Workshop U Best Practices in Hazard Assessment, Job Safety Analysis - - PDF document

Workshop U

Best Practices in Hazard Assessment, Job Safety Analysis & Other Valuable Hazard Analysis Tools for Change Management

Tuesday, March 21, 2017 3:30 p.m. to 4:45 p.m.

Biographical Information Carmen Shafer, CSP, CHST EHS Manager Thermo Fisher Scientific 401 Mill Creek Rd., Marietta, OH 45750 740-568-5823 Carmen.shafer@thermofisher.com

Carmen has over 18 years experience as a safety professional working in Indiana, Ohio, Washington DC, Virginia and Maryland. The majority of Carmen’s experience is as a construction safety professional, and has worked in manufacturing for about 8 years. Carmen worked for 3 years at Constellium Rolled Products in Ravenswood, WV as Senior EHS Specialist and joined Thermo Fisher in 2014. She currently is managing both EHS and Facilities activities at the Thermo Fisher Laboratory Products Division in Marietta, Ohio. Carmen is a graduate of Purdue University with a B.S. in Construction Management and received an M.S. in Occupational Safety and Health Management from Indiana State University. She is active on the ANSI A10 committee and is chair of the ANSI A10.38 standard Basic Elements of an Employers Program to Provide a Safe and Healthful Work Environment. Carmen will be starting Post Graduate work in Safety Sciences with Indiana University of Pennsylvania this summer.

De te r mine Sc ope Se le c t T e c hnique Ide ntify Hazar ds E valuate Causal F ac tor s Re c omme nd Pr e ve ntative Ac tions

Wha t-I f JSA HI RARC

Br

• ad

Sc ope

HAZOP F ME A F T A HACCP Co ntro l Ba nding

Industr y Spe c ific

Bo w-T ie T a ke 5 ME PS E CP PRCS

Nar r

• w

Sc ope

Re duc e d Risk

I mple me nt Co ntro ls

E va lua te RI sks I de ntify Ha za rds

L

• c ation:

Stoc kr

• om

De sc r iption: Ope r ating a F

• r

klift By: CAS Date : 1-28-17 What If? Answe r Pr

• bability

Conse que nc e s R e c omme ndation

Ope ra to r do e s no t we a r the ir se a tb e lt? E mplo ye e c o uld fa ll o ut o f the se a t

• r b e c rushe d if

fo rklift o ve rturns Hig h F a ta l I njury Se a t b e lts, tra ining F

• rklift o ve rturns?

E mplo ye e c o uld b e injure d, pro duc t a nd pro pe rty da ma g e Hig h Se ve re o r fa ta l injury, da ma g e to pro duc t T ra ining , rig ht-size fo rklift,

• A JO B HAZARD ANALYSIS IS A

T EC HNIQ UE T HAT FO C USES O N JO B T ASKS AS A W AY T O IDENT IFY HAZARDS BEFO RE T HEY O C C UR. I T FO C USES O N T HE RELAT IO NSHIP BET W EEN T HE W O RKER, T HE T ASK, T HE T O O LS, AND T HE W O RK ENVIRO NMENT.

T ask Ste p Hazar ds R e quir e d Safe Pr ac tic e s

Sta rt F

• rklift

E q uipme nt fa ilure I nspe c t e q uipme nt prio r to use Drive to pic k- up lo c a tio n Strike pe de stria n, o ve rturn fo rklift Go Slo w, L

• o k b e fo re mo ving , so und

ho rn, we a r se a tb e lt Re trie ve L

• a d

Ove rturn fo rklift, dro p lo a d Do no t o ve rlo a d, do no t turn while lifting , mo ve o nly sta b le lo a ds, fully se a t lo a d o n fo rks T a ke L

• a d to

De stina tio n Ove rturn lift, strike a pe de stria n, dro p lo a d, pro pe rty da ma g e Drive in re ve rse if vie w is o b struc te d, g o so w, so und ho rn, use mirro rs a t inte rse c tio ns, o nly c a rry sta b le lo a ds Pla c e lo a d in ra c ks Ove rturn lift, da ma g e to ra c ks, dro ppe d lo a d Do no t turn while lifting lo a d. Ve rify c le a ra nc e to a vo id striking ra c k struc ture , ve rify lo a d c a pa c ity o f lift a nd ra c ks

Ac tivity

• r

T ask Hazar d

Cate gor y

E xisting Contr

• ls

Impac ts / Risks

Pr

• bability

F r e que nc y

Se ve r ity R isk

Ac c e ptable ?

Drive F

• rklift

Strike Pe de st ria n Sa fe ty So und ho rn I njury 7 10 40 2800 No Drive F

• rklift

Strike Pe de st ria n Sa fe ty Physic a l Ba rrie r I njury 2 7 40 560 Ye s Drive F

• rklift

T ip Ove r Sa fe ty Ca rry lo a d lo w a nd slo w, we a r se a tb e lt T ip Ove r 1 7 7 49 Ye s

F ro m www.e hsdb .c o m

HACCP

Ha za rd Ana lysis Critic a l Co ntro l Po ints Critic a l L imits Mo nito ring Co rre c tive Ac tio ns Me a ns to E nsure Syste m Wo rks Re c o rd K e e ping

He alth Hazar d

Spe c ify Ha za rd Ba nd 1.* I nha la tio n 2.* I ng e stio n 3.* Ab so rptio n 4.* Co nta c t 5.* Ca rc ino g e n, e tc .

E xposur e Pote ntial

Dustine ss o r vo la tility * Pa rtic le Size * T

• xic ity

Ge ne r ic Risk Asse ssme nt

Co mb ina tio n o f ha za rd a sse ssme nt a nd e xpo sure po te ntia l

Contr

• l Appr
• ac h

T ype o f a ppro a c h re q uire d fo r a de q ua te c o ntro l 1) Ge n Ve ntila tio n fo r lo w ha za rds 2) L E V o r limite d e ng ine e ring c o ntro ls 3) E ng ine e ring c o ntro ls fo r mo de ra te ha za rds 4) Spe c ia list a dvic e re q uire d

F

• rklift

Strike s Pe de stria n Ope ra ting a F

• rklift ne a r

Pe de stria ns E q uipme nt Ma lfunc tio n Ope ra to r E rro r Ope ra to r Do e s no t se e Pe d Pe de stria n in Pa th Pe de stria n Do e s no t se e F

• rklift

Se ve re I njury o r F a ta lity Pre -o p PM T ra ining Ba rrie r Mirro rs Hi Vis De sig na te d Aisle De te c tio n De vic e s Mirro rs Ho rn L OS E me rg e nc y Re spo nse E va lua tio n