WorkGroup Meeting 15 June 2017 Commit: WSCC Technical Panel reviews - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
WorkGroup Meeting 15 June 2017 Commit: WSCC Technical Panel reviews Submittal: June 30 Initial: July 18 Formal: July 28 Review: [Final] Workplan Review Section 3: Characterization of PacCo Ag Section 5:
July 18
July 28
✓ Agenda ✓ Individual Stewardship Plan (email) ✓ Workplan (posted) ✓ Benchmarks/Monitoring (email) ✓ Prioritized Activities (email) ✓ Related … Plans and Data ✓ Critical Areas and Functions ✓ FAQ ✓ Regulatory Backstop ✓ Incentive Programs ✓ Google Earth “How To…”
meeting recordings, presentations, notes …
Time Topic Action Leader
:01
Agenda review/approval
Approve Kelly
:15 Calendar Check:
Recap Kelly
:60 Workplan Draft Review:
Baseline Conditions
Benchmark Monitoring & Adaptive Management Feedback All
:05 Next steps
Inform Kelly
Adjourn
Agenda: 15 June 2017
Month Content Action June Launch July Critical Areas & Ag: Mapping Aug Critical Area Functions Sept Work Plan Scope & Goals Oct-Nov Best Practices & Objectives Dec Monitoring and Reporting Jan’17 Stewardship Template Feb-Mar 1st Draft Apr 2nd Draft May Final Draft June Final Draft July
Inform & Align Synthesize & Recommend Refine & Scribe
“Submit” for Approval “Review”
Pacific County WorkGroup assembled and actively engaged…
When we submit the Workplan to the WSCC “Technical Panel” …
Month Content Action June Launch July Critical Areas & Ag: Mapping Aug Critical Area Functions Sept Work Plan Scope & Goals Oct-Nov Best Practices & Objectives Dec Monitoring and Reporting Jan’17 Stewardship Template Feb-Mar 1st Draft Apr 2nd Draft May Final Draft June Final Draft July
Inform & Align Synthesize & Recommend Refine & Scribe
Update:
July 18 (Olympia) “Initial Review” PacCo WorkGroup “Third Thursday” June 30: Submit Workplan to WSCC July 28 (Olympia) “Formal Review”
July 18 (Olympia) “Initial Review” July 28 (Olympia) “Formal Review”
(WSCC technically “approves”)
Thu 5/18/2017 1:36 PM
Hi Kelly – just wanted to send you this reminder as Pacific County gets ready to submit their VSP work plan to the Commission and Technical Panel - the action the work group should take is to vote to send/submit the work plan to the Commission and VSP Technical Panel, rather than vote to approve the work plan (for submittal to the Commission).
Washington State Conservation Commission
VSP WORK PLAN PUBLIC COMMENT: The public is invited to comment on any VSP work plan submitted to the VSP Technical Panel within 14 days of submittal. The public can use a public comment form to capture any comments made. The Technical Panel will be provided with any comments received at the end of that period. The form is available on the Commission’s VSP web page http://scc.wa.gov/vsp/
(beyond just acreages enrolled in VSP)
protocols?
should monitor for protections effectiveness (through regulations)
Time Topic Action Leader
:01
Agenda review/approval
Approve Kelly
:15 Calendar Check:
Recap Kelly
:60 Workplan Draft Review:
Baseline Conditions
Benchmark Monitoring & Adaptive Management Feedback All
:05 Next steps
Inform Kelly
Adjourn
Agenda: 15 June 2017
Switch to Word doc’s for section by section walkthru
To be performed every two years (biennial), by Dec 31 Then, included in biennium reports, by Aug 29 “Implementation” what we’re “doing…”
“Effectiveness” validate the implementation
“Indicators” broad-area tracking data
Priority Issue (Benchmark ID) Baseline Fecal coliform (WQl-1) PROTECT: Avoid increasing agricultural contributions to fecal coliform bacteria and nutrient loading ENHANCE: Reduce…
Baseline to be established via Conservation District monitoring conducted during first five years (2017-2022)
Pesticides (WQl-2) PROTECT: Avoid increasing agricultural contributions to known surface water and groundwater quality impairments by pesticides and herbicides ENHANCE: Reduce… Sediment / turbidity (WQl-3) PROTECT: Ensure no increase agricultural contributions to the transport of fine sediment in runoff ENHANCE: Reduce …
Completed ISPs are kept and maintained by the PCD. VSP success depends on open participation by producers. This
business information will not be disclosed. According to guidance from the Washington State Conservation Commission, statutory provisions on the confidentiality and disclosure of a farm plan also apply to ISPs collected by the
will be maintained by the PCD as confidential information. ISP results will be summarized at the watershed or sub- watershed scale such that no personally identifying information is available.
Ron Schulz is developing legal language to protect ISP information from release under public records requests; this will be included once available.