a endance areas 2018 19 listening input sessions
play

A"endance Areas 2018-19+ Listening & Input Sessions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A"endance Areas 2018-19+ Listening & Input Sessions September 14, 2017 & October 23, 2017 Welcome Thanks Purpose Provide feedback to help the superintendent make recommendaAons to the school board about aBendance areas


  1. A"endance Areas 2018-19+ Listening & Input Sessions September 14, 2017 & October 23, 2017

  2. Welcome • Thanks • Purpose • Provide feedback to help the superintendent make recommendaAons to the school board about aBendance areas and intra-district transfers • To provide the School Board with informaAon to make final decisions • Opportunity to ask quesAons and provide wriBen feedback • Format • Changes since 9/14/17 • PresentaAon 15-20 minutes • Q & A… as many as possible • QuesAon/Feedback cards available • ABendance Area Task Force will collect and organize quesAons • ABendance Area Task Force will ask quesAons • Website • QuesAons aTer the session.. Email, call, other • LogisAcs.. Website, handouts, scenarios, criteria • Post-meeAng availability • Videotaped • IntroducAons of others

  3. Listening & Input Session updates • FAQ updated to reflect quesAons • Start Ames • Criteria importance • Decision making objecAvity of the board • Principal Assignments • Building Upgrades • Video of session was posted online • Decision to allow intra-district transfers with parameters – more on this later.

  4. Updates since 9/14/17 • Haven Ridge Development • Villa homes (76) and Single Family Homes (57) – Prior Lake area of district • Pearson students will ALL feed in to East Middle School • Ladybug Childcare center (152 child capacity, 40 school age) • Downtown development cancelled • Canterbury Commons update • AddiAonal study of Middle School CapaciAes • True Feeder School Model

  5. Intra-District Transfers (update since 9/14/17) • Allow requests when possible, subject to: Transfer request 7meline • Capacity Calculate impact of requests & projected • Staffing school enrollment versus school capacity. Approve where possible (leave some room for • Childcare requests approved (as in the past) growth & childcare within aBendance area. All requests Ame stamped, class size consideraAons) • “Batching” of preference requests with specified deadlines March 1: Request form available • Example: Check impact of all requests received by April 1: Batch processing #1 a set date/dates May 1: Batch processing #2 • A deadline where no further requests would be June 1: Batch processing #3 approved due to staffing/planning implicaAons July 15: Batch processing #4* • Bussing not provided outside of the a2endance area. Approved transfer requests would not come with bussing. • Requests re-done annually (sAll under * Required Ame for schedule creaAon and staffing needs of the schools. consideraAon)

  6. Ke Key Why? EC – Eagle Creek JA – Jackson P – Pearson RO – Red Oak SP – Sun Path SW - Sweeney 2002-03 t 2002-03 to 2006-07 (5 y 2006-07 (5 year ears) s) • 3 Elementary Schools • P, RO, SW (K-4 only) • Sun Path (5 - 6 only) • 4,250 students (Spring ‘02) • 7-9 Jr. High (East) • 10-12 High School (West)

  7. Ke Key EC – Eagle Creek, JA – Jackson, P – Pearson, RO – Red Oak, SP – Sun Path, SW - Sweeney 2007-08 t 2007-08 to 2011-12 (5 yr 2011-12 (5 yrs) s) • 5 Elementary Schools • P/JA*, RO, SW, SP, EC (new) • SP converted, all Elem K-5 • 5,726 students (Spring ‘07) • ~1,476 addiMonal students • 6-7 Middle School (East) • 8-9 Jr. High (West) • 10-12 High School (new)

  8. Key Ke EC – Eagle Creek, JA – Jackson, P – Pearson, RO – Red Oak, SP – Sun Path, SW - Sweeney 2011-12-13 to 2017-18 (6-7 yr 2011-12-13 t 2017-18 (6-7 yrs) s) • 5 Elementary Schools • EC, JA, RO, SP, SW • P converted (6 th only) • 7,236 students (Spring ‘12) • ~1,510 addiMonal students • New HS opens (10-12) • P6 opens (6 th only) • EJH & WJH open as 7 th – 9 th • * Spring ’17 ~8,300 students • ~1,060 addiMonal students

  9. Why? 2011-12-13 to 2017-18 (6-7 yr 2011-12-13 t 2017-18 (6-7 yrs) s) • 5 Elementary Schools 2002-03 t 2002-03 to 2006-07 (5 y 2006-07 (5 year ears) s) • EC, JA, RO, SP, SW • 3 Elementary Schools 2007-08 t 2007-08 to 2011-12 (5 yr 2011-12 (5 yrs) s) • P converted (6 th only) • P, RO, SW (K-4 only) • 5 Elementary Schools • 7,236 students (Spring ‘12) • Sun Path (5 - 6 only) • P/JA*, RO, SW, SP, EC (new) • ~1,510 addiMonal students • 4,250 students (Spring ‘02) • SP converted, all Elem K-5 • New HS opens (10-12) • 5,726 students (Spring ‘07) • 7-9 Jr. High (East) • P6 opens (6 th only) • ~1,476 addiMonal students • 10-12 High School (West) • EJH & WJH open as 7 th – 9 th • 6-7 Middle School (East) • * Spring ’17 ~8,300 students • 8-9 Jr. High (West) • ~1,060 addiMonal students • 10-12 High School (new)

  10. Today’s Reality 0-5+ year discussion Process ü • Convert 6 th grade center back • The 2018-19 TransiAon plan requires q School Board establishes aBendance to an elementary aBendance areas be re-drawn. area parameters ü • Convert High School to • ABendance areas will be developed q Proposed scenarios developed 9 th -12 th grades based on school board parameters. ü q School Board selects “best” working • Convert Jr. High Schools (7 th • Pearson transiAons back to its original scenario(s) by DATE 7/24/2017 – 9 th ) to Middle Schools (6 th design as an elementary school. ü q ABendance Area Task Force Study & -8 th ) • Middle School areas will incorporate Review DATE(S) August 15 & 24, • Current Elementary schools, “feeder” elementary schools if 2017. over capacity, as anAcipated. possible. Feedback reviewed… scenario • • These changes while planned for, and updated if necessary. posiAve, are challenging as well. ü q Public Listening & Input Session ABachments to current schools are DATE(S) September 14, 2017. real, and the change will be difficult for some. Feedback reviewed … scenario • updated if necessary. q Public Listening & Input Session DATE(S) October 23, 2017 Feedback reviewed … scenario • updated if necessary. q Final Approval by School Board DATE 11/13/17.

  11. Process to date • Winter 2017 Board MeeAng(s): IniAal discussions on aBendance area criteria & process • April 24 School Board MeeAng: Criteria and Ameline discussion • May 22 School Board MeeAng: IniAal scenarios presented, discussions on Ameline, intra-district transfers, start Ames, process • June 26 School Board MeeAng: Updated scenarios presented, discussion on walking paBerns • July 10 School Board MeeAng: Updates scenarios, request for new scenario with goal of developing 3 for iniAal discussions with task force • July 24 School Board MeeAng: 3 scenarios presented and decision to use them as starAng point for task force work. • ABendance Area InformaAon site made live on district website • Public communicaAon via board reports throughout, and request for input on 3 scenarios • August 15 & 24 ABendance Area Task Force meeAngs • September 14 & October 23 Public Listening & Input Sessions • November 13 School Board makes final decision

  12. Special Thanks…. A"endance Area Task Force • Parents from all Elementary Schools • Early Childhood Parents • City of Shakopee Planner • Bus Company RepresentaAve • Childcare Provider RepresentaAve • School Board Members • Administrators from Early Childhood through Jr. High • District Office – Superintendent, CommunicaAons, Data & TesAng

  13. A"endance Area Task Force Members • Dave Orlowsky, staff • Molly Dose, parent • Megan Mulder, parent • Faduma Yusuf, parent • Brenda Kauhane, parent • Gary Anger, Interim Superintendent • Maria Weness, parent • Dofa Mohamed, parent • Ashley McCray, staff • Kelli Ulrich, parent • Angela Tucker, school board • Crystal McNally, staff • Kjersta Hoffman, parent • ScoB Swanson, school board • Pat Huber, Palmer Bus • Liesl Bell-Fleming, parent- • Reggie Bowerman, school board teacher • KaAe Johnson, staff-parent • Mitch Perrine, principal • Kim Graff, parent • Eric Weiss, City of Shakopee • Patrick Leonard, principal • Anab Sahal, parent • Roz Addler, childcare provider • Melissa Zahn, principal • Larissa Indrebo, parent • Jim Miklausich, principal • Alison Rahn, parent • Nick Hoffman, parent

  14. Decision Making Consultants Design Stakeholders District Office – School Community-Parents-Task Board - Superintendent Force Decision Makers School Board - Superintendent Adjust/Refine Implementa7on New informaAon

  15. Criteria/parameters per School Board and prior pracAce • Geographic: Walking distance to school per district guidelines/policy • Demographic Balance • TransportaAon: Efficient, effecAve, cost factors…. Bus company review of impact • Building capacity • RecogniAon of proposed growth/developments • Feeder schools if possible (Elementary to Middle) • Monitoring number of students moved • Lasts 3-5 years … beBer 5-7 years

  16. Eagle Creek Jackson Red Oak Sun Path Sweeney

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend