4 bits are conveyed by QPSK modulating the sequences S1 and S2. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

4 bits are conveyed by qpsk modulating the sequences s1
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

4 bits are conveyed by QPSK modulating the sequences S1 and S2. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

January 1999 doc.: IEEE 802.11-99/019a IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs An Improved Rate Signalling Date: January 11, 1999 Author: Naftali Chayat and Tal Kaitz BreezeCom Atidim Technology Park, Tel Aviv 61131 Israel Phone: 972 3-6456262


slide-1
SLIDE 1

January 1999 doc.: IEEE 802.11-99/019a

Submission page 1 Tal Kaitz and Naftali Chayat, BreezeCOM

IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs An Improved Rate Signalling

Date: January 11, 1999 Author: Naftali Chayat and Tal Kaitz BreezeCom Atidim Technology Park, Tel Aviv 61131 Israel Phone: 972 –3-6456262 Fax: 972-3-6546290 e-Mail: {Talk, Naftalic}@ Breezecom.co.il

An Improved Rate Signalling

  • The reliability of the rate-signaling scheme is crucial for the

performance of the 802.11a Wireless LAN.

  • We propose a new reliable scheme based on bi-orthogonal

Hadamard coding and OFDM modulation.

  • No overhead relative to current scheme
  • Simple to implement.
slide-2
SLIDE 2

January 1999 doc.: IEEE 802.11-99/019a

Submission page 2 Tal Kaitz and Naftali Chayat, BreezeCOM

Overview of current scheme Coarse Frequency Offset Est., Timing Sync Signal Detect, AGC, diversity sel. SIGNAL Channel and Fine Frequency Offset Estimation t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 GI T1 S1 S2 GI t1 T2 t8 t9 t10 Data 1 7*0.8 µs = 5.6 µs 1.6 µs +2*3.2 µs = 8.0 µs 0.8 µs 2*0.8 µs = 1.6 µs 0.8 µs +3.2 µs = 4.0 µs 4.0 µs DATA 5.6 µs +8.0 µs +2.4 µs +1.6 µs =17.6 µs GI t1 Data 2

  • 4 bits are conveyed by QPSK modulating the sequences S1 and

S2.

  • t10 serves as a guard interval.
  • Overall length 0.8uS+0.8uS+0.8uS=2.4uS.
  • In AWGN: same error rate as rate ½ BPSK OFDM. (6Mb/s).
  • Non satisfactory performance under severe multipath conditions.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

January 1999 doc.: IEEE 802.11-99/019a

Submission page 3 Tal Kaitz and Naftali Chayat, BreezeCOM

Proposed Scheme

Coarse Frequency

Offset Est., Timing Sync Signal Detect, AGC, diversity sel.

SIGNAL

Channel and Fine Frequency Offset Estimation

t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 GI T1 S1 GI t1 T2 t8 t9 Data 1

7*0.8 µs = 5.6 µs 1.6 µs +2*3.2 µs = 8.0 µs 0.8 µs 2*0.8 µs = 1.6 µs 0.8 µs +3.2 µs = 4.0 µs 4.0 µs

DATA

5.6 µs +8.0 µs +2.4 µs +1.6 µs =17.6 µs

GI t1 Data 2 GI t1

  • 4 bits are conveyed by the sequence S1 spanning 1.6uS.
  • Additional guard interval of 0.8uS.
  • Overall length 2.4uS – same as before.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

January 1999 doc.: IEEE 802.11-99/019a

Submission page 4 Tal Kaitz and Naftali Chayat, BreezeCOM

Coding and Modulation

  • 3 LSB select one row of Hadamard 8 matrix.
  • The MSB selects sign.
  • The 8 binary symbols are repeated 3 times to form 24 vector.
  • The vector is multiplied with a cover sequence.
  • The result is used to modulate the even subcarriers of a 64 point

OFDM symbol. The time domain vector has two identical halves.

  • The time domain vector is cyclically extended and a window is applied

to truncate it to length 2.4uS.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

January 1999 doc.: IEEE 802.11-99/019a

Submission page 5 Tal Kaitz and Naftali Chayat, BreezeCOM

Decoding and Demodulation

  • The 32 samples signal is cyclically extended to provide 64 samples.
  • A 64-point FFT is used to demodulate.
  • The even subcarriers are multiplied by the cover sequence.
  • The subcarriers are combined to produce an 8-point vector.
  • A Fast Hadamard Transform is applied.
  • The location of peak determines 3 MSBs. The sign of the peak

determines the MSB.

  • Both modulation and demodulation require existing H/W: namely the

64 point FFT/IFFT

  • Coding and decoding require an 8 point fast Hadamard transform.
slide-6
SLIDE 6

January 1999 doc.: IEEE 802.11-99/019a

Submission page 6 Tal Kaitz and Naftali Chayat, BreezeCOM

Performance in flat AWGN

  • Let Es denote the power per spectral line.
  • Then for rate ½ k=7 BPSK we have d2

free=10*4Es=40Es.

  • For bi-orthogonal coding we have d2

free=2*8*3*Es=48Es.

The bi-orthogonal scheme is better by 0.8dB than the coding scheme

  • f the data section.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

January 1999 doc.: IEEE 802.11-99/019a

Submission page 7 Tal Kaitz and Naftali Chayat, BreezeCOM

Performance in severe multipath

Simulation results: 64bytes packets, 6Mb/s. Green : errors in rate field. Blue: errors in data.

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10

  • 2

10

  • 1

10 EbNo [dB] Error rate Rate error and data errors. Trms = 200 nSec 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 10

  • 2

10

  • 1

10 EbNo [dB] Error rate Rate error and data errors. Trms = 600 nSec

slide-8
SLIDE 8

January 1999 doc.: IEEE 802.11-99/019a

Submission page 8 Tal Kaitz and Naftali Chayat, BreezeCOM

Peak to Average Power Ratio The cover sequence assures good PAP ratios for all codewords.

Codeword PAP [dB] 1 3.2 dB 2 3.7 dB 3 4.6 dB 4 3.7 dB 5 3.2 dB 6 4.2 dB 7 4.6 dB 8 3.7 dB

PAP = 3.2dB… 4.6dB.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

January 1999 doc.: IEEE 802.11-99/019a

Submission page 9 Tal Kaitz and Naftali Chayat, BreezeCOM

Extension to 5 bits

  • Due to the proliferation of codes and data rates, (1/3 , 9/16 etc.) there

is a need to convey more then 4 bits.

  • The proposed scheme can be easily extended to support 5 bits.
  • Performed by QPSK modulating the H8 row.
  • Decoding by complex 8-point FHT.
  • Same minimum free distance of 48*Es. Double number of minimum

distance neighbours => Slight degradation in performance.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

January 1999 doc.: IEEE 802.11-99/019a

Submission page 10 Tal Kaitz and Naftali Chayat, BreezeCOM

Conclusions

  • A reliable method for transmitting the 4 bits of the rate field.
  • Requires no overhead relative to the current scheme.
  • Much lower error rate than the data section even in the most reliable

mode, both under flat channel and under severe multipath conditions.

  • Simple to implement. Uses existing modulation and demodulation

mechanisms.

  • Requires Fast Hadamard Transform to be implemented.

Simple extension to 5 bits.