Yuri Kamyshkov email: kamyshkov@utk.edu 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

yuri kamyshkov
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Yuri Kamyshkov email: kamyshkov@utk.edu 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

UT P599 Particle and Cosmology seminar January 25, 2017 Based on the work in collaboration with B. Kerbikov (ITEP), Y. K., L. Varriano (UT) Yuri Kamyshkov email: kamyshkov@utk.edu 1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-state_quantum_system


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Yuri Kamyshkov

email: kamyshkov@utk.edu

UT P599 Particle and Cosmology seminar • January 25, 2017 Based on the work in collaboration with B. Kerbikov (ITEP), Y. K., L. Varriano (UT)

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-state_quantum_system Examples:

  • electron spin precession in mag. filed
  • NMR
  • Chemistry

In Particle Physics: - neutral ↔

  • scillations
  • neutrino flavor oscillations
  • oscillations of →
  • oscillation of → mirror state

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

:

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

In general Hamiltonian with mixing leads to

  • scillations between two components.

E.g. neutron oscillation

when

:

Hamiltonian is Hermitian matrix  unitary Oscillation frequency

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 5

Probability doesn’t depend on E but on .

slide-6
SLIDE 6

There are more general description with density matrix

  • L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics, Course Theoretical Physics v. 3
  • R. P. Feynman, Statistical Mechanics, A Set Of Lectures (Advanced Books Classics)
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_matrix

Mixed state: ′ = 1 0 + 0 1 ; + = 1 |˃ = 1 0 ; |˃ = 0 1

  • = ∗

∗ ∗ ∗ =

  • − density matrix
  • = −

· = −

  • +
  • Liouville–von Neumann equation

for density matrix evolution

  • ( = 0) = 1

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Hamiltonian can be more complex, e.g.

for the oscillating neutron moving through the gas (no mag. field)

  • Real potential diff.

increases frequency Absorption damping Proper

  • scillation

Frequency of the system

we should expect for frequency:

7

=

slide-8
SLIDE 8

For even more general case of the complex potential, decay, and including magnetic field and spin: System of 16 coupled diff. eqs can be handled by Mathematica

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Thi description by Liouville–von Neumann equation is still not complete Direct interaction with environment via incoherent elastic collisions is not included. This will lead to decoherence.

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2017/01/19/trouble-with-quantum-mechanics/

“Most general evolution of probabilities satisfies an equation

  • f a class known as Lindblad equations.”
  • = −

· = −

  • +
  • − Liouville–von Neumann equation
slide-11
SLIDE 11

This equation includes in general the loss of coherence of oscillating system to environment. Loss of coherence is the reset of the oscillation phase between two components. At this moment oscillating system collapses (with some probability) into one of its pure states and continue motion with this boundary conditions. It is “measurement”

  • f the system by the environment; system remains in the oscillating state with reset

boundary conditions.

11

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindblad_equation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Example of decoherence of two-level system in old classical paper

  • m+

e- m- e+

Measurement of the system (the effect): decay with emission of Michels ;

  • r inelastic collision with molecules

leading again to the decay of the Here the evolution equation for has resulted into simple form of Lindblad equation

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

(1)

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

(2)

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

(1) (2)

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

It looks like the Lindblad “super-operator” term is coming here from the incoherent elastic scattering of oscillating system on the molecules of environment.

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

… and produces a decoherence effect on oscillation.

Probability

  • f oscillation

in vacuum

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Scattering Integral in Feinberg & Weinberg evolution equation =

()

  • ()

Will be zero if

  • ne of f’s is zero

Source of decoherence

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Loss of COHERENCE is due to scattering integral

t

measurement

M

P P N =

In the vacuum the probability coherently grows as ~ [ () ] . Every incoherent elastic collision resets the oscillating system’s phase to zero, but the system continues its motion in the environment contributing (with + sign) to the evolution of until it is being “measured” at some later time. Weinberg’s recommendation is to make number of collisions < 1. That is the reason why current muonium

  • scillation search experiments are being

performed in vacuum or with zero pressure.

Absorption and decay make here negative contribution

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Loss of coherence in transformation?

  • In ESS n-nbar experiment with L=200-m vacuum vessel and residual pressure is <10
  • r < 10 , vacuum gas H2 , with total cross section 82 barns for thermal neutrons

(overestimate), the probability of elastic collision for the neutron component with gas molecules is ≲ 10 per flight. Elastic x-section for component is not well known but its x-section is not larger than for .

  • If incoherent elastic scattering will occur to oscillating

system in the beam, the

  • system will be scattered isotropically in s-wave and will be mostly removed from the
  • beam. So it will not contribute to the evolution of matrix through scattering integral,

since the system after scattering can not be measured.

Conclusion: for

  • scillation in gas with residual pressure

< 10 the evolution equation has the form :

  • without scattering integral introducing decoherence.

21