75 th Street Path Project Feasibility Study Presentation Presented - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
75 th street path project
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

75 th Street Path Project Feasibility Study Presentation Presented - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 01, 2024 388 likes •539 views

75 th Street Path Project Feasibility Study Presentation Presented By: William Hall, P.E. CrossRoad Engineers, PC 3417 Sherman Drive Beech Grove, IN 46107 WHY THIS PROJECT? IMPROVE QUALITY OF LIFE Public Safety Connectivity and

slide-1
SLIDE 1

75th Street Path Project

Feasibility Study Presentation

Presented By: William Hall, P.E. CrossRoad Engineers, PC 3417 Sherman Drive Beech Grove, IN 46107

slide-2
SLIDE 2

IMPROVE QUALITY OF LIFE

  • Public Safety
  • Connectivity and Access - Walkability
  • Traffic Benefits
  • Health Benefits
  • Social Benefits
  • Increased Property Values
  • Lower Crime Rates

DESIRED AMENITY

WHY THIS PROJECT?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

OPTIMAL LOCATION

  • Town of Meridian Hills Thoroughfare
  • Maximize Service Area of the Path
  • Centrally Located
  • Extend Across the Town’s Boundaries

WHY 75TH STREET?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

WHY 75TH STREET?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

WHY 75TH STREET?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

OPTIMAL LOCATION

  • Town of Meridian Hills Thoroughfare
  • Maximize Service Area of the Path
  • Centrally Located
  • Extend Across the Town’s Boundaries
  • Connectivity and Access

WHY 75TH STREET?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

WHY 75TH STREET?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

OPTIMAL LOCATION

  • Town of Meridian Hills Thoroughfare
  • Maximize Service Area
  • Connectivity and Access
  • Supplement Existing 75th Street Bike Lanes

WHY 75TH STREET?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PROMOTE USER SAFETY

  • Minimize Conflict between Users and Vehicles

MINIMIZE COST

  • R/W Needs - Utility Relocations - Topography/Drainage

Impacts

DATA DRIVEN ANALYSIS

  • Parcel Feasibility:

NW Quad = 88% NE Quad = 63% SW Quad = 11% SE Quad = 13%

WHY THE NORTH SIDE?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

RECOMMENDED DESIGN BASED ON:

  • National Design Guidelines
  • Anticipated Users and Town Needs
  • Best Engineering Practice

RECOMMENDED DESIGN ELEMENTS:

  • Path Material:

Asphalt

  • Path Width:

10 ft. (desired) / 8 ft. (minimum)

  • Path Separation:

6 ft. (desired)

  • Path Shoulder:

3-5 ft. (desired) / 2 ft. (minimum)

  • Half R/W Width:

35 ft. (desired)

WHAT WILL IT LOOK LIKE?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

WHAT WILL IT LOOK LIKE?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

WHAT WILL IT LOOK LIKE?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

PRELIMINARY PROJECTED BUDGET:

  • $1,700,000 +
  • Based on Estimated Construction, Survey, Design, and Inspection Costs

ANTICIPATED PROJECT FUNDING:

  • State and Local Grant Funding
  • Resident Donations
  • Town Budget

EXPECTED LIFE-CYCLE:

  • 15 – 20 Years

75TH STREET PATH STUDY

slide-14
SLIDE 14

75TH STREET PATH STUDY

QUESTIONS?