28 28 yea ear o old Basketbal all Pl Player er w with 2c 2cm - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

28 28 yea ear o old basketbal all pl player er w with 2c
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

28 28 yea ear o old Basketbal all Pl Player er w with 2c 2cm - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

28 28 yea ear o old Basketbal all Pl Player er w with 2c 2cm MFC d C defec ect, st post Men eniscec ectom omy 5 5 yea ears a ago: o: MACI is the answer in 7 minutes Christian Lattermann, MD Professor Vice-Chair Clinical


slide-1
SLIDE 1

28 28 yea ear o

  • ld Basketbal

all Pl Player er w with 2c 2cm MFC d C defec ect, st post Men eniscec ectom

  • my 5

5 yea ears a ago:

  • :

“MACI is the answer” in 7 minutes

Christian Lattermann, MD Professor Vice-Chair Clinical Research University of Kentucky

slide-2
SLIDE 2

I do have financial disclosures to make

  • Industry:
  • Vericel: Consultant
  • Cartiheal: Consultant
  • Samumed: Consultant
  • Novartis: Consultant
  • Smith&Nephew : Institutional Support
  • Current Grant Support:
  • NIH-NIAMS: 1K23AR060275-01A1 (2012-2017)
  • Editorial Board Memberships:
  • Cartilage
  • Journal of Sports Rehabilitation
  • The Knee
  • Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Reviewer for Journals:
  • AJSM, CORR, JKS, O&C, Orthopaedics,
  • Patents:
  • 09/561,524 ;PCT/EP98/06849
slide-3
SLIDE 3

This is Vegas and the gloves are off!

  • this is a totally biased presentation
  • I love Bill Bugbee and Kevin Bonner
  • Bugbee is a nice guy, but helpless when

he does not have a bone plug

  • Bonner is a saint, no matter how hard I

try, I cannot find anything on him

  • Just assume that I am right, because this

is Plancher’s meeting and he said so!

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Activity level:

High impact sports

Comorbidities:

meniscectomy 5 years ago => likely tolerated well

Alignment: neutral or valgus 2cm2 in large knee maybe a small defect

Bissel et al, BMJ 2008

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Ideal lesion characteristics: 2-10cm2
  • Ideal age: 18-40
  • Excellent track record in high level athletes

This is precisely what MACI is made for and I have 10 year data to prove it!

  • Why would I want to violate the subchondral bone?
  • Why would I use a product that has no track record?
  • Why would I use a technique that has failed us

multiple times reliably in high level athletes?

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Why destroy subchondral bone if not necessary?
  • Stick with the first line cellular technique that

has proven short and long term outcomes equal if not better than OCA

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • I do not like to rely on magic and good will to

address a treatable problem such as this.

  • Stick with what is tried and true, even if it may

look less flashy and easy

Be real! There is no Magic!

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Scope needed:
  • No big deal, most chondral lesions require a previous scope

inspection

  • Glued patch:
  • Easy handling, no sutures any longer
  • Small arthrotomy:
  • Mini-arthrotomy, enlarged portal
  • 30 minute surgery
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Cell based:

  • in this case indicated and first line

Allograft:

  • is not a first line procedure unless subchondral bone is

involved

Autograft:

  • not indicated for this size,
  • Donor site morbidity

Marrow stimulation:

  • History of early failure
  • Microfx +: “Cartilage Voodoo”
slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Manage Expectations
  • Avoid linear thinking
  • Be honest with your patient
  • Do not succumb to “helperism”
  • Be familiar with your techniques
  • Look at data!
slide-11
SLIDE 11