Workshop U Best Practices in Hazard Assessment, Job Safety Analysis - PDF document

Workshop U Best Practices in Hazard Assessment, Job Safety Analysis & Other Valuable Hazard Analysis Tools for Change Management Tuesday, March 21, 2017 3:30 p.m. to 4:45 p.m.

Biographical Information Carmen Shafer, CSP, CHST EHS Manager Thermo Fisher Scientific 401 Mill Creek Rd., Marietta, OH 45750 740-568-5823 Carmen.shafer@thermofisher.com Carmen has over 18 years experience as a safety professional working in Indiana, Ohio, Washington DC, Virginia and Maryland. The majority of Carmen’s experience is as a construction safety professional, and has worked in manufacturing for about 8 years. Carmen worked for 3 years at Constellium Rolled Products in Ravenswood, WV as Senior EHS Specialist and joined Thermo Fisher in 2014. She currently is managing both EHS and Facilities activities at the Thermo Fisher Laboratory Products Division in Marietta, Ohio. Carmen is a graduate of Purdue University with a B.S. in Construction Management and received an M.S. in Occupational Safety and Health Management from Indiana State University. She is active on the ANSI A10 committee and is chair of the ANSI A10.38 standard Basic Elements of an Employers Program to Provide a Safe and Healthful Work Environment . Carmen will be starting Post Graduate work in Safety Sciences with Indiana University of Pennsylvania this summer.

•

De te r mine Sc ope Re c omme nd Se le c t Pr e ve ntative T e c hnique Ac tions E valuate Ide ntify Causal Hazar ds F ac tor s

• • • •

• • • •

Br oad Industr y Nar r ow Sc ope Bo w-T ie HAZOP Spe c ific Sc ope Wha t-I f T a ke 5 F ME A JSA ME PS F T A E CP HI RARC HACCP PRCS Co ntro l Ba nding

I de ntify Ha za rds E va lua te RI sks I mple me nt Co ntro ls Re duc e d Risk

• • • • •

• • • • •

L oc ation: De sc r iption: Ope r ating a F or klift By: CAS Date : 1-28-17 Stoc kr oom What If? Answe r Pr obability Conse que nc e s R e c omme ndation Ope ra to r do e s no t E mplo ye e c o uld Hig h F a ta l I njury Se a t b e lts, tra ining we a r the ir fa ll o ut o f the se a t se a tb e lt? o r b e c rushe d if fo rklift o ve rturns F o rklift o ve rturns? E mplo ye e c o uld Hig h Se ve re o r fa ta l T ra ining , rig ht-size b e injure d, injury, da ma g e to fo rklift, pro duc t a nd pro duc t pro pe rty da ma g e

• • A J O B HAZARD ANALYSIS IS A T EC HNIQ UE T HAT FO C USES O N JO B T ASKS AS A W AY T O IDENT IFY HAZARDS HEY O C C UR . I BEFO RE T T FO C USES O N T HE RELAT IO NSHIP BET W EEN T HE • W O RKER , T ASK , T O O LS , AND HE T HE T HE W O RK ENVIRO NMENT . T

T ask Ste p Hazar ds R e quir e d Safe Pr ac tic e s Sta rt F o rklift E q uipme nt fa ilure I nspe c t e q uipme nt prio r to use Drive to pic k- Strike pe de stria n, o ve rturn fo rklift Go Slo w, L o o k b e fo re mo ving , so und up lo c a tio n ho rn, we a r se a tb e lt Re trie ve L o a d Ove rturn fo rklift, dro p lo a d Do no t o ve rlo a d, do no t turn while lifting , mo ve o nly sta b le lo a ds, fully se a t lo a d o n fo rks T a ke L o a d to Ove rturn lift, strike a pe de stria n, Drive in re ve rse if vie w is o b struc te d, g o De stina tio n dro p lo a d, pro pe rty da ma g e so w, so und ho rn, use mirro rs a t inte rse c tio ns, o nly c a rry sta b le lo a ds Pla c e lo a d in Ove rturn lift, da ma g e to ra c ks, Do no t turn while lifting lo a d. Ve rify ra c ks dro ppe d lo a d c le a ra nc e to a vo id striking ra c k struc ture , ve rify lo a d c a pa c ity o f lift a nd ra c ks

•

• • • • •

Ac c e ptable ? Ac tivity Hazar d Cate gor y E xisting Impac ts Pr obability F r e que nc y Se ve r ity R isk or T ask Contr ols / Risks Strike Drive So und Pe de st Sa fe ty I njury 7 10 40 2800 No F o rklift ho rn ria n Drive Strike Physic a l F o rklift Pe de st Sa fe ty I njury 2 7 40 560 Ye s Ba rrie r ria n Ca rry Drive lo a d lo w T ip F o rklift Sa fe ty a nd slo w, T ip Ove r 1 7 7 49 Ye s Ove r we a r se a tb e lt

• • • • •

ro m www.e hsdb .c o m F

• • • •

• • • • • •

• •

Ha za rd Ana lysis Critic a l Re c o rd Co ntro l K e e ping Po ints HACCP Me a ns to E nsure Critic a l Syste m L imits Wo rks Co rre c tive Mo nito ring Ac tio ns

• • • •

He alth Hazar d E xposur e Pote ntial Spe c ify Ha za rd Ba nd 1.* I nha la tio n Ge ne r ic Risk Asse ssme nt Dustine ss o r vo la tility 2.* I ng e stio n * Pa rtic le Size Contr ol Appr oac h 3.* Ab so rptio n Co mb ina tio n o f * T o xic ity 4.* Co nta c t ha za rd a sse ssme nt a nd e xpo sure T ype o f a ppro a c h 5.* Ca rc ino g e n, e tc . po te ntia l re q uire d fo r a de q ua te c o ntro l 1) Ge n Ve ntila tio n fo r lo w ha za rds 2) L E V o r limite d e ng ine e ring c o ntro ls 3) E ng ine e ring c o ntro ls fo r mo de ra te ha za rds 4) Spe c ia list a dvic e re q uire d

• • •

E q uipme nt Ope ra ting a Ma lfunc tio n F o rklift ne a r PM Pre -o p Pe de stria ns Ope ra to r E rro r T ra ining E va lua tio n Ope ra to r F o rklift Se ve re Do e s no t Strike s I njury o r De te c tio n se e Pe d E me rg e nc y Mirro rs Hi Vis F a ta lity Pe de stria n De vic e s Re spo nse Pe de stria n in Pa th De sig na te d Ba rrie r Aisle Pe de stria n Do e s no t Mirro rs se e F o rklift Ho rn L OS

• • • • •

• • •

•

• • • • •

• •

• • • • • •