SLIDE 1
Day 1 Day 1 Staging area Buses & Ambulances In Use Day 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Day 1 Day 1 Staging area Buses & Ambulances In Use Day 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Day 1 Day 1 Staging area Buses & Ambulances In Use Day 1 Day 2 Days 2 & 3 Day 4 Day 4 Cumulative results (as of 211900ZAUG2016) Rescued 511 passengers and crew; 5 dogs. Mobilized 20+ federal, commonwealth, local, and
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
Day 1
SLIDE 4
Day 1
SLIDE 5
Staging area Buses & Ambulances In Use
SLIDE 6
Day 1 Day 2
SLIDE 7
Days 2 & 3
SLIDE 8
Day 4
SLIDE 9
Day 4
SLIDE 10
Cumulative results (as of 211900ZAUG2016)
Rescued 511 passengers and crew; 5 dogs. Mobilized 20+ federal, commonwealth, local, and industry partners for coordinated ICS response to ensure safety and minimize environmental impacts. Coordinated salvage effort to refloat, ensure the stability of, and safely conduct dead ship tow of 614-ft, 28,000 ton vessel, followed by the extinguishing and
- verhaul of the engine room fire.
SLIDE 11
Quick MR O activation & partnering saved 511 lives
+ R
apid implementation of IC S / establishment of IC P
+ Timely R
F F / Activation of C G DS F and S ME ’s
+ E
xercising MR O more frequently than requirements
+ Maintaining a P
axVsl S pecialist at certain S ectors w/ HC P Vs
+ Immediate MTS
R U T eam/C AR T population provided transparency and helped address questions before additional work was generated.
SLIDE 12
Δ Insufficient Interagency communication procedures and capabilities Δ Additional MRO plan familiarity needed Δ Maintaining ICS structure until threat of potential pollution was successfully mitigated Δ Don’t underestimate social media
SLIDE 13
SLIDE 14
SLIDE 15
Successes +Timely R
F F /Activation of DS F & S ME ’s: S trike T eam, IMA T , S E R T engineers, Doc support.
+ E
S D support was rapid and efficient
+ E
xcellent engagement from trustees
Challenges Δ P
ersonnel: Need more qualified IC S personnel & lacked pre-designated bilingual agency reps
Δ F
acilities: Insufficient space for Incident C
- mmand P
- st & J
- int Information C
enter
Δ Processes/procedures: proficiency w/
Incident Management S
- ftware S
ystem
SLIDE 16
SLIDE 17
SLIDE 18
SLIDE 19
SLIDE 20
SLIDE 21
SLIDE 22
SLIDE 23
SLIDE 24
S uccesses
+ R apid initial notifications and MR O Plan activation and AC P
+ Immediate S
ector wide response -initial phases and IC P S tand-up
+ Immediate designation of on-scene
commander
C hallenges
Δ Limited initial situational awareness and
communication on-scene
Δ Management of the amount of
information flowing into the C C
Δ Language Barriers and need for S
panish speakers in the S C C and Pier 6
SLIDE 25
S uccesses
+ Quantities, diverse capabilities, and
response times of assets were critical to success
C hallenges
Δ Insufficient Interagency communication
procedures and capabilities
Δ On-scene air control/air boss not initially
designated
Δ E
stablish T emp F light R estrictions earlier
Δ Difficulty accounting for numbers on the
- ship. Verification of clear ship.
SLIDE 26
S uccesses
+ Landing site and R
eception C enter designated in MR O plan were validated
+ C
- ast Guard representation at on-scene
mobile command post and landing site was critical
C hallenges
Δ Accountability was difficult to perform Δ C
- mmsbetween Landing S
ite & C
- mC
en were difficult to establish due to lack of communication equipment
Δ Need to identify/train personnel for
Advance T eam to landing site
SLIDE 27
Successes
+ 24/7 “E yes on” achieved via F R C
+ Use of cutter small boat was optimal + C
- mmscheck-ins w/ salvage assets
Challenges Δ Provide upfront expectations for S
afety
Z
- ne enforcement. UoFexpectations, etc.
Δ Identify type and make of vessels making up
the salvage crew and provide a list to S afety Z
- ne
assets
Δ C
- nfusion differentiating crewmembers of