Workshop Day 1: Issues and Opportunities The Arroyo Group Planning, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

workshop day 1 issues and opportunities
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Workshop Day 1: Issues and Opportunities The Arroyo Group Planning, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Inglewood Transit-Oriented Development Plans Downtown Inglewood Fairview Heights Westchester/Veterans Crenshaw/Imperial Crenshaw/Imperial Workshop Day 1: Issues and Opportunities The Arroyo Group Planning, Urban Design and Community


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Inglewood Transit-Oriented Development Plans

Downtown Inglewood ▪ Fairview Heights ▪ Westchester/Veterans ▪ Crenshaw/Imperial

Crenshaw/Imperial

Workshop Day 1: Issues and Opportunities

The Arroyo Group Planning, Urban Design and Community Engagement Stanley R. Hoffman Associates Economics and Market Iteris Mobility and Parking JMC2 Civil Engineering Productivity Consulting Social Media and Facilitation Metis Environmental Group CEQA

January 10, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Inglewood Transit-Oriented Development Plans

Downtown Inglewood ▪ Fairview Heights ▪ Westchester/Veterans ▪ Crenshaw/Imperial

Citywide and Regional Factors

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Inglewood Transit-Oriented Development Plans

Downtown Inglewood ▪ Fairview Heights ▪ Westchester/Veterans ▪ Crenshaw/Imperial

Market Study

Crenshaw/Imperial

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Identify Sources of Demand

– Local Population/Households – Local Employment/Businesses – Regional Serving Employment/Drive-by traffic – Hawthorne Airport and SpaceX – Users of Light Rail System

  • Feasibility of Prototype Land Uses

– Multi-Family Apartments – Owner-Occupied Townhomes/Condominiums – Mixed-Use Residential/Retail – Hospitality/Lodging

Purpose of Market Study

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Market Area

Planning and Market Areas

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Land Use

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Dominant Non-residential Land Uses are Commercial and Industrial

Existing Land Uses

Planning Area and Ring – Outside City

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Retail, 77% Office, 23% Retail, 64% Office, 11% Industrial, 25%

Source: CoStar Group, 2016

Planning Area Non-residential Land Use Distribution Market Area Non-residential Land Use Distribution

Non-Residential Land Use Distribution

Planning Area and Market Area

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Source: Los Angeles County, Office of the Assessor

In Planning Area: Limited Under-utilized land - (6.4 acres) Limited Vacant Land - (0.6 acres)

0.6 6.4 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 Planning Area Under- utilized

7.0 Acres

Estimated Vacant and Under-Utilized Land

Planning Area

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Vacant Land Under-utilized Land Under-utilized Land

Vacant and Under-Utilized Land

Planning Area

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Non-residential Property Statistics

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Source: CoStar Group, 2016

Planning Area Non-residential 12-Month Absorption Market Area Non-residential 12-Month Absorption

7,321

  • 2,082
  • 5,000

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Retail

Planning Area: Low Retail and Office Absorption

Office 18,948

  • 1,762
  • 5,000

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Retail Office

Market Area: Low Retail and Office Absorption

12 Month Absorption (sf) – 5-Year Avg.

Planning Area and Market Area

slide-21
SLIDE 21

2.2% 17.9% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% 20.0% Retail Office 1.3% 13.0% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% 20.0% Retail Office

Market Area: Low Retail Vacancy and High Office Vacancy

Source: CoStar Group, 2016

Planning Area Non-residential Property Vacancy Rates Market Area Non-residential Property Vacancy Rates Planning Area: Low Retail Vacancy and High Office Vacancy

Vacancy Rates

Planning Area and Market Area

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Employment

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Office 39% Retail 31% Industrial 1% Arts, Entertainment and Recreation 0% Restaurants and Lodging 14% Education and Health 12% Other 3% Total Jobs = 1,635

Source: LEHD

Professional/Technical, Retail, and Restaurant and Lodging Sectors constitute over 80% of Total Jobs

Employment Distribution - 2014

Planning Area

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Change in Total Employment Change in Employment by Sector

1,079 919 1,635 1,142 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 Planning Area Ring Outside City 20 10 20 14 219 164 10

  • 2

117 83 43 117

  • 57
  • 21

7 129

  • 100
  • 50

50 100 150 200 250 300 Planning Area Ring Outside City

Source: LEHD

Planning Area employment grew by about 560 from 2010 - 2014

Planning Area: About 90 % of employment growth in Professional/Technical, Retail, Restaurants & Lodging sectors

Historical Employment – 2010 to 2014

Planning Area and Ring Outside City

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Demographics

slide-26
SLIDE 26

1,977 1,562 615 529 1,635 1,142 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Planning Area Ring - Outside City Population Households Employment

Source: Esri, 2016

Planning Area: Jobs per Household = 2.66 Ring – Outside City: Jobs per Household = 2.16

Population, Households, Employment

Planning Area and Ring Outside City

slide-27
SLIDE 27

$50,061 $39,944 $42,264 $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 Planning Area Ring - Outside City City of Inglewood

Source: Esri, 2016

Planning Area: Median income in Planning Area ($50,061) – higher than Ring ($39,944) and City medians ($42,264)

Median Household Income

Planning Area, Ring Outside City, Inglewood

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Development Constraints and Opportunities

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • Limited vacant and under-utilized land supply
  • Extensive strip commercial with narrow lot depths along Imperial Highway
  • Light rail transit (LRT) station about ½ mile from center of Planning Area; not conducive

for adjacent TOD development

  • Difficult access for pedestrians to LRT station in middle of I-105 Freeway; must cross on-

and off-ramps

  • Competitive retail center just south of I-105 in Hawthorne, i.e., Target/Lowes center
  • Future competitive retail/entertainment center at Hollywood Park
  • Level of crime noted in interviews as an issue
  • Low, non-residential growth forecasts for largely, built-out area

Development Constraints

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • Availability of transit station in middle of I-105
  • With improved connectivity, LRT driven demand for higher density owner and

rental housing

  • At crossroads of two major arterials: Imperial Hwy and Crenshaw
  • Mixed-use residential potential within larger, retail centers
  • Private sector driven revitalization of retail centers taking place
  • Existing higher-density apartments along eastern Imperial Highway
  • Well located commercial and services business serving local households and

drive-by traffic

  • Development of Hollywood Park and NFL stadium will generate higher level of

drive-by traffic

Development Opportunities

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Inglewood Transit-Oriented Development Plans

Downtown Inglewood ▪ Fairview Heights ▪ Westchester/Veterans ▪ Crenshaw/Imperial

Mobility and Parking

Westchester/Veterans and Crenshaw/Imperial

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Existing Conditions

32

Intersection Level of Service (LOS) is a measure of traffic

  • perating conditions in the project area
  • 16 intersections analyzed for peak hour traffic conditions
  • 12 intersections operate at satisfactory LOS (A-D)
  • Following 4 intersections operate at LOS E or worse:
  • Aviation Blvd/Manchester Blvd (a.m. peak hour)
  • Aviation Blvd/Arbor Vitae St (a.m. peak hour)
  • La Cienega Blvd/Florence Ave (p.m. peak hour)
  • Prairie Ave/Imperial Hwy (a.m. peak hour)
slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Westchester/Veterans Imperial/Crenshaw

Collisions (2015-16)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Imperial/Crenshaw Potential Complete Streets

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

  • Florence Ave
  • Manchester Blvd
  • Arbor Vitae St
  • La Brea Ave
  • Prairie Ave
  • Imperial Hwy
  • Century Blvd
  • Crenshaw Blvd
  • Market St

Potential Linkage Routes

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Inglewood Transit-Oriented Development Plans

Downtown Inglewood ▪ Fairview Heights ▪ Westchester/Veterans ▪ Crenshaw/Imperial

Infrastructure

Crenshaw/Imperial

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • This project area is fully developed with residential and commercial

properties and a public school. The available infrastructure (utilities and roads) have little or no constraints but there are some utilities that may need upgrades or line extensions regarding future redevelopment and property usage plans.

  • Potential utility line limitations:

– Fiber Optics – available along Imperial Hwy, South Van Ness, and S. Cherry St.

  • nly

– Water – 6” lines may need to be upsized for fire water safety demands – Sewer – Asbestos Cement pipes may need replacement to environmentally friendlier pipes – Electrical/Cable/Phone – Aboveground lines should eventually go underground

Infrastructure: Crenshaw/Imperial

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Inglewood Transit-Oriented Development Plans

Downtown Inglewood ▪ Fairview Heights ▪ Westchester/Veterans ▪ Crenshaw/Imperial

Potentials for Public Realm and Land Use Districts

Crenshaw/Imperial

slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40
slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44
slide-45
SLIDE 45

Inglewood Transit-Oriented Development Plans

Downtown Inglewood ▪ Fairview Heights ▪ Westchester/Veterans ▪ Crenshaw/Imperial

Westchester/Veterans and Crenshaw/Imperial

Workshop Day 1: Issues and Opportunities

The Arroyo Group Planning, Urban Design and Community Engagement Stanley R. Hoffman Associates Economics and Market Iteris Mobility and Parking JMC2 Civil Engineering Productivity Consulting Social Media and Facilitation Metis Environmental Group CEQA

January 10, 2017