/cheap simulation ◮ Should have signs of criticality, power laws, spikes in
◮ from obs. Peters/Neelin 2006, Neelin/Peters/Hales 2009
◮ Hypothesis:
◮ The tropical background state is modeled by turbulent
Oct 1, 2016
τ q + D ˙
Oct 1, 2016
τ q + D ˙
Oct 1, 2016
◮ Size of grid ∆x = ∆y = 5 km for scale of convection ◮ Coarsened to 25 km × 25 km for typical radar footprint
Oct 1, 2016
◮ a site is precipitating when, qi,j(t) > q∗ = 65 mm. ◮ cloud indicator, and precip. rate
◮ q comes from a linear equation, σ, r are non-linear!
Oct 1, 2016
◮ Fourier transform in space qi,j −
◮ Makes for very fast/cheap large simulations (106 grid
Oct 1, 2016
Wavenumber k (2π/40000 km) Frequency (cpd) PSD of CWV −10 10 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 6 6.5 7
(from Wheeler & Kiladis 1999)
∗
k
∗
Oct 1, 2016
PDF 10-3
0.5 1 1.5 2
Mean Precip. [mm/hr] 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Conditional mean precip. CWV PDF
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 90 Precipitation variance × L0.42 103 102 101 100 10–1 10–2 10–3 104 10–4 Variance × L2 40 50 60 w (mm) 30 70 L = 2 L = 1 L = 0.5 L = 0.25 55 60 65 70 50 75 w (mm)
(figures on right from Peters & Neelin 2006) ◮ peaks concentrated near critical point ◮ shows evidence of (self-organized) criticality
Oct 1, 2016
10
1
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
−6
10
−5
10
−4
10
−3
10
−2
10
−1
10 Cloud Size Distribution by Area Cloud Area [km2] PDF Cloud pdf Best fit−1.528 (from Wood & Field 2011)
Oct 1, 2016
◮ Why does a simple linear model have evidence of
◮ with 2-D Ising Model ◮ Parameters:
∗ ↔ kBT
◮ Edwards-Wilkinson model
◮ Model for 1D random
Oct 1, 2016
◮ From connections with GFF, interesting limit of τ → ∞. ◮ Hold mean (Fτ) constant.
10
1
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
6
10
−6
10
−5
10
−4
10
−3
10
−2
10
−1
10 Cloud Size Distribution by Area Cloud Area [km2] PDF τ=1 τ=10 τ=96 τ=103 τ=104 Best fit=−1.19
Oct 1, 2016
◮ Background spectrum is modeled by turbulent
◮ Water vapor q(x, y, t) ◮ Linear stochastic model – but nonlinear statistics (of
◮ Leads to analytic statistics or cheap numerical sampling ◮ Behavior similar to self-organized criticality
Oct 1, 2016
◮ Background spectrum is modeled by turbulent
◮ Water vapor q(x, y, t) ◮ Linear stochastic model – but nonlinear statistics (of
◮ Leads to analytic statistics or cheap numerical sampling ◮ Behavior similar to self-organized criticality
(This work was supported by ONR DURIP grant N00014-14-1-0251)
Oct 1, 2016