A Roadmap for the Future of A Roadmap for the Future of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a roadmap for the future of a roadmap for the future of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Roadmap for the Future of A Roadmap for the Future of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Roadmap for the Future of A Roadmap for the Future of Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science Multi- -Site Videoconferencing Site Videoconferencing Multi Manchester Computing A Report for the UK e-Science Programme Michael Daw 21


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Manchester Computing

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science Michael Daw 21st May 2003 TERENA Networking Conference Zagreb, Croatia

A Roadmap for the Future of A Roadmap for the Future of Multi Multi-

  • Site Videoconferencing

Site Videoconferencing

A Report for the UK e-Science Programme

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Manchester Computing

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science

Co Co-

  • Contributors

Contributors

Stephen Booth (University of Edinburgh) John Brooke (University of Manchester) Kate Caldwell (University of Cambridge) Liz Carver (BAE Systems) David De Roure (University of Southampton) Alan Flavell (University of Glasgow) Philippe Galvez (California Institute of Technology [Caltech]) Brian Gilmore (University of Edinburgh) Henry Hughes (UKERNA) Ben Juby (University of Southampton) Ivan Judson (Argonne National Laboratory) Jim Miller (inSORS Integrated Communications, Inc.) Harvey Newman (California Institute of Technology [Caltech]) Chris Osland (Rutherford Appleton Laboratory) Sue Rogers (University of Cambridge)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 3

Contents

  • Context for Report - the UK e-Science Core Programme &

Videoconferencing

  • Report Contents
  • Access Grid
  • H.323/H.320
  • Virtual Rooms Videoconferencing System (VRVS)
  • Non-Studio-Based Videoconferencing
  • Interoperability
  • Report Recommendations
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 4

e-Science Core Programme

UK effort to be at the forefront of Grid research Grid will provide ‘easy access to computing power, data processing and communication of results’ National Centre and 8 Regional Centres spread across 12 sites Many UK projects with inter- and intranational collaborations Clear need for collaboration technology Centres have Access Grid nodes

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 5

Report Contents

Where each technology fits best Costs Ease of use Display, visual, audio quality Networking issues* Multi-site issues Collaborative tools Security* Future Potential* Interoperability* Recommendations for UK e-Science Programme*

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 6

Access Grid

Research tool – started by Argonne National Lab

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 7

Access Grid

Commodity equipment, Open Source software Large-scale display High-quality full-duplex audio Multicast “Advanced Collaboration Environment” - AG2:

– Integration with Grid technologies (security/data management) – Framework for integrated services – Improved network features – Better audio-visual quality

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 8

H.323/H.320

“Mainstream” videoconferencing (e.g. Tandberg, Polycom)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 9

H.323/H.320

H.323 = IP; H.320 = ISDN Usually employ hardware codecs, into which are plugged microphones/cameras Broadcast quality video Single video stream – makes multi-site conferences hard Older systems use ‘voice-selected’ video H.323 insecure; H.320 highly secure

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 10

VRVS

Research project – started by Caltech

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 11

VRVS

Central web server; worldwide reflector network Major strength is usability with wide variety of soft/hardware clients (H.323 or Mbone) Used by wide range of facilities (laptops to studios) Like AG, used for large multi-site conferences Future developments:

– User authentication; more virtual rooms; selection of bandwidth ranges; centralised control; improved video; improved network features

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 12

Non-Studio-Based Videoconferencing

Low cost DIY solution

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 13

Non-Studio-Based Videoconferencing

Typically uses commodity (H.323) software, desktop computer, video cam, microphone headset, non-dedicated space Quality of experience limited, although can be improved using cheap echo cancellation/hardware codecs, etc. Security is limited or non-existent Best suited to one-to-one meetings where seeing co- participants is useful or to conduct limited data sharing Also useful to supplement studio-based facilities when they are not available (e.g. due to large timezone differences)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 14

Interoperability

What if collaborators have different technologies? Joint Industrial-Academic projects People “on the road” Mix and match to provide greater security (e.g. using telephone with Access Grid) Fallback solutions

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 15

Interoperability – Technical Issues

Host/dominant technology

Yes Yes With H.323 / H.320 bridge With H.323 / H.320 bridge Problematic

H.320 Phone H.323 VRVS Access Grid

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes With most codecs With H.323 / H.320 bridge Yes Yes Problematic Yes With H.323 / H.320 bridge Yes Yes With certain configuration Yes Problematic Problematic With VRVS server Yes

Phone H.320 H.323 VRVS Access Grid

Guest technology

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 16

Interoperability – Other Issues

“Lowest common denominator” user experience Technically challenging – can lead to operational difficulties Booking systems

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 17

Report Recommendations (1)

  • 1. Create an e-Science advanced collaborative

environments R&D effort

  • 2. Formalise Access Grid support
  • 3. Deployment advice through existing agencies
  • 4. Enable full interoperability between Access Grid and

VRVS

  • 5. Enable maximum interoperability between Access Grid

and H.323/H.320

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science 18

Report Recommendations (2)

  • 6. Deploy and support multicast bridge(s) as a stopgap

measure for non-multicast-enabled sites

  • 7. Reduce Access Grid resource implications by working

closely with commercial vendor(s)

  • 8. Improve local networking in support of IP-based

videoconferencing

  • 9. Investigate improvements for multi-site booking systems
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Manchester Computing

Supercomputing, Visualization & e-Science

Contact Details

http://www.sve.man.ac.uk/General/Staff/daw michael.daw@man.ac.uk

SVE @ Manchester Computing SVE @ Manchester Computing