2010 LCR Study Humboldt and North Coast/ North Bay Jazmin Pierce - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2010 lcr study humboldt and north coast north bay
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2010 LCR Study Humboldt and North Coast/ North Bay Jazmin Pierce - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2010 LCR Study Humboldt and North Coast/ North Bay Jazmin Pierce Regional Transmission Engineer Stakeholder Meeting April 14, 2009 Humboldt and North Coast/North Bay Areas Humboldt Load and Resources (MW) 2010 Load = 200 Transmission


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2010 LCR Study Humboldt and North Coast/ North Bay

Jazmin Pierce Regional Transmission Engineer Stakeholder Meeting April 14, 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Humboldt and North Coast/North Bay Areas

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Humboldt Load and Resources (MW)

2010

Slide 3

Load = 200 Transmission Losses = 9 Total Load = 209 Market Generation = 135 Muni Generation = QF/Self-Gen Generation = 48 Total Qualifying Capacity = 183

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Critical Contingencies Humboldt Area

Slide 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Critical Contingencies Humboldt Area

Humboldt Overall – Category B

Contingency: The outage of Bridgeville-Cottonwood 115 kV line with

  • ne of the Humboldt Bay units out of service

LCR need: 179 MW (including 45 MW of QF/Self generation) Limiting component: Reactive margin within Humboldt

Slide 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Changes

Since last year:

1) Total LCR need has increased by 2 MW mainly because load growth (2 MW higher)

Slide 6

Since our last stakeholder meeting:

1) New Humboldt Bay repowering project is been removed because the in service date has been moved out past winter of 2010 2) Updated NQC

For written comments, please send to: RegionalTransmission@caiso.com

Your comments and questions are welcome. Your comments and questions are welcome.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

North Coast/Bay Load and Resources (MW)

2010

Slide 7

Load = 1549 Transmission Losses = 65 Total Load = 1614 Market Generation = 736 Muni Generation = 131 QF Generation = 18 Total Qualifying Capacity = 885

slide-8
SLIDE 8

North Coast and North Bay

Slide 8

Vaca Dixon Tulucay Lakeville Sobrante Ignacio Fulton

Sonoma Corona

Cortina

230 kV 230 kV 230 kV 230 kV 230 kV 230 kV 230 kV

115 kV 115 kV 115 kV 115 kV Kekawaka Laytonville 60 kV 60 kV

Eagle Rock Pocket Lakeville Pocket

Eagle Rock

115 kV

Fulton Pocket

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Eagle Rock Sub-Area

Eagle Rock Sub-area – Category C Contingency: Eagle Rock-Silverado- Fulton 115 kV line and Cortina #4 230/115 kV bank. LCR need: 240 MW (includes 3 MW of QF/Muni generation and 3 MW of deficiency) Limiting component: Thermal overload on Fulton-Hopland 60 kV line Eagle Rock Sub-area – Category B Contingency: Cortina #4 230/115 kV bank. LCR need: 120 MW (includes 3 MW of QF/Muni generation) Limiting component: Thermal overload on Fulton-Hopland 60 kV line

Slide 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Fulton and Lakeville Sub-areas

Fulton Sub-area – Category C Contingency: Lakeville-Ignacio #1 230 kV line and Crocket-Sobrante #1 230 kV line. LCR need: 559 MW (includes 17 of QF and 64 MW of Muni generation) Limiting component: Thermal overload on Fulton-Lakeville #1 230 kV line

Slide 10

Lakeville Sub-area (NC/NB Overall) – Category B Contingency: Vaca Dixon-Lakeville 230 kV line and DEC power plant out

  • f service

LCR need: 700 MW (includes 149 MW of QF/Muni generation) Limiting component: Thermal overloads on the Vaca Dixon-Tulucay 230 kV line

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Changes

Since last year:

1) Load forecast is up by 18 MW 2) Total LCR need has decreased by 66 MW mainly because

  • f Lakeville sub-area decrease

Slide 11

Since our last stakeholder meeting:

1) Fulton sub-area – revert back to the worst contingency from last year 2) Lakeville sub-area – need has been decreased due to higher needs in the Pittsburg and Oakland sub-areas 3) Moved some units from QF to Market status 4) Updated NQC Your comments and questions are welcome. Your comments and questions are welcome.

For written comments, please send to: RegionalTransmission@caiso.com