A Step Towards census From satellite
Koel Roychowdhury Simon Jones Colin Arrowsmith Karin Reinke
School of Mathematical and Geospatial Sciences RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
A Step Towards census From satellite Koel Roychowdhury Simon - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
A Step Towards census From satellite Koel Roychowdhury Simon Jones Colin Arrowsmith Karin Reinke School of Mathematical and Geospatial Sciences RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia Overview Introduction Research Objectives
Koel Roychowdhury Simon Jones Colin Arrowsmith Karin Reinke
School of Mathematical and Geospatial Sciences RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
RMIT University Slide 2
RMIT University Slide 3
RMIT University Slide 4
RMIT University Slide 5
Achieve this by:
and information derived from DMSP-OLS images
metrics
RMIT University Slide 6
RMIT University Slide 7
RMIT University Slide 8
RMIT University Slide 9
Census Vector Datasets Sampling of (24) Districts Statistical Testing Census Metrics (10 / 144) Selected Models Validation Final Outputs DMSP - OLS Images Mean and
Brightness Annual Composite 2001 Average DN Annual Composite 2001 Intercalibration
Census data processing DMSP image processing Model development and implementation
RMIT University Slide 10
RMIT University Slide 11
RMIT University Slide 12
RMIT University Slide 13
RMIT University Slide 14
Summary Statistic District Highest mean Average DN Raigarh Lowest mean Average DN Gadchiroli Highest SD Average DN Nagpur Lowest SD Average DN Gadchiroli Highest mean brightness Nagpur and Pune (>20 watts/cm2/um) Lowest mean brightness Bhandara (<10 watts/cm2/um) Highest SD brightness Nagpur Lowest SD brightness Bhandara
RMIT University Slide 15
RMIT University Slide 16
RMIT University Slide 17
Statistical Tests Bootstrapping and correlation coefficients Tests for normal Distribution Histogram and Normal – Probability (N-P) Plots Skewness and Kurtosis
RMIT University Slide 18
RMIT University Slide 19
RMIT University Slide 20
help overcome problems
created
(at 95% confidence)
different census variables and average brightness
Bootstrap distribution of correlation coefficients between electricity and average brightness Bootstrap distribution of correlation coefficients between population density and average brightness
RMIT University Slide 21
RMIT University Slide 22
RMIT University Slide 23
RMIT University Slide 24
RMIT University Slide 25
Urban population density per square Kilometre
Observed values Predicted Values a) Mean Brightness b) Standard Deviation Brightness c) Mean Average DN d) Standard Deviation Average DN r2 = 0.93, p<0.05 r2 = 0.79, p<0.05 r2 = 0.68, p<0.05 r2 = 0.42, p<0.05
RMIT University Slide 26
25%
RMIT University Slide 27
RMIT University Slide 28
Observed values Predicted Values a) Mean and SD average DN b) Mean and SD Brightness c) Mean and SD average DN, and brightness r2 = 0.71, p<0.05 r2 = 0.92, p<0.05 r2 = 0.92, p<0.05
RMIT University Slide 29
Observed values Predicted Values a) Mean and SD average DN b) Mean and SD Brightness c) Mean and SD average DN and brightness
r2 = 0.68, p<0.05 r2 = 0.92, p<0.05 r2 = 0.90, p<0.05
RMIT University Slide 30
RMIT University Slide 31
) ( 5740684 . 15 12820 . 119 /
2
brightness mean Km ion banPopulat ExpectedUr × + − =
) ( 505353 . 4 ) ( 039980 . 22 ) ( 9849033 . 20 /
2
AverageDN SD DN average Mean brightness mean Km Population Urban Expected × + × − × = -108.45+16.93x(mean brightness)-2.48x(mean Average DN)
RMIT University Slide 32
RMIT University Slide 33
RMIT University Slide 34
(a) (b)
RMIT University Slide 36
census metrics at sub-national level.
sex ratio and education facilities per square Kilometre) do not have significant correlations with either brightness or average DN.
produced maximum errors in predicted values.
correlation coefficients but was always predicted with least error.
RMIT University Slide 37
administrative regions lower than districts.
village (rural) level.
dataset and compare the results.
RMIT University Slide 38