WHO WE ARE Australian Consortium for Classification Development - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

who we are
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

WHO WE ARE Australian Consortium for Classification Development - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

WHO WE ARE Australian Consortium for Classification Development (ACCD) National Centre for Classification in Health (NCCH) Western Sydney University Contracted by Independent Health Pricing Authority (IHPA) to develop and maintain the


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Australian Consortium for Classification Development (ACCD)

National Centre for Classification in Health (NCCH) Western Sydney University

WHO WE ARE

Contracted by Independent Health Pricing Authority (IHPA) to develop and maintain the ICD-10-AM, ACHI, and ACS

slide-3
SLIDE 3

For more information: www.accd.net.au

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Moving to the digital era
  • WHO’s ICD-10 and ICD-11 browser
  • CSIRO’s SHRIMP browser
  • ICD-10-AM, ACHI and ACS on screen for

feedback

  • How should we visualise ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS?

WHY VISUALISATION

slide-5
SLIDE 5

VISUALISATION REQUIREMENTS

Our requirements:

  • User-friendly and intuitive
  • Easy to Navigate around
  • Able to illustrate multi-parent relationships
slide-6
SLIDE 6

TYPES OF VISUALISATION

Force-Directed Graph Tree View Diagram Tree View

slide-7
SLIDE 7

TREE VIEW

  • Lower development efforts
  • Highly Compact
  • Clearly illustrates parent-child hierarchical

relationships

  • Does not support multi-parent, by itself
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

TREE VIEW DIAGRAM

  • Visually appealing
  • Illustrate multi-parent relationship
  • Requires a certain amount of space
  • Requires additional development effort
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Example created by Rob Schmuecker http://bl.ocks.org/robschmuecker/7880033

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Click Chapter 1 Focused on Chapter 1 and hidden unnecessary nodes

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Multiple parents Line crossing over

  • ther lines and nodes
slide-15
SLIDE 15

FORCE DIRECTED GRAPH

  • Visually appealing
  • Avoids lines overlapping
  • Illustrate multi-parent relationship
  • Requires a certain amount of space
  • Requires the most development effort
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

SUMMARY

Illustrates Multi-Parent Visual Rating Compactness Rating Suitability for Large Datasets Tree View

No Low High High

Tree View Diagram

Yes High Medium High

Force-Directed Graph

Yes High Medium High

slide-18
SLIDE 18

SUMMARY

Illustrates Multi-Parent Visual Rating Compactness Rating Suitability for Large Datasets Tree View

No Low High High

Tree View Diagram

Yes High Medium High

Force-Directed Graph

Yes High Medium High

slide-19
SLIDE 19

CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATIONS

  • Visualisation Libraries (e.g. Chart.js, GoJs)
  • Efficient for simple visualisation requirements
  • Less flexibility
  • Visualisation Frameworks (e.g. D3.js, C3.js)
  • The “ground-up” approach
  • Requires more development efforts
  • Offers flexibility
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Presented by Michael Tran Western Sydney University