a model for commuting pairs of contractions on hilbert
play

A model for commuting pairs of contractions on Hilbert space - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A model for commuting pairs of contractions on Hilbert space Nicholas Young Leeds and Newcastle Universities Newcastle, March 2017 Synopsis Contractions and shifts The Nagy-Foias functional model of a contraction The symmetrized


  1. A model for commuting pairs of contractions on Hilbert space Nicholas Young Leeds and Newcastle Universities Newcastle, March 2017

  2. Synopsis • Contractions and shifts • The Nagy-Foias functional model of a contraction • The symmetrized bidisc Γ – an interesting set in C 2 • Γ-analogues of contractions, unitaries and isometries • A Nagy-Foias functional model for Γ-contractions

  3. The idea of a model of an operator There is no ‘canonical form’ of bounded linear operators on Hilbert space under unitary equivalence. The next best thing would be to express the general oper- ator as a part of a well-understood operator having a rich structure. This is the purpose of the book Harmonic analysis of operators on Hilbert space , by C. Foias and B. Sz.-Nagy, 1966. It expresses a general operator, up to unitary equivalence, in terms of ‘shift operators’ on Hilbert spaces of functions having analytic structure.

  4. Contractions A contraction is a linear operator P on a Hilbert space H such that � P � ≤ 1. If P is a bounded linear operator on H then P is a contraction if id H − P ∗ P ≥ 0. The defect operator D P of a contraction P on H is the 1 positive operator (1 − P ∗ P ) 2 , acting on H . 1 The defect operator of P ∗ is thus D P ∗ = (1 − PP ∗ ) 2 . The defect space D P of P is ran D P , a subspace of H . We have P D P ⊂ D P ∗ .

  5. Some basic objects Let E be a separable Hilbert space. L 2 ( E ) is the Lebesgue space of square-integrable E -valued functions f on T with norm � � f � 2 = T | f ( z ) | 2 m ( dz ) where m is normalized Lebesgue measure on T . H 2 ( E ) is the Hardy space of analytic E -valued functions on D . H 2 ( E ) can be thought of as the closed subspace of L 2 ( E ) comprising the functions f whose negative Fourier coeffi- cients ˆ f ( n ) , n < 0, vanish.

  6. The shift operator The shift operator on H 2 ( E ) is the operator T z defined for f ∈ H 2 ( E ) by ( T z f )( z ) = zf ( z ) for z ∈ T . Note that T z shifts the Taylor coefficients of a function in H 2 ( E ): T z ( a 0 + a 1 z + a 2 z 2 + . . . ) = 0 + a 0 z + a 1 z 2 + . . . . The adjoint operator T ∗ z on H 2 ( E ) shifts coefficients back- wards : z ( a 0 + a 1 z + a 2 z 2 + . . . ) = a 1 + a 2 z + a 3 z 2 + . . . . T ∗ T z and T ∗ z are well understood operators.

  7. The Nagy-Foias functional model of a contraction

  8. An embedding of H in H 2 ( D P ∗ ) For a contraction P on H , define W : H → H 2 ( D P ∗ ) by Wx ∼ ( D P ∗ x, D P ∗ P ∗ x, D P ∗ ( P ∗ ) 2 x, . . . ) , Wx ( z ) = D P ∗ (1 − zP ∗ ) − 1 x. For any x ∈ H , � Wx � 2 = � x � 2 − lim N →∞ � ( P ∗ ) N x � 2 . Hence, if P is a ‘pure contraction’, meaning that ( P ∗ ) N tends strongly to zero on H as N → ∞ , then W is an iso- metric embedding of H in H 2 ( D P ∗ ). Moreover WP ∗ x = ( D P ∗ P ∗ x, D P ∗ ( P ∗ ) 2 x, . . . ) = T ∗ z ( D P ∗ x, D P ∗ P ∗ x, . . . ) = T ∗ z Wx where T z denotes the shift operator on H 2 ( D P ∗ ).

  9. A functional model - part 1 Suppose P is a pure contraction. Let E denote the range of W . E is an invariant subspace of H 2 ( D P ∗ ) with respect to T ∗ z . Let U : H → E be the range restriction of W . Thus U is a unitary operator, and P = U ∗ ( T ∗ z |E ) ∗ U = U ∗ ( the compression of T z to E ) U. We need an effective description of the space E = ran W in terms of the operator P .

  10. The characteristic operator function Θ P This is the analytic operator-valued function on D given by Θ P ( λ ) = [ − P + λD P ∗ (1 − λP ∗ ) − 1 D P ] |D P for λ ∈ D . Its values are contractive operators from D P to D P ∗ , and ran W = H 2 ( D P ∗ ) ⊖ Θ P H 2 ( D P ) . The functional model for pure contractions If P is a pure contraction then P is unitarily equivalent to the compression of the shift operator T z on H 2 ( D P ∗ ) to its co-invariant subspace H 2 ( D P ∗ ) ⊖ Θ P H 2 ( D P ) .

  11. Completely non-unitary contractions Consider a contraction P on a Hilbert space H . If P has a nonzero invariant subspace H 1 on which it is isometric then P splits up into a block operator � � P 1 0 P = 0 P 2 with repect to the orthogonal decomposition H 1 ⊕ H ⊥ 1 of H . Here P 1 is a unitary operator, and so, by the Spectral Theorem, � P 1 = T λE (d λ ) for some spectral measure E . P 2 is a c.n.u. contraction : it has no nonzero unitary restric- tion.

  12. The model space H P Let P be a c.n.u contraction on H . Define an operator- valued function on T by 1 ∆ P ( e it ) = [1 − Θ P ( e it ) ∗ Θ P ( e it )] 2 . For almost all t ∈ R , ∆ P ( e it ) is an operator on D P . The model space H P is defined by H 2 ( D P ∗ ) ⊕ ∆ P L 2 ( D P ) Θ P u ⊕ ∆ P u : u ∈ H 2 ( D P ) � � � � H P = ⊖ . H P is a space of functions on T with values in D P ∗ ⊕ D P .

  13. Theorem: the Nagy-Foias functional model Let P be a c.n.u contraction on H . Then P is unitarily equivalent to the operator P on the model space � H 2 ( D P ∗ ) ⊕ ∆ P L 2 ( D P ) � � Θ P u ⊕ ∆ P u : u ∈ H 2 ( D P ) � H P = ⊖ given by P ∗ ( u ⊕ v ) = e − it [ u ( e it ) − u (0)] ⊕ e − it v ( e it ) for all u ⊕ v ∈ H P . P is the Nagy-Foias model of P .

  14. Commuting pairs of contractions Let A and B be c.n.u contractions on a Hilbert space H such that AB = BA . A and B have Nagy-Foias models, but they typically act on different Hilbert spaces. No canonical model is known for the pair ( A, B ). Instead, we exhibit a canonical model for the symmetrization of ( A, B ), meaning the pair of operators ( A + B, AB ). ( A + B, AB ) is called a Γ -contraction .

  15. The symmetrized bidisc: an interesting set in C 2

  16. The symmetrized bidisc The closed symmetrized bidisc is the set Γ def = { ( z + w, zw ) : | z | ≤ 1 , | w | ≤ 1 } . Γ is a non-convex, polynomially convex set in C 2 . Γ is starlike about 0 but not circled. Γ ∩ R 2 is an isosceles triangle together with its interior. The distinguished boundary of Γ is the set b Γ def = { ( z + w, zw ) : | z | = | w | = 1 } , which is homeomorphic to the M¨ obius band.

  17. Magic functions Define a rational function Φ z ( s, p ) of complex numbers z, s, p by Φ z ( s, p ) = 2 zp − s 2 − zs . For any z ∈ D , Φ z maps Γ into D − . Conversely, if ( s, p ) ∈ C 2 is such that | Φ z ( s, p ) | ≤ 1 for all z ∈ D then ( s, p ) ∈ Γ. This observation gives an analytic criterion for membership of Γ.

  18. Γ -analogues of contractions, unitaries and isometries

  19. Γ -contractions A Γ -contraction is a commuting pair ( S, P ) of bounded linear operators (on a Hilbert space H ) for which the symmetrized bidisc Γ def = { ( z + w, zw ) : | z | ≤ 1 , | w | ≤ 1 } is a spectral set. This means that, for all scalar polynomials g in two variables, � g ( S, P ) � ≤ sup | g | . Γ If ( S, P ) is a Γ-contraction then � S � ≤ 2 and � P � ≤ 1 (take g to be a co-ordinate functional). If A, B are commuting contractions then ( A + B, AB ) is a Γ-contraction, by Ando’s inequality.

  20. Examples of Γ -contractions If ( S, P ) is a commuting pair of operators, then ( S, P ) has the form ( A + B, AB ) if and only if S 2 − 4 P is the square of an operator which commutes with S and P . If P is a contraction which has no square root then (0 , P ) is a Γ-contraction that is not of the form ( A + B, AB ) ( S, 0) is a Γ-contraction if and only if w ( S ) ≤ 1, where w is the numerical radius. The pair ( T z 1 + z 2 , T z 1 z 2 ) of analytic Toeplitz operators on H 2 ( D 2 ), restricted to the subspace H 2 sym of symmetric func- tions, is a Γ-contraction that is not of the form ( A + B, AB ).

  21. A characterization of Γ -contractions For operators S, P let ρ ( S, P ) = 1 2 [(2 − S ) ∗ (2 − S ) − (2 P − S ) ∗ (2 P − S )] = 2(1 − P ∗ P ) − S + S ∗ P − S ∗ + P ∗ S. Theorem A commuting pair of operators ( S, P ) is a Γ-contraction if and only if ρ ( αS, α 2 P ) ≥ 0 for all α ∈ D . Necessity: for α ∈ D , Φ α is analytic on a neighbourhood of Γ and | Φ α | ≤ 1 on Γ. Hence, if ( S, P ) is a Γ-contraction, � ∗ � 2 αP − S � 2 αP − S � = 1 − Φ α ( S, P ) ∗ Φ α ( S, P ) ≥ 0 . 1 − 2 − αS 2 − αS

  22. Γ -unitaries For a commuting pair ( S, P ) of operators on H the following statements are equivalent: (1) S and P are normal operators and the joint spectrum σ ( S, P ) lies in the distinguished boundary of Γ; (2) P ∗ P = 1 = PP ∗ and P ∗ S = S ∗ and � S � ≤ 2; (3) S = U 1 + U 2 and P = U 1 U 2 for some commuting pair of unitaries U 1 , U 2 on H . Define a Γ-unitary to be a commuting pair ( S, P ) for which (1)-(3) hold.

  23. Γ -unitary dilations (Agler-Y, 1999, 2000) Theorem Every Γ -contraction has a Γ -unitary dilation. That is, if ( S, P ) is a Γ-contraction on H then there exist Hilbert spaces G ∗ , G and a Γ-unitary (˜ S, ˜ P ) on G ∗ ⊕ H ⊕ G having block operator matrices of the forms     ∗ 0 0 ∗ 0 0 ˜ ˜ S ∼ ∗ S 0  , P ∼ ∗ P 0  .       ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ For any polynomial f in two variables, f ( S, P ) is the com- pression to H of f (˜ S, ˜ P ). Thus (˜ S, ˜ P ) is a dilation of ( S, P ).

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend