SLIDE 3 3/8/2011 3
Comparative Nutritive Value of Grasses, Forbs, and Shrubs
During growing season - forbs are more nutritious than
grasses (which are more nutritious than shrubs).
This is because the cell wall of grasses is thicker than the cell wall
During dormant season - browse are important for
nutrients.
C3 vs C4 Grasses
Tropical grasses (C4) are less nutritious than temperate grasses (C3) because they (C3) because they contain more schlerenchyma, epidermis, vascular tissue and cell walls are more lignified.
Comparative Nutritive Value of Grasses, Forbs, and Shrubs
Energy - graph by Parker 1969
Comparative Nutritive Value of Grasses, Forbs, and Shrubs
During growing season - grasses, forbs, and shrubs all provide
good amounts of energy
Durgingdormant season - grasses provide a stable source of
energy.
Environmental Influences of Plant Nutritive Quality:
T
emperature:
Higher temperatures - decrease water soluble CHO's and protein
levels.
Liginification and maturation occur more quickly at elevated
temperatures.
Moisture:
Moderate moisture stress increases the nutritive value of plants by
delaying maturation.
Severe moisture stress hastens translocation of nutrients to the
roots and senescence.
Range Site:
- Fertile soils may delay maturity and increase leaf:stem ratios.
High level of soil Nitrogen may increase protein content of plants.
Anti-quality Agents:
Most common in shrubs and forbs. (Rarely a problem in
grasses).
Inhibitors - may cuase illness but also inhibit digestion.
Tannins - React with dietary proteins to form complexes resistent to
microbial degradation.
Phenolic - also decrease protein digestibility. Essential Oils - can inhibit digestion (CHO's and protein by inhibiting
microbial growth).
Toxins - cause illness or death (ie. alkoloides).