Yuri Kamyshkov
email: kamyshkov@utk.edu
UT P599 Particle and Cosmology seminar • January 25, 2017 Based on the work in collaboration with B. Kerbikov (ITEP), Y. K., L. Varriano (UT)
1
Yuri Kamyshkov email: kamyshkov@utk.edu 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
UT P599 Particle and Cosmology seminar January 25, 2017 Based on the work in collaboration with B. Kerbikov (ITEP), Y. K., L. Varriano (UT) Yuri Kamyshkov email: kamyshkov@utk.edu 1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-state_quantum_system
email: kamyshkov@utk.edu
UT P599 Particle and Cosmology seminar • January 25, 2017 Based on the work in collaboration with B. Kerbikov (ITEP), Y. K., L. Varriano (UT)
1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-state_quantum_system Examples:
In Particle Physics: - neutral ↔
2
3
when
Hamiltonian is Hermitian matrix unitary Oscillation frequency
4
6
increases frequency Absorption damping Proper
Frequency of the system
7
8
9
10
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2017/01/19/trouble-with-quantum-mechanics/
· = −
This equation includes in general the loss of coherence of oscillating system to environment. Loss of coherence is the reset of the oscillation phase between two components. At this moment oscillating system collapses (with some probability) into one of its pure states and continue motion with this boundary conditions. It is “measurement”
boundary conditions.
11
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindblad_equation
e- m- e+
Measurement of the system (the effect): decay with emission of Michels ;
leading again to the decay of the Here the evolution equation for has resulted into simple form of Lindblad equation
12
13
14
15
(1) (2)
16
It looks like the Lindblad “super-operator” term is coming here from the incoherent elastic scattering of oscillating system on the molecules of environment.
17
… and produces a decoherence effect on oscillation.
Probability
in vacuum
18
()
Will be zero if
Source of decoherence
19
t
measurement
M
In the vacuum the probability coherently grows as ~ [ () ] . Every incoherent elastic collision resets the oscillating system’s phase to zero, but the system continues its motion in the environment contributing (with + sign) to the evolution of until it is being “measured” at some later time. Weinberg’s recommendation is to make number of collisions < 1. That is the reason why current muonium
performed in vacuum or with zero pressure.
Absorption and decay make here negative contribution
20
(overestimate), the probability of elastic collision for the neutron component with gas molecules is ≲ 10 per flight. Elastic x-section for component is not well known but its x-section is not larger than for .
system in the beam, the
since the system after scattering can not be measured.
21