workshop on skin conditions and new technologies in wound
play

WORKSHOP ON SKIN CONDITIONS AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN WOUND CARE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

WORKSHOP ON SKIN CONDITIONS AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN WOUND CARE Vycki Nalls, GNP-BC, CWS, ACPHN Jeanine Maguire, MPT, CWS What is the Triple Aim? J Triple Aim: Best Outcomes, Highest Satisfaction, Lowest Price


  1. WORKSHOP ON SKIN CONDITIONS AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN WOUND CARE Vycki Nalls, GNP-BC, CWS, ACPHN Jeanine Maguire, MPT, CWS

  2. What is the ‘Triple Aim’? J ■ Triple Aim: Best Outcomes, Highest Satisfaction, Lowest Price ■ The shift is NOW occurring from fee-for-service to payment for outcomes ■ Measures: – Quality Measures (specifically: section M for pressure ulcers, function – Claims (rehospitalizations) ■ All Post-acute care providers – IMPACT Law 2014 now in effect ■ But what will impact all Acute Care AND who they will partner with post-acute – Rehospitalizations

  3. Statistics v u PUs affect one in nine U.S. LTC residents and prevalence's of greater than 20% have been reported. Because LTC is the fastest growing segment of the U.S. healthcare continuum, cost-effective PU prevention solutions are urgently needed. u Maryland has a 1.3% average of pressure ulcers for short stay residents with new or worsening wounds, which is the same for the national average. u Maryland Long term care residents who are HIGH RISK have an average of 6.8% pressure ulcers compared to the national average of 5.8%

  4. What are the facts… J ■ Up to 3 million PUs Reported per year in U.S. ■ Cost > 11 BILLION annually in U.S. ■ JAMDA article: > 26% of hospital readmissions have PU ■ > 60,000 deaths/year in U.S. ■ 2 nd most common cause of litigation – many now in the millions ■ Pressure Ulcers= MDS Quality Measures= 5 Star (admissions) ■ F314 can and has closed centers down to admissions ■ Family perception = litigation ■ Cost of a stage 4 $129,000

  5. Pressure Injury Fast Facts V u New Definitions now available from the NPUAP (April 2016) u Definition: localized damage to skin and/or underlying soft tissue over a bony prominence or device u Can be intact skin or open u Results from intense/prolonged pressure and/or in combination with shear u Tissue tolerance - affected by pressure, shear, microclimate, nutrition, perfusion, co- morbidities, condition of the soft tissue u Medical Device Related Pressure Injury - use staging system u Mucosal Membrane Pressure Injury - do not use staging system

  6. NPUAP Pressure Injury Stages (updated April 2016) (J) Full Intact skin, non-blanchable erythema; changes in sensation, temp, or firmness may Stage I I precede visual changes; does not include purple/maroon areas Partial-thickness loss; wound bed pink/red, moist; intact or ruptured serum-filled Stage I II blister; NO granulation tissue, slough of eschar; does not include MASD, IAD, ITD, MARSI, skin tears, burns abrasions Full-thickness loss; adipose tissue visible, depth depends on anatomical location; may Stage I III have undermining/tunneling; no fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, and/or bone exposed Full-thickness loss, exposed OR directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, Stage I IV cartilage, bone; may have undermining/tunneling, epibole, slough/eschar Full-thickness where extent of tissue damage cannot be determined d/t Unstag ageab able slough/eschar; NOTE: Stable eschar on an ischemic limb or heel should NOT be removed Intact/non-intact localized area of non-blanchable deep red/maroon/purple; Deep T p Tissue I e Injury epidermal separation revealing a dark wound bed or blood-filled blister. May evolve to (DT DTI) open wound or may resolve without tissue loss http://www.npuap ap.or org/resources/educational al-and-cli linical al-reso sources/npuap-pressu sure-injury-stag ages /

  7. Balancing: Clinical, Regulatory, (J) Business, Legal risks, practice acts ■ Difficult to balance al all as aspec ects that impact care for prevention and treatment of wounds 1. 1. Clinic ical al perspective with standards of care and best practices – requires intense wound prevention and care education, knowledge and well- developed skills 2. 2. Regulat ator ory perspective with reporting and survey processes 3. 3. Busi siness ss perspective – ensuring business has enough money to pay salaries, provide care with supplies and equipment, make profit to make it worth while to owners to keep buildings open 4. 4. Legal r ris isks – lawyers, OIG 5. 5. Practic tice a acts ts –some nursing professionals push their practice acts in LTC- LPN

  8. 6 steps Providers can take to improve outcomes j 1. Ensure Dx is correct 2. Question findings 3. Direct in Root Cause 4. Determine ‘wound’ prognosis 5. Collaborate with the inter-professional team 6. Communicate and lead

  9. Ensure the wound type, or Dx, is correct j ■ Wounds are frequently mislabeled as ‘pressure’ – Moisture Associated Skin Damage – Neuropathic Ulcers ■ Question the causative findings ■ Was the patient examined in sitting, side lying, supine and with their devices in place (splints, etc…) ■ Was the cause pressure and related to positioning?

  10. HEA HEAL A ABIL ILITY J Add th the “ “heala lability” con oncept t into o you our com ompr prehensive pa pati tient a t and wou ound a assessments ts

  11. Determine patient wound prognosis j ■ Determine outcome and document rational ■ AMA – Good for healing (Medicare expects evidence of healing every 1-2 weeks) – Anticipate a delay (based on what findings) – Palliative, healing not expected, in some cases further decline may be anticipated (based on what findings)

  12. Clinicians should be able to distinguish: v Healable Have adequate blood supply • Can heal if underlying causes addressed Maintenance • Healing potential • Patient / resident or health system barriers compromising healing • Patient/ residents may be nonadherent to treatment; resource limitations Nonhealable • Includes palliative wounds • Cannot heal due to irreversible causes/ illnesses • Critical ischemia; non treatable malignancy

  13. Practice Pearls-Sibbald 2015 v ■ All chronic wounds should be classified as hea heala lable, e, no nonh nhealable, or ma maint ntena nanc nce ■ Moisture-balance dressings important for healable wounds ■ Moisture reduction often more appropriate for nonhealable or maintenance wounds ■ Sharp surgical debridement is appropriate for healable wounds, with conservative surgical debridement of slough more important for the nonhealable and maintenance wound.

  14. Homeostasis v u Principles of physiological homeostasis u Physical equilibrium u corrective mechanism u constancy maintained in the face of continuous change u Active risk factors and comorbidities make it harder for the body to maintain balance

  15. Factors that Impact Wound Healing v u Tissue perfusion/Central circulatory function – do they have adequate blood flow? u Adequate oxygenation? BPs stable? Orthostatics? u Nutritional Status – ASPEN guidelines u Chronic illnesses - DM, renal disease, malignancy, impaired digestion, neurological disorders u Inflammatory/Autoimmune disorders/Immunosuppresion u Coagulation disorders (including medication induced) u Age

  16. Root Cause: Process Symptom? J ■ Ask the center DON- any other in-house acquired pressure ulcers this week? This unit? ■ Should a root cause analysis be done? ■ Guide AWAY from ‘knee-jerk’ quick fix solutions ■ Guide to sustainable process improvement that involve the team

  17. Root Cause: Patient Symptom j ■ What tipped the scale of homeostasis? ■ Review co-morbid conditions ■ Review medications ■ Discuss any changes ■ Evaluate blood flow ■ Detail your findings with the inter-professional team and within documentation

  18. Collaborate with Inter-Professional Team j ■ Refer to nursing for appropriate formulary Guideline for wound treatments and bed surfaces ■ Refer to therapy for sharps, modalities to promote healing, mobility, contracture management ■ Refer to Dietitian for evaluation and recommendations ■ Is Vascular Consult required? ■ ABI? ■ Concerns with Osteo? Infection? ■ What are Advanced Directives? What will tests mean for care options?

  19. Case study - What do you think? V ■ Long term care resident ■ PMH: COPD, CHF, HTN, morbid obesity, mechanical lift to wheelchair, mild cognitive impairment, incontinent of bladder/bowel ■ Stage IV wound present for over a year ■ Went to plastic surgeon, who attempted to close wound surgically ■ Returned to the facility with a wound vac, new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (and now on anticoagulants), and BPs running 90s/50s. ■ Healable?

  20. Communication… Live well, die well (Advanced Directives, Communication GL, leading the team) J V ■ The tx’s are less important than the medical management and homeostasis. ■ Hydrogel vs. hydrocolloid means very little to outcomes if the patient has been mis-dx’d and is not able to heal ■ Practice medicine/evaluate co-morbidities/meds… lead the team in understanding homeostasis, dx, prognosis…

  21. What does exercise and strengthening have to do with wound healing? J ■ Increases circulation ■ Decreases pressure ■ Is a wound a musculoskeletal injury?

  22. Anticipating a delay in healing? How to add some influence… J ■ Low Frequency Ultrasound (US Mist) – FDA approved to promotes wound healing – Decreases Bioburden & Biofilm ■ Electrical Stimulation – Medicare approved, increases neoangiogensis – Reduces edema – Decreases pain – Promotes healing

  23. Impact your Outcomes…. J ■ Electromagnetic Therapy – Increases circulation – Decreases pain ■ Pulsed Lavage – Mechanically Debrides – Decreases Bioburden & Biofilm

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend