2 SECTION 4 - FINANCIAL UPDATE SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION 4.1 Q3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
2 SECTION 4 - FINANCIAL UPDATE SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION 4.1 Q3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
THIS PRESENTATION AND ITS CONTENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION This presentation has been prepared for information purposes only. Certain information guarantees of future performance or results. Those risks and
2
This presentation has been prepared for information purposes only. Certain information in this presentation contains forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws (also known as forward-looking statements) including, among
- thers, statements made or implied relating to Pure Multi-Family REIT LP (“Pure Multi-
Family”) and its objectives, strategies to achieve those objectives, beliefs, plans, estimates, projections and intentions; and similar statements concerning anticipated future events, results, circumstances, performance or expectations that are not historical facts. Forward- looking statements generally can be identified by words such as “outlook”, “believe”, “expect”, “may”, “anticipate”, “should”, “intend”, “estimates” and similar expressions. In particular, certain statements in this presentation discuss Pure Multi-Family’s anticipated future events. These statements include, but are not limited to: (i) Pure Multi-Family’s growth strategy, including the accretive acquisition of properties and the anticipated extent of the accretion of any acquisitions, which could be impacted by demand for properties and the effect that demand has on acquisition capitalization rates and changes in the cost of capital; (ii) maintaining occupancy levels and rental revenue, which could be impacted by changes in demand for Pure Multi-Family’s properties, financial circumstances of tenants, including tenant defaults, the effects of general economic conditions and supply of competitors’ properties in proximity to Pure Multi-Family’s properties; (iii) overall indebtedness levels, which could be impacted by the level of acquisition activity Pure Multi-Family is able to achieve, fair value of its properties and future financing opportunities; (iv) tax status of Pure US Apartments REIT Inc., which can be impacted by regulatory changes enacted by governmental authorities; (v) anticipated distributions and payout ratios, which could be impacted by capital expenditures, results of operations and capital resource allocation decisions; (vi) obtaining and maintaining adequate insurance for Pure Multi-Family’s properties; and (vii) anticipated interest rates and exchange rates. Forward-looking statements are provided for the purpose of presenting information about management’s current expectations and plans relating to the future and readers are cautioned that such statements may not be appropriate for other purposes. Forward- looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties and should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results. Those risks and uncertainties include, among
- ther things, risks related to: unit prices; liquidity; credit risk and tenant concentration;
interest rate and other debt related risk; tax risk; ability to access capital markets; lease rollover risk; competition for real property investments; environmental matters; changes in legislation; and indebtedness of Pure Multi-Family. Management believes that the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions and information currently available, which include, management’s current expectations, estimates and assumptions that: proposed acquisitions will be completed on the terms and basis agreed to by Pure Multi-Family, property acquisition and disposition prospects and opportunities will be consistent with Pure Multi-Family’s experience over the past 12 months, the multi-family residential real estate market in the “Sunbelt” region in the United States will remain strong, the global economic environment will remain stable, interest rates will remain at current levels, and Pure Multi-Family’s business strategy, plans, outlook, projections, targets and operating costs will be consistent with Pure Multi-Family’s experience over the past 12 months, Pure Multi-Family will be able to maintain occupancy at current levels, tenants will not default
- n lease terms, governmental regulations and taxation will not change to adversely affect
Pure Multi-Family’s business and financial results, and Pure Multi-Family will be able to
- btain adequate insurance and financing; however, management can give no assurance
that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of factors that may affect future results is not
- exhaustive. When relying on forward-looking statements to make decisions with respect
to Pure Multi-Family, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties and potential events. For more information on these and other factors, please refer to the “Risk Factors” section in Pure Multi-Family’s annual information form and other continuous disclosure documents filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this presentation and Pure Multi-Family assumes no obligation to update or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances, except as required by applicable securities laws.
THIS PRESENTATION AND ITS CONTENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
3
SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION 1.1 Pure Multi-Family REIT LP ..................................................... 5 1.2 2017 Achievements to Date ................................................... 6 1.3 Portfolio Growth Strategy ...................................................... 7 SECTION 2 - MARKET & ECONOMIC OVERVIEW 2.1 Strong Demand for Multi-Family Rentals .............................. 9 2.2 US vs Canada Deal Flow ....................................................... 10 2.3 Sunbelt Growth Continues ................................................... 11 2.4 Property Acquisition Strategy .............................................. 12 SECTION 3 - PURE MULTI-FAMILY PORTFOLIO 3.1 Q3 Portfolio Overview ......................................................... 14 3.2 Texas Triangle ...................................................................... 15 3.3 Dallas, TX .............................................................................. 16 3.4 Recycling Capital .................................................................. 17 3.5 PURE Farmers Market, Dallas, TX ........................................ 18 SECTION 4 - FINANCIAL UPDATE 4.1 Q3 2017 Financial Snapshot ................................................. 20 4.2 Property Management Internalization ................................ 21 4.3 Deleveraging the Statement of Financial Position .............. 22 4.4 Debt Maturities .................................................................... 23 4.5 Supply ................................................................................... 24 4.6 Adjusted Funds From Operations ........................................ 25 4.7 Same Store Results .............................................................. 26 4.8 Strong Rent Growth with Stable Occupancy ....................... 27 SECTION 5 - SUMMARY 5.1 Outlook ................................................................................ 29 5.2 Total Returns Since IPO ........................................................ 30 APPENDICES A Current Portfolio ..................................................................... 32 B Capex vs Maintenance Reserves ............................................. 33 C Texas Property Tax Process .................................................... 34 D Analyst Coverage .................................................................... 35
4
Brackenridge, San Antonio, TX
5
Pure Multi-Family is a Canadian-based publically traded vehicle which offers investors exclusive exposure to attractive, fully- integrated institutional quality U.S. multi- family real estate assets.
Experienced Real Estate Professionals Track Record of Creating Wealth For Investors Internalized and Vertically Aligned Asset and Property Management MANAGEMENT TEAM
Steve Evans
Chief Executive Officer
Samantha Adams
Senior Vice President
Scott Shillington
Chief Financial Officer
Andrew Greig
Vice President, Investor Relations
Lee Ann Neumann
Executive Vice President, US Operations
MAJOR MARKETS OF THE US SUNBELT
Potential Future Markets
Phoenix AZ
TX NV CO
FL GA NC Dallas Houston San Antonio Austin
Atlanta Orlando Tampa Charlotte Raleigh
Denver Las Vegas
Miami
CA NM OR WA MT ID WY UT ND SD NE KS OK MO IA MN KY IL IN OH WV VA WI AR LA MS AL SC TN PA MI MI NY ME
NH VT MA CT NJ
Current Portfolio
1 For the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
6
Acquired 6 properties valued at USD$272 million and improved the average age of the portfolio. Filed a US$500M base shelf prospectus and completed two equity raises for a total CAD$184 million. Decreased Debt to Gross Book Value ratio from 55.2% at December 31, 2016 to 50.8% at September 30, 2017. Internalized property management function at no external fee to unitholders. Established the Pure Management regional
- ffice in Dallas TX.
Filed a Normal Course Issuer Bid.
Amalfi, Dallas, TX
7
Build an institutional quality multi- family apartment portfolio in the major markets of the US Sunbelt. Create value at our properties through active management. Enhance portfolio quality by recycling capital through timely dispositions of select older properties. Maintain a prudent capital structure and conservative financial profile.
PURE Farmers Market, Dallas, TX
8
Walker Commons, Houston, TX
9
U.S. home
- wnership rates
remain low.
Quarterly Homeownership Rates and Seasonally Adjusted Homeownership Rates - United States: 1995 - 2017
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey, October 31, 2017, Recession data: National Bureau of Economic Research, <www.nber.org>
Over 60% of Millennials choose to rent. Long-term rental demand projected.
Millennials Population - Aged 20-34 (Millions) 1
1 Source: Witten Advisors
10
Source: CBRE Source: Real Capital Analytics * Exchange rate of 0.78 or 1.27 as at November 22, 2017.
Canadian Apartment Sales in 2016 US Apartment Sales by Market in 2016
Our target US apartment markets have over 10x the sales volume when compared to the entire Canadian apartment market.
The US tax advantage creates dynamic growth potential in comparison to Canadian peers.
Existing Markets Volume (USD $Billions) Volume (CAD $Billions)* Austin 4.3 5.4 Dallas 9.4 11.9 Houston 5.1 6.4 Phoenix 5.2 6.6 San Antonio 1.7 2.1 Existing markets 25.6 32.5 Target Markets Volume (USD $Billions) Volume (CAD $Billions)* Atlanta 8.7 11.0 Charlotte 2.6 3.3 Orlando 2.7 3.4 Raleigh/Durham 1.9 2.5 Tampa 2.9 3.6 Denver 6.7 8.5 Target markets 25.5 32.4 Volume (USD $Billions) Volume (CAD $Billions)* Total US Apartment Sales 51.1 64.8 Asset Class Volume (CAD $Billions) Total Canadian Apartment Sales 5.7
11
Source: Oxford Economics Source: Oxford Economics
EMPLOYMENT GROWTH PROJECTIONS
Ranked by Job Growth from 2017 to 2021 Rank MSA Change Annualized 1 New York-Newark-Jersey City 208,658 52,165
2 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 139,649 34,912
3
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
135,991 33,998
4 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land 121,274 30,319
5
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria
97,343 24,336 6
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
88,698 22,175
7 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale 87,851 21,963
8
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach
79,856 19,964 9
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
72,381 18,095 10
San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward
70,366 17,592 11
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
61,608 15,402 12
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood
55,847 13,962
13 Austin-Round Rock 55,826 13,957
14
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario
54,210 13,553 15
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford
52,616 13,154 16
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
52,612 13,153 17
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington
49,614 12,404 18
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
46,691 11,673
19 San Antonio-New Braunfels 42,965 10,741
20
San Diego-Carlsbad
41,324 10,331
POPULATION GROWTH PROJECTIONS
Ranked by Population Growth from 2017 to 2021 Rank MSA Change Annualized
1 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 516,986 129,247 2 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land 436,769 109,192
3 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell 400,924 100,231
4 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale 371,129 92,782
5 New York-Newark-Jersey City 343,380 85,845 6 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim 327,580 81,895 7 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria 312,932 78,233 8 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario 263,744 65,936 9 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach 242,855 60,714 10 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia 218,850 54,713
11 Austin-Round Rock 206,128 51,532
12 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue 198,011 49,503 13 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford 187,646 46,912 14 Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise 186,020 46,505 15 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater 184,677 46,169 16 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward 184,175 46,044
17 San Antonio-New Braunfels 179,122 44,781
18 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 158,409 39,602 19 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington 142,260 35,565 20 San Diego-Carlsbad 142,202 35,551
Potential Future Markets Current Portfolio
12
LIVE WORK PLAY
We look to acquire newer Class A properties with the following features: Proximity to Work high-growth submarkets often within close proximity to high quality employers. Property Amenities club areas for entertaining, resort-style swimming pools, 24-hour gyms and pet friendly environments Neighbourhood Amenities coffee houses, night clubs, entertainment venues and restaurants Outdoor Recreation biking, hiking, running, parks, golf courses and nature preserves
Three photos above: PURE Farmers Market, Dallas, TX
13
PURE Creekside at Onion Creek, Austin, TX
14
1 As at September 30, 2017 and includes PURE Farmers Market purchased on October 2, 2017. 2 As at September 30, 2017.
Park 28, Phoenix, AZ Park 28, Phoenix, AZ
15
Sources:
1
Article: Putting America’s ridiculously large $18T economy into perspective by comparing US state GDPs to entire countries Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis ; International Monetary Fund:; http://www.aei.org/publication/putting-americas-ridiculously-large-18t-economy-into-perspective-by-comparing-us-state-gdps-to-entire-countries/.
2
The Texas Way of Urbanism (Report)– center for opportunity urbanism - http://opportunityurbanism.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/TheTexasWayOfUrbanismReport-6.pdf.
3
http://www.huliq.com/14166/texas-triangle-economic-engine-southwest
TEXAS TRIANGLE FACTS: Texas’ GDP exceeds Canada's national GDP:
- State of Texas (2015): $1.59 trillion 1
- Canada (2015): $1.55 trillion 1
The Texas Triangle represents 2:
- 77% of Texas GDP ($1.22 trillion)
- 18 Million residents (equal to half the
population of Canada)
- 53 “Fortune 500” company headquarters
Texas
Dallas Houston San Antonio Austin
These four Texas Triangle cities come together to form a great economic engine that serves Texas, and much of the southwestern United States 3
16
Legacy & Legacy West Home to newly relocated corporate headquarters: JP Morgan, FedEx, Toyota & Liberty Mutual
Pure Management Head Office PM
Downtown Dallas Las Colinas DFW Airport Telecom Corridor A B C D
Property Units Buildings Acres Amalfi 395 2 5.8 Avenue 368 1 3.7 Bear Creek 436 25 28.0 Fountainwood 288 20 13.6 Hackberry Creek 560 29 24.6 La Villita 306 15 11.9 Lansbrook 288 10 18.6 Prairie Creek 464 45 38.6 Preserve 330 13 15.3 PURE Farmers Market 340 3 7.1 Valley Ranch 210 14 11.2 Totals 3,985 177 178.3
8 9 10 5 6 7 2 3 4 1 11
* As at September 30, 2017 and includes PURE Farmers Market purchased on October 2, 2017.
4 3 5 6 11 2 9 1 7
PM
A D C B 10 8
17
1 As at September 30, 2017 and includes PURE Farmers Market purchased on October 2, 2017. 2 As at September 30, 2017. 3 As at December 31, 2014. 4 For the year ended December 31, 2014. 5 For the 3 months ending September 30, 2017.
SINCE 2014: Pure Multi-Family has sold 6 properties consisting of 1,398 suites with an average age of 1987 for $135 million. Achieved an average annual ROE of 25% on dispositions. Strategically re-deployed capital into new assets and improved the quality of the portfolio with properties that feature more attractive rental growth prospects.
Avenue on Fairmount, Dallas, TX
Total Portfolio Value (FMV) 2017 1: ~$1.08 Billion Capital Recycling Since 2014 2: $135 Million LTV 2014 3: 57.9% LTV 2017 1: 52.3%
- Avg. Age 2014 3:
1995
- Avg. Age 2017 1:
2007
- Avg. Rent 2014 4:
$958
- Avg. Rent 2017 5:
$1,249
18
Acquired: October 2, 2017 Purchase Price: USD $66.35 Million Units: 340 Rentable Area: 280,223 SF Buildings: 3 Site Area: 7.1 Acres Mortgage: USD $33.5 Million Interest Rate: 3.67% Fixed Maturity: 2029
19
Avenue on Fairmount, Dallas, TX
20
1 As at November 22, 2017. 2 Adjustments made for the June equity offering, non-recurring G&A and duplication of management fees. 3 As per Q3 2017 financial results (does not include the acquisition of PURE Farmers Market).
PURE Farmers Market, Dallas, TX
Unit Price 1 $6.29 USD (RUF.U) $7.95 CAD (RUF.UN) Consensus Target Price - USD $6.96 Consensus NAV - USD $6.78
- Adj. AFFO Payout 2
115% Class A Units Outstanding 76.7 million Annual Distribution USD$ Per Unit $0.375 Distribution Yield 6.0% (USD$ Millions) Market Capitalization 1 USD $482.6 Cash 3 $92.4 Debt 3 $566.8 Gross Book Value (GBV) 3 $1,115.6 Debt to GBV 3 50.8% Enterprise Value 1 $1,038.7
21 Asset management and property management functions internalized for no external fee to unitholders. All properties transitioned to new platform in Q3 2017. No third-party property management fees payable in Q4 2017. Vertically integrated property management platform now
- perational and scalable for future
growth.
PURE Creekside at Onion Creek, Austin, TX
22 Pure Multi-Family has strategically deleveraged its balance sheet since inception. Debt to Gross Book Value is 50.8% as at September 30, 2017.
* As at September 30, 2017. Source: Pure Multi-Family REIT LP Financial Results
Debt to Gross Book Value
23
0.2% 0.8% 12.1% 1.3% 8.1% 6.9% 5.9% 11.5% 1.3% 1.4% 50.5% 3.29% 3.26% 3.38% 4.32% 3.71% 3.84%
0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50% 4.00% 4.50% 5.00% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 Thereafter Interest Rate Principal Maturities Scheduled Principal Repayments Weighted Average Rate - Expiry
Mortgage Maturities Mortgage Maturities1: 100% fixed rate mortgages. Weighted average term remaining is 9 years. Mortgages maturing after 2020 is 86.9%. Weighted average interest rate is 3.72%.
1 As at September 30, 2017.
Debt to Gross Book Value is 50.8%.
24
1 Existing Market include Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, San Antonio, Austin and Phoenix
Source: CoStar
Net absorption is forecasted to be in line with deliveries.
25
Source: Pure Multi-Family REIT LP Financial Results
The temporary increase to the AFFO payout ratios were primarily due to:
- bought deal equity offerings completed during the current year
- timing of the deployment of the proceeds used for acquisitions
- additional G&A expense incurred due to the internalization
- lowering of the overall leverage
26
1 Data as per Pure Multi-Family quarterly financial results. Same Properties as compared to properties owned as of beginning of the previous year. 2 Source: NBF (Peers include BEI, CAR, IIP, H&R, KMP)
Same Property NOI Growth & Same Property Average Monthly Rent - 2014 to Present 1
4. 4.3% 3% 4. 4.5% 5% 4. 4.1% 1% 4. 4.6% 6% 5. 5.6% 6% 5. 5.7% 7% 6. 6.0% 0% 6. 6.0% 0% 5. 5.5% 5% 5. 5.6% 6% 5. 5.6% 6% 5. 5.4% 4% 4. 4.6% 6% 4. 4.7% 7% 3. 3.4% 4%
- 2.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% Q1 2014 Q2 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017
SP NOI SP Avg. Monthly Rent Growth
RUF Average 7.76% 1 Peer Average 2.22% 2 Q3-17 Same Property Average monthly rent per occupied unit: 3.4%
27
28
PURE at La Villita, Dallas, TX
29
LOOKING AHEAD:
Strong and experienced management team. Steady and growing US economy. US apartment fundamentals continue to be strong as demand keeps pace with new supply. Greater growth potential in the US market vs Canadian market. High-quality apartment portfolio to drive NAV growth. Graduation to TSX anticipated in 2018.
PURE Farmers Market, Dallas, TX
30 Pure Multi-Family REIT LP - Total Returns Since IPO
Source: CIBC Capital Markets, November 2017
RUF.U S&P/TSX REIT S&P/TSX (TSX-V) Total Return Index Total Return Index YTD 6.7% 9.0% 8.0% 1 Year 13.9% 15.5% 9.9% 2 Years 27.6% 24.0% 27.4% 3 Years 57.9% 19.1% 17.2% Since IPO 83.7% 32.9% 64.0% Total Returns
The adjusted Canadian Dollar Equivalent for RUF.U is 128% since IPO
31
Pinnacle at Union Hills, Phoenix, AZ
32
1 Portfolio as at September 30, 2017 and including PURE Farmers Market purchased on October 2, 2017. 2 Average rent per occupied unit represents average in-place rent for all occupied units during the month of September 2017.
Property Location
Acquisition Date
Current Value (USD) 1 Current FMV 1 Cap Rate Year of Construction Nominal Fixed Interest Rates 1 Leased Occupancy % 1 Avg Rent (per unit) 2 Units Rentable Area (sf) Avg Unit Size (sf) # of Buildings Site Size (acres)
Valley Ranch Dallas-Forth Worth, TX 18-Jul-12
$31,993,516 5.25% 1999 3.51% 94.3% $1,313 210 208,136 991 14 11.2
Prairie Creek Dallas-Forth Worth, TX 11-Oct-12
$84,890,732 5.25% 1997 4.07% 97.4% $1,390 464 464,082 1,000 45 38.6
Bear Creek Dallas-Forth Worth, TX 31-Oct-12
$65,996,932 5.25% 2004 3.45% 99.8% $1,252 436 419,325 962 25 28.0
Hackberry Creek Dallas-Forth Worth, TX 6-Jun-13
$66,834,420 5.50% 1984 3.90% 97.3% $1,041 560 435,208 777 29 24.6
Fountainwood Dallas-Forth Worth, TX 30-Aug-13
$29,105,197 6.00% 1986 4.46% 97.6% $982 288 228,900 795 20 13.6
Preserve Dallas-Forth Worth, TX 28-Aug-14
$53,091,352 5.25% 1998 3.26% 96.4% $1,243 330 310,072 940 13 15.3
Amalfi Dallas-Forth Worth, TX 10-Aug-15
$69,200,000 4.75% 2014 3.83% 95.2% $1,233 395 320,163 811 2 5.8
Avenue Dallas-Forth Worth, TX 14-Sep-16
$69,500,000 4.75% 2015 3.40% 97.6% $1,487 368 304,950 829 1 3.7
Lansbrook Dallas-Forth Worth, TX 27-Jan-17
$40,297,632 5.25% 2002 3.27% 98.3% $1,122 288 276,708 961 10 18.6
La Villita Dallas-Forth Worth, TX 11-Jul-17
$48,883,417 5.00% 2007 3.81% 90.8% $1,337 306 281,010 918 15 11.9
Pure Farmers Market Dallas-Forth Worth, TX 2-Oct-17
$66,350,000 5.00% 2016 3.67% N/A N/A 340 280,223 824 3 7.1
Totals & Weighted Averages
$626,143,198 5.15% 2005 3.69% 96.7% $1,237 3,985 3,528,777 886 177 178.3
Deer Park Houston, TX 21-Jun-13
$27,524,397 5.75% 2000 4.21% 99.1% $1,204 216 201,804 934 10 12.2
Walker Commons Houston, TX 27-Jun-14
$52,978,001 6.00% 2008 3.11% 100.0% $1,228 352 326,590 928 12 18.7
Totals & Weighted Averages
$80,502,398 5.91% 2005 3.50% 99.6% $1,219 568 528,394 930 22 30.9
Park at West Ave San Antonio, TX 7-May-15
$53,038,264 5.00% 2014 4.02% 97.5% $1,246 360 323,255 898 20 29.6
Brackenridge San Antonio, TX 30-Sep-15
$51,110,206 4.85% 2014 3.72% 98.9% $1,456 282 240,205 852 9 9.6
Pure View San Antonio, TX 1-Mar-16
$58,300,000 5.00% 2014 3.92% 97.4% $1,244 416 392,192 943 13 19.4
Pure Estates San Antonio, TX 1-Mar-16
$56,869,612 5.00% 2007 3.96% 95.9% $1,410 344 390,592 1,135 45 34.8
Totals & Weighted Averages
$219,318,082 4.97% 2012 3.91% 97.4% $1,328 1,402 1,346,244 960 87 93.4
San Brisas Phoenix, AZ 28-Aug-14 & 1-Oct-13
$36,700,000 5.25% 1996 3.26% 98.6% $1,174 208 209,284 1,006 26 13.0
Park 28 Phoenix, AZ 9-Jun-17
$29,718,482 5.00% 2015 3.84% 93.4% $1,304 152 125,582 826 2 4.3
Pinnacle at Union Hills Phoenix, AZ 15-Jun-17
$47,518,449 5.25% 1996 3.32% 97.3% $1,196 264 269,128 1,019 16 14.1
Totals & Weighted Averages
$113,936,931 5.18% 2001 3.44% 96.8% $1,215 624 603,994 968 44 31.4
Pure Creekside Austin, TX 25-Jan-17
$40,101,626 5.00% 2016 3.98% 97.5% $1,178 276 228,514 828 10 13.6
Totals & Weighted Averages
$40,101,626 5.00% 2016 3.98% 97.5% $1,178 276 228,514 828 10 13.6 Portfolio Totals & Weighted Averages $1,080,002,235 5.17% 2007 3.71% 97.1% $1,250 6,855 6,235,923 910 340 347.6
33
Source: Scotiabank, November 2017.
Pure Multi-Family has continued to improve the average age of its portfolio by way of divesting older properties and acquiring newer properties. Younger properties generally require less capex per suite, maintenance and repairs, and cosmetic improvements.
34 To date, Pure Multi-Family has had a 100% success rate in reducing the initial assessed property tax value on all properties that have gone through an appeal process. January 2016
Estimates: Management is required to estimate the tax expense for the current year for accounting purposes.
September 2016
Actuals: Property tax statements are received from tax authorities with the actual 2016 assessed property values and tax rates.
November 2016
Appeals: Management, through professional property tax consultant, appeal 2016 assessed property tax values with tax authorities. Appeals are based on a fair and equitable analysis (comparing assessed property values of similar properties in surrounding area). Refund: Once resolution on the appealed property value is achieved with tax authorities (through negotiation or law suit) a refund is received for amounts equal to the overpayment. The appeals process can take anywhere from 2 to 24 months.
Future Months January 2017
Payment: 2016 year-end property taxes must be paid by end of January 2017. Properties still under appeal are required to pay the balance due from the September 2016 property tax statements.
35 Brad Sturges Industrial Alliance Securities Inc. Dean Wilkinson CIBC Frederic Blondeau Echelon Wealth Partners Mario Saric Scotiabank Matt Kornack National Bank Financial Michael Smith RBC Dominion Securities Jenny Ma Canaccord Genuity Jimmy Khing Shan GMP Securities Ken Avalos Raymond James
Park 28, Phoenix, AZ