what territorial conflicts
play

What territorial conflicts? 1. The delimitation of the maritime - PDF document

Professor Reinhard Drifte What territorial conflicts? 1. The delimitation of the maritime border between Japan, China and Korea in the ECS Territorial conflicts in Northeast 2. The sovereignty over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Asia The East China


  1. Professor Reinhard Drifte What territorial conflicts? • 1. The delimitation of the maritime border between Japan, China and Korea in the ECS Territorial conflicts in Northeast • 2. The sovereignty over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Asia – The East China Sea Islands between Japan and China Professor Reinhard Drifte • 3. Inclusion of Ieodo/Suyan/Socotra Rock into ラインハテ デリフテ 杜浩 Emeritus Professor, Newcastle U. 大学名誉 China`s or Korea`s EEZ? 教授 HP: www.rfwdrifte.ukgo.com/ The nature of territorial disputes Japan ‐ China issues • Core of `traditional security`: maintaining • Sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands (now territorial integrity Japan in de facto control) • `zero sum game` • Delimitation of the sea border in the East China Sea (which international law principle to • Complicating factors here: strategic concerns apply?; 200 nm EEZ importance); (access to open sea, SLOCs); economic stakes (energy; fishery; deep sea mining for mineral • Linkage (prerequisite?) of both maritime nodules); cultural/political divides; burden of border & Senkaku history (Japanese past aggression) Map of East China Sea East China Sea • Contrast between theory of natural TROUBLED W ATERS prolongation of the continental shelf (China) vs. median line between overlapping EEZs (Japan) Seminr “NORTH EAST ASIA: Territorial Disputes and Divided Countries” 18 March 2009 at Daiwa Foundation Japan House

  2. Professor Reinhard Drifte Japan ‐ China: Main points Japan ‐ China: Where are we now? China`s late claim to Senkaku in 1970 (1895 ‐ 1970 gap!) 18 June 2008 agreement on cooperation in the ECS as a commitment to negotiate • • a Treaty (agreement on principles): 1980s: China`s begin of exploration + exploitation in the ECS • ‐ joint development in a clearly defined area as a first step (Northern part of ECS) + • 1996 both sign UN CLOS • commitment to consult about other areas outside of the above area for joint Japan`s misleading signals: `shelving` of Senkaku issue 1972, 1979; Japan`s • development abstention from even exploration until 2004; 1997 ‐ 2001 JBIC/ADB co ‐ ‐ participation of Japanese legal persons in the development of the Chunxiao oil • financing of China`s Pinghu field (70 km off median line) and gas field in accordance with Chinese laws 2001 Prior Notification Agreement; 1997 Fisheries Agreement (`joint ‐ the agreement indicates implicit Chinese acknowledgment of the median line • • because the defined zone for joint development approximately straddles this line fishing areas`) and differentiates between Chunxiao and the joint development zone From 1998 ‘Consultations on the Law of the Sea and the Delimitation of • Concern about military clashes (increased presence of Chinese warships/fighters; • the EEZ’ 2004 harassment of Japanese exploration) From 2004 to 2008 ‘Japan ‐ China Consultations concerning the East China • Dec 08: J reports continued Chinese exploration in the Tianwaitian gas field (50–60 • Sea and Other Matters’ km from the median line, started in September 2005!) Not even begin of negotiations despite Japanese reminders! • Tianwa itian oil platform Japan ‐ China ‐ ROK issues • 21 September 2005: • Link to Japanese occupation before 1945 (Dokto/Takeshima 1910; Senkaku/Diaoyu Jan 1895 just before end of Sino ‐ Start of extracting gas? Japanese war) • January 2008 Japanese • No ECS maritime border agreed between J ‐ ROK, ROK ‐ China protests about China`s • Overlap of J ‐ ROK ‐ China EEZ claims at Northern end of ECS continuing extraction • 1974 Japan ‐ South Korea treaty (1978 J ratification; Chinese protests, 1980 ‐ 86 J ‐ ROK fruitless explorations) • Japan accepted SK`s extended continental shelf approach! • 1997 Japan ‐ China Fisheries Agreement: Korea claims overlap of EEZs; demands trilateral negotiations China ‐ Korea: Ieodo/Suyan Rock Iedo/Suyan Rock • 82 nm southwest of Jejudo; 147 nm miles northeast of China • In 1900 discovered by the British merchant ship `Socotra`, 1951 claimed by Korea • surface area of 370,000 sq m. at the depth of 50 meters, highest point on the rock is 4.6 meters below sea level • Korean weather station • China: rock is within China`s 200 nm EEZ! • 2000: China and ROK agree that it is a submerged rock, NOT an island, therefore no sovereignty issue, only EEZ issue Seminr “NORTH EAST ASIA: Territorial Disputes and Divided Countries” 18 March 2009 at Daiwa Foundation Japan House

  3. Professor Reinhard Drifte China ‐ Korea: Maritime border Solutions • Liberalist theory: `shared economic interests lead to • No agreement cooperation`? • Realist theory: `balance of power`; `anarchic international society, maximizing one`s own interest` • Last negotiations: • International Law: arbitration of conflicting interests based on a common cannon of rules, but subject to political influence in the absence of international court intervention July 2008 (13 th • None of the 3 countries accepts international arbitration for any of the sovereignty or EEZ delimitation issues round) Relevant publications by the author: • R. Drifte, `Japanese – Chinese territorial disputes in the East China Sea – between military confrontation and economic cooperation`, LSE Asia Research Centre Working Paper no. 24, April 2008, http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/asiaResearchCentre/ pdf/WorkingPaper/ARCWorkingPaper24Drifte2008.pdf • R. Drifte, The 18 June 2008 Agreement, http://www.giga ‐ hamburg.de/dl/download.php?d=/content/publikation en/archiv/ja_aktuell/jaa_0803_fokus_drifte.pdf (space= lower hyphen!) Seminr “NORTH EAST ASIA: Territorial Disputes and Divided Countries” 18 March 2009 at Daiwa Foundation Japan House

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend