Wheatland-Chili Central School District Board of Education - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Wheatland-Chili Central School District Board of Education Presentation Jennifer Sinsebox, Director of Curriculum September 25, 2012

1

2

 What do schools and districts look like when they are

• rganized around a commitment to the achievement of

high standards by all students?

 What is my role in creating, implementing, and

maintaining such a school and district?

Common Core APPR Data Driven Instruction (Inquiry Teams)

Teachers’ Center Grant Race To The Top Grant Title I and IIA Grants District’s General Fund Committees, Grade Level, Team, Faculty Meeting Times District’s Strategic Plan

3

STUDENT LEARNING

What will students learn? COMMON CORE LEARNING STANDARDS

AC

How will students learn? ENHANCING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE - APPR What will we do when students are not learning? COLLABORATIVE INQUIRY PROCESS RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION

PLAN TEACH REFLECT APPLY

4

Allows students to graduate and succeed in:

 Credit-bearing college courses without remediation

(75% in ELA and 80% in math)

 Entry Level Careers  Workforce training programs

“This work is about preparing students for college and career. It’s about improving teaching and learning.”

Commissioner King

5

 Through the Common Core State

Standards, we will ensure that students will:

• Experience literacy through the content areas
• Read texts more closely and at higher levels

 Balance on literature and informational texts (50%)

• Write from a variety of sources and write

compelling arguments

• Develop a deep understanding of math concepts

6

 Through data driven instruction, we will

• Focus on learning how to help all students learn

more effectively

• Make sure we are assessing with consistency

with a level of rigor that set students up for success

• Use common interim (formative) assessments at

least quarterly across all teachers of the same grade level

7

Predict

• Occurs prior to

viewing data

• Involves self-

reflection

• Think about

assumptions

• Make

predictions

Go Visual

• Makes Data come

alive

• Highlight

percentage correct

• Aligned with

College and Career Readiness Criteria

Observation and Analysis

• Patterns
• Trends
• Surprises

Infer and Question

• Identify other

data needs

• Identify Greatest

Area of Need

8

 Through the APPR process, we will use:

 Evidence-based observations to improve teaching and learning  Charlotte Danielson 2011 Rubric  The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument, Charlotte Danielson, 2011  Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Effective Teaching, Charlotte Danielson  Teachscape – A comprehensive online training system for teachers and classroom observers

9

We know, (and there’s a lot of research

• n the matter), that of all the factors

that contribute to student learning, the single most important one, that happens in the school, is the quality of teaching.

Charlotte Danielson Talk About Teaching!

10

• Organizational

Structures

• Community

Support

• Professional

Practice

• Student

Growth

Analysis Inform Adjust Monitor

11

Existing Measures Additional Measures (new)

 In-District  3-8 ELA, Math & Science

4/8

 Regents  STAR K-12 Reading and

Math

 Achieve 3000  Regionally created Student

Learning Objective (SLO) Pre/Post Assessments

12

 Increased percentage of students who met the standards

(scoring at or above Level 3) on the ELA assessment in:

• ELA 7 from 59% in 2010-2011 to 64% in 2011-2012.

13

 Increased percentage of students who met the standards

(scoring at or above Level 3) on the Math assessment in:

• Math 6 from 72% in 2010-2011 to 79% in 2011-2012; and
• Math 7 from 64% in 2010-2011 to 75% in 2011-2012 (with 33% of

students continuing to meet the standards with distinction).

 Increased percentage of students who met the standards

with distinction (scoring at Level 4) in:

• ELA 5 from 2% in 2010-2011 to 6% in 2011-2012;
• ELA 7 from 1% in 2010-2011 to 11% in 2011-2012;
• ELA 8 from 4% in 2010-2011 to 5% in 2011-2012;
• Math 5 from 18% in 2010-2011 to 31% in 2011-2012; and
• Science 4 from 47% in 2010-2011 to 61% in 2011-2012.

14

 Increased percentage of students who met the Regents

standards (scoring at or above 65%) in

• ELA from 95% in 2010-2011 to 98% in 2011-2012;
• Geometry from 90% in 2010-2011 to 98% in 2011-2012;
• Global History from 75% in 2010-2011 to 76% in 2011-2012;
• Earth Science from 66% in 2010-2011 to 73% in 2011-2012;
• Chemistry from 72% in 2010-2011 to 73% in 2011-2012; and
• Physics from 44% in 2010-2011 to 79% in 2011-2012.

15

 Increased percentage of students who met the Regents

standards at a mastery level (scoring at 85% or above) in

• ELA from 48% in 2010-2011 to 54% in 2011-2012;
• Integrated Algebra from 10% in 2010-2011 to 17% in 2011-

2012;

• Geometry from 0% in 2010-2011 to 30% in 2011-2012;
• Global from 25% in 2010-2011 to 42% in 2011-2012;
• Earth Science from 20% in 2010-2011 to 30% in 2011-2012;

and

• Physics from 11% in 2010-2011 to 39% in 2011-2012.

16

Thomas J. Connor Elementary School WCCS Middle/High School K-5 ELA

 Critical Analysis and

Evaluation K-5 Math

 Measurement and problem

solving skills 6-12 Teachers

 Literary and Written

Expression

 Constructing and Conveying

Meaning from text or other representations of information

17

 Administer and analyze formative assessments to

measure ongoing student progress at grade levels and in content areas.

 Provide research based interventions to students in

need.

 Engage in professional development focused on

Effective Teaching Practices.

18

3-8 ELA

19

2% 11% 83% 4% 0% 21% 44% 35% 6% 21% 67% 6% 14% 27% 53% 6% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Wheatland-Chili Central School District

2011-2012 NYSTP ELA Assessment - Grade 3 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level

2008-2009… 2009-2010… 2010-2011… 2011-2012…

87% 79% 73% 59% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Total Levels 3 & 4

2008-2009 (n=53) 2009-2010 (n=43) 2010-2011 (n=63) 2011-2012 (n=51)

20

6% 14% 76% 4% 2% 18% 73% 8% 2% 30% 63% 4% 5% 41% 54% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Wheatland-Chili Central School District

2011-2012 NYSTP ELA Assessment - Grade 4 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level

2008-2009 (n=50) 2009-2010 (n=51) 2010-2011 (n=46) 2011-2012 (n=61)

80% 80% 67% 54% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Total Levels 3 & 4

2008-2009 (n=50) 2009-2010 (n=51) 2010-2011 (n=46) 2011-2012 (n=61)

21

2% 17% 68% 14% 6% 31% 49% 14% 8% 30% 60% 2% 8% 31% 55% 6% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Wheatland-Chili Central School District

2011-2012 NYSTP ELA Assessment - Grade 5 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level

2008-2009 (n=66) 2009-2010 (n=51) 2010-2011 (n=60) 2011-2012 (n=59)

82% 63% 62% 61% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Total Levels 3 & 4

2008-2009 (n=66) 2009-2010 (n=51) 2010-2011 (n=60) 2011-2012 (n=59)

22

0% 5% 85% 9% 14% 34% 51% 0% 14% 32% 52% 2% 6% 43% 49% 2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Wheatland-Chili Central School District

2011-2012 NYSTP ELA Assessment - Grade 6 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level

2008-2009 (n=55) 2009-2010 (n=70) 2010-2011 (n=50) 2011-2012 (n=53)

94% 51% 54% 51% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Total Levels 3 & 4

2008-2009 (n=55) 2009-2010 (n=70) 2010-2011 (n=50) 2011-2012 (n=53)

23

24

25

3-8 Math

26

27

4% 6% 48% 42% 4% 23% 50% 23% 7% 22% 41% 30% 2% 24% 53% 22% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Wheatland-Chili Central School District

2011-2012 NYSTP Math Assessment - Grade 4 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level

2008-2009 (n=50) 2009-2010 (n=52) 2010-2011 (n=46) 2011-2012 (n=61)

90% 73% 72% 75% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Total Levels 3 & 4

2008-2009 (n=50) 2009-2010 (n=52) 2010-2011 (n=46) 2011-2012 (n=61)

28

9% 18% 48% 25% 6% 27% 43% 24% 5% 25% 52% 18% 8% 24% 37% 31% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Wheatland-Chili Central School District

2011-2012 NYSTP Math Assessment - Grade 5 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level

2008-2009 (n=67) 2009-2010 (n=51) 2010-2011 (n=60) 2011-2012 (n=49)

73% 67% 70% 68% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Total Levels 3 & 4

2008-2009 (n=67) 2009-2010 (n=51) 2010-2011 (n=60) 2011-2012 (n=49)

29

0% 2% 53% 45% 14% 20% 36% 30% 4% 24% 36% 36% 2% 19% 49% 30% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Wheatland-Chili Central School District

2011-2012 NYSTP Math Assessment - Grade 6 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level

2008-2009 (n=55) 2009-2010 (n=70) 2010-2011 (n=50) 2011-2012 (n=53)

98% 66% 72% 79% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Total Levels 3 & 4

2008-2009 (n=55) 2009-2010 (n=70) 2010-2011 (n=50) 2011-2012 (n=53)

30

0% 5% 67% 28% 0% 21% 42% 38% 11% 25% 31% 33% 6% 19% 42% 33% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Wheatland-Chili Central School District

2011-2012 NYSTP Math Assessment - Grade 7 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level

2008-2009 (n=58) 2009-2010 (n=53) 2010-2011 (n=72) 2011-2012 (n=48)

95% 79% 64% 75% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Total Levels 3 & 4

2008-2009 (n=58) 2009-2010 (n=53) 2010-2011 (n=72) 2011-2012 (n=48)

31

2% 22% 71% 5% 5% 43% 42% 10% 4% 34% 50% 13% 17% 33% 38% 11% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Wheatland-Chili Central School District

2011-2012 NYSTP Math Assessment - Grade 8 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level

2008-2009 (n=59) 2009-2010 (n=60) 2010-2011 (n=56) 2011-2012 (n=66)

76% 52% 63% 49% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Total Levels 3 & 4

2008-2009 (n=59) 2009-2010 (n=60) 2010-2011 (n=56) 2011-2012 (n=66)

32

Regents 2012

33

34

35

36

37

76% 37% 83% 41% 84% 34% 75% 25% 76% 42% 31% 0% 63% 13% 69% 31% 45% 9% 43% 10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 65% or above 85% or above 65% or above 85% or above 65% or above 85% or above 65% or above 85% or above 65% or above 85% or above 2007-2008 Total Tested: 75 SWD Tested: 13 2008-2009 Total Tested: 66 SWD Tested: 8 2009-2010 Total Tested: 76 SWD Tested: 13 2010-2011 Total Tested: 72 SWD Tested: 11 2011-2012 Total Tested: 76 SWD Tested: 21

Wheatland-Chili Central School District Regents Results Five-year Profile Wheatland-Chili High School Global History

All Students Students with Disabilities

38

96% 75% 88% 64% 93% 63% 98% 76% 92% 59% 83% 50% 50% 21% 86% 43% 100% 70% 80% 30% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 65% or above 85% or above 65% or above 85% or above 65% or above 85% or above 65% or above 85% or above 65% or above 85% or above 2007-2008 Total Tested: 52 SWD Tested: 6 2008-2009 Total Tested: 58 SWD Tested: 14 2009-2010 Total Tested: 64 SWD Tested: 7 2010-2011 Total Tested: 59 SWD Tested: 10 2011-2012 Total Tested: 61 SWD Tested: 10

Wheatland-Chili Central School District Regents Results Five-year Profile Wheatland-Chili High School US History

All Students Students with Disabilities

39

40

41

42

43

 Comments or Questions

44