Kings Staging Ammar Al-Chalabi ENCALS Training for TRICALS Milan, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

king s staging
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Kings Staging Ammar Al-Chalabi ENCALS Training for TRICALS Milan, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Kings Staging Ammar Al-Chalabi ENCALS Training for TRICALS Milan, 21-22 May 2016 ammar.al-chalabi@kcl.ac.uk Staging systems ALS staging systems proposed Rehabilitation based scale Sinaki M, Mayo Clin Proc 1978 ALS


slide-1
SLIDE 1

King’s Staging

Ammar Al-Chalabi

ENCALS Training for TRICALS

Milan, 21-22 May 2016

ammar.al-chalabi@kcl.ac.uk

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Staging systems

  • ALS staging systems proposed

– Rehabilitation based scale

  • Sinaki M, Mayo Clin Proc 1978

– ALS Severity Scale

  • Hillel AD, Neuroepidemiology 1989

– Riluzole system

  • Riviere M, Arch Neurol 1998

– Xaliproden system

  • Lacomblez L, ALS and other MND 2004

– King’s Staging

  • Roche JC, Brain 2012

– ALS Dashboard

  • Bravver E, Neurology 2013

– MiToS

  • Chiò A, JNNP 2015

– Japanese Severity Scale

  • Japan intractable diseases information
  • center. http://www.nanbyou.or.jp/entry

/52

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Rationale for a staging system

  • Objective indication of

disease progression

  • Guides treatment
  • Health economics
  • End point in trials
slide-4
SLIDE 4

King’s method

  • Based on neurological

regions

  • Modified from regions

used in El Escorial criteria

  • Additional nutritional and

respiratory failure criteria

– Defined rules – Still works if loosely defined

  • Highest stage wins

Bulbar Upper limbs Lower limbs

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Roche, Brain 2012

Stage 5: Death Stage 5: Death Stage 4: Nutritional or respiratory failure Stage 4: Nutritional or respiratory failure

Stage 4a: Nutritional failure Stage 4b: Respiratory failure

Stage 3: Third region involved Stage 3: Third region involved Stage 2: Second region involved Stage 2: Second region involved Stage 1: First region involved Stage 1: First region involved

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Q1-3 Bulbar region involved Q4

  • r

5a Upper limbs involved Q8 Lower limbs involved Q5b Nutritional failure Q10 Respiratory failure Q12 Any lost Any lost Any lost Any score Score = 0 Any lost

Stage 4a Stage 4b Count regions = Stage

Mapping ALSFRS to King’s Stage

Balendra, ALS and FTD 2014

1 2 3

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Q1-3 Bulbar region involved Q4

  • r

5a Upper limbs involved Q8 Lower limbs involved Q5b Nutritional failure Q10 Respiratory failure Q12 Any lost Any lost Any lost Any score Score = 0 Any lost

Stage 4a Stage 4b Count regions = Stage

Mapping ALSFRS to King’s Stage

Balendra, ALS and FTD 2014

1 2 3

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Q1-3 Bulbar region involved Q4

  • r

5a Upper limbs involved Q8 Lower limbs involved Q5b Nutritional failure Q10 Respiratory failure Q12 Any lost Any lost Any lost Any score Score = 0 Any lost

Stage 4a Stage 4b Count regions = Stage

Mapping ALSFRS to King’s Stage

Balendra, ALS and FTD 2014

92% correlation with actual stage 1 2 3

N = 103 scores Data from King’s College Hospital Motor Nerve Clinic

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Disease proportion completed

Roche, Brain 2012

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Disease proportion completed

Roche, Brain 2012

Data from King’s College Hospital Motor Nerve Clinic

N = 1471 patients

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Left censored data Patients seen after diagnosis

Disease proportion completed

Roche, Brain 2012

Data from King’s College Hospital Motor Nerve Clinic

N = 1471 patients

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Survival from last recorded stage

Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stages 4a and 4b

Face validity = behaves as expected

slide-13
SLIDE 13

1 2 3 4 5 No change 1 N/A 59.3% 31.9% 4.6% 1.0% 3.3% 2 0% N/A 54.0% 17.0% 5.3% 23.7% 3 0% 0% N/A 42.3% 19.0% 38.7% 4 0% 0% 0% N/A 47.0% 53.0%

Stage transition probability

Balendra, JNNP 2013

Data from LiCALS (N = 214) and Trophos (N = 511) trials

To

From Face validity = behaves as expected Content validity = consistent across studies

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Duration in each health state

  • Median

9.4 months (IQR 4.2-16.5)

  • Bulbar onset 3 to 4a

shorter than for limb

  • nset

P = 0.0006

  • Bulbar onset 4a to 5

longer than for limb onset

P = 0.0003

Stage Duration (months) IQR 1 18.4

13.6-26.4

2 4.8

2.8-7.9

3 – 4a 7.9

3.9-11.2

3 – 4b 6.0

3.2-10.8

4a 5.9

2.6-9.9

4b 3.2

1.6-5.8 Balendra, JNNP 2013

Data from LiCALS (N = 214) and Trophos (N = 511) trials

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Duration in each health state

Balendra, JNNP 2013

Data from LiCALS (N = 214) and Trophos (N = 511) trials N = 725 430 436 302 260 Death

slide-16
SLIDE 16

*** *** *** ***

1 2 3 4a 4b

Balendra, unpublished

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Health utility by stage

1

Data from LiCALS (N = 214) trial

Jones, ALS and FTD 2013

Error bars are 95% CIs

slide-18
SLIDE 18

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4

2 3 4 0.12 0.24 0.38 0.12 0.26 0.14

Negative change in utility

Jones, ALS and FTD 2013

Every comparison P < 0.001 Data from LiCALS (N = 214) trial

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Depression score by stage

1 Jones, ALS and FTD 2013

Data from LiCALS (N = 214) trial Error bars are 95% CIs

slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Cognitive impairment and King’s clinical stage

Trojsi, ALS and FTD 2016

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Independent validation King’s staging South Korea time to stage data

10 20 30 40 50 60 1 2 3 4

2 3 4

months

Independent data set Oh, ALS and FTD 2015 Error bars are +/-SD

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Socioeconomic costs of ALS by stage

Oh, ALS and FTD 2015

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Independent validation King’s staging NFL dataset ALSFRSr data

12 24 36 48

ALSFRSr score

Stage 1 2-3 4

Puentes F, JNNP 2014

Independent data set Error bars are +/-SD

slide-27
SLIDE 27

NFL antibodies in plasma in ALS

Stage 1 Stages 2 and 3 Stage 4

er Puentes F, JNNP 2014

Independent data set

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Respiratory or nutritional failure? Stage 4 How many regions involved? Stage 1, 2 or 3

Very simple process

Yes No Count

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Respiratory or nutritional failure? Stage 4 How many regions involved? Stage 1, 2 or 3

Very simple process

Yes No Count

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Respiratory failure defined by NICE guideline

  • SNIP

No symptoms <40cm H2O or decrease > 10cm H2O in 3 mths Symptoms < 65cm H2O (♂) < 55cm H2O (♀)

  • FVC:

No symptoms <50% predicted. Symptoms <80% predicted.

  • Oximetry measures:

SpO2 at 94% or lower, AND pCO2 >6kPa or > 5 dips /hr on overnight oximetry

  • Symptoms of

neuromuscular respiratory failure

– Orthopnoea – Breathless on exertion – Excessive daytime sleepiness

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Nutritional failure defined by weight loss and dysphagia

  • 10% weight loss

compared with premorbid

  • Feeding failure
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Respiratory or nutritional failure? Stage 4 How many regions involved? Stage 1, 2 or 3

Very simple process

Yes No Count

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Stages 1 to 3

Count regions = Stage 1 2 3

Bulbar symptoms or signs

Upper limbs

Upper limb symptoms or signs

Bulbar Lower limbs

Lower limb symptoms or signs

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Stages 1 to 3

Count regions = Stage 1 2 3

Bulbar symptoms or signs

Upper limbs

Upper limb symptoms or signs

Bulbar Lower limbs

Lower limb symptoms or signs

If a region is obviously involved, no need to examine

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Bulbar and limb symptoms and signs

  • Symptoms

– Bulbar

  • Slurred speech
  • Swallowing difficulty
  • Hoarse voice

– Upper limbs

  • Weakness
  • Difficulty with keys, zips,

locks, buttons

– Lower limbs

  • Weakness
  • Foot drop, tripping
  • Stiff leg or legs
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Bulbar signs

  • Slurring dysarthria
  • Sialorrhoea
  • Small, wasted tongue
  • Fasciculation
  • Slow to move (spastic)
  • Brisk jaw jerk
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Upper limb signs

  • Weakness
  • Wasting
  • Increase or decrease in

tone

  • Loss of reflexes
  • Brisk reflexes

– Pectoral jerks – Finger jerks – Hoffman’s sign

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Lower limb signs

  • Weakness
  • Wasting
  • Increase or decrease in

tone

  • Loss of reflexes
  • Brisk reflexes

– Crossed adductor reflex – Ankle clonus

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Conclusions

  • King’s clinical staging is

validated in several studies

  • Behaves as expected in

clinic populations and trial populations

  • Shows some good

statistical properties

  • Balanced throughout

disease course

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Ashley Jones Rubika Balendra

slide-41
SLIDE 41