What is the Age of the Earth? Beth Haven Creation Conference May - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

what is the age of the earth
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

What is the Age of the Earth? Beth Haven Creation Conference May - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

What is the Age of the Earth? Beth Haven Creation Conference May 13, 2017 Limits of empirical knowledge Galaxies 22 20 Man created to have dominion Solar over nature starting with the 18 System correspondence God created 16 between


slide-1
SLIDE 1

What is the Age

  • f the Earth?

Beth Haven Creation Conference May 13, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • 6
  • 2
  • 4
  • 8
  • 10
  • 12
  • 14
  • 16
  • 18

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Age of Universe Life Beginning Historical Period One Year One Hour One Second Sound Period Visible Light Period X-Ray Period

  • 12
  • 10
  • 8
  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Time: Log10 (seconds)

Atom Molecules Bacteria

Spatial Domain of Nature

One cm Man Mountains Sun Solar System Galaxies

Space: Log10 (cm) Temporal Domain of Nature

Deductions Deductions Conjecture Ultra-speed filming Telescope Deductions Microscope

Limits of empirical knowledge

14

BUT the scientific method requires special additions (worldview dependent conjectures) in order to penetrate unobservable past & future domains Man created to have dominion

  • ver nature starting with the

correspondence God created between many of man’s empirically-based conceptions and nature’s design

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What methods can science use to study history?

15

Ernest Mayr (1904–2005) “Evolutionary biology, in contrast with physics and chemistry, is a historical science: . . . Laws and experiments are inappropriate . . . Instead one constructs a historical narrative, consisting of a tentative reconstruction of the particular scenario that led to the events one is trying to explain.” [Emphasis

supplied] Scientific American Vol 283 (2000) 80

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What methods can science use to study history?

16

“Our theory of evolution has become . . . one which cannot be refuted by any possible observation. . . . Ideas, either without basis or based on a few laboratory experiments carried out in extremely simplified systems, have attained certainty far beyond their validity. They have become part

  • f an evolutionary dogma accepted by most of us as part of
  • ur training.”

Birch, L.C, and Ehrlich, P.R., “Evolutionary History and Population Biology,” Nature Vol 214 (1967) 349–352.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Shall I bow to my Creator?

  • YES!

– ancient monotheism – ancient Israel – Bible – fundamentalism

  • CREATOR/creature

– God || man | nature – everlasting distinctions

  • PERSONAL

SOVEREIGN

– ultimate responsibility

  • NO!

– ancient myths – eastern religions – western philosophy – modern theology

  • Continuity of Being

– nature > gods > man – transmutation / evolution

  • IMPERSONAL FATE &

CHANCE

– ultimate victimization

17

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The fictional “war between science and religion”

18

“The idea of a war between science and religion is a relatively recent invention . . . In late 19th century England, several small groups of scientists and scholars organized under the leadership of Thomas H. Huxley to overthrow the cultural dominance of Christianity. . . . Their goal was to replace the Christian worldview with scientific naturalism. . . . They understood very well that they were replacing one religion by another, for they described their goal as the establishment of the ‘church scientific’ . Huxley even referred to his scientific lectures as ‘lay sermons.’ ”

Nancy Pearcey & Charles Thaxton, The Soul of Science (Crossway Books, 1994), 19

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Shall I bow to my Creator?

  • YES!

– ancient monotheism – ancient Israel – Bible – fundamentalism

  • CREATOR/creature

– God || man | nature – everlasting distinctions

  • PERSONAL

SOVEREIGN

– ultimate responsibility

  • NO!

– ancient myths – eastern religions – western philosophy – modern theology

  • Continuity of Being

– nature > gods > man – transmutation / evolution

  • IMPERSONAL FATE &

CHANCE

– ultimate victimization

19

slide-8
SLIDE 8

A candle “clock”

20

Lo – [L/t] * T = Lm

Starting length (in) Burn rate (in/hr) Burn duration (hr) Measured length now (in)

[Lo – Lm] [L/t]

= T

Solving for burn duration . . .

slide-9
SLIDE 9

A radioisotope “clock”

21

Lo – [L/t] * T = Lm [Lo – Lm] [L/t]

= T

Initial condition & rate of change/decay Solving equation for “age”

Vernon P. Cupps, “Clocks in Rocks” (Acts & Facts, October 2014),10

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Discordant dates from radioactive “clocks”

22

  • 1. New Zealand, Mt. Ngauruhoe, eruption 1954 (60 yrs ago

at dating which gave dates from 270,000 years (K-Ar), 133 million years (Rb-Sr), 200 million years (Sm- Samarium—Nd-Neodymium), 3.9 billion years (Pb-Pb)

  • 2. East African Rift Valleys lava from Pliocene

(supposedly < 5 million years old) which gave a Rb-Sr isochron age of 773 million years

  • 3. Igneous rocks on rim of Grand Canyon give dates the

same or older than the igneous rocks at the bottom.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Discordant dates from radioactive Carbon-14 “clocks”

23

Lo – [L/t] * T = Lm [Lo – Lm] [L/t]

Cosmic ray protons penetrate Earth’s magnetic field to turn N-14 into C-14 C-14 become CO2 which plant life absorb in same ratio of C-12/C-14 as surrounding atmosphere Plant dies isolating C-14 from surrounding atmosphere so it decays with half-life of 5730 years. Why is it found in ALL rock strata, even in diamonds, that are millions of years old?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Conjectures can create many scientific origin theories

24

“It is universally thought that it is impossible to construct a falsifiable theory which is consistent with the thousands of

  • bservations indicating an age of billions of years, but which

holds that the Universe is only a few thousand years old. I consider such a view to be a slur on the ingenuity of theoretical physicists: we can construct a falsifiable theory with any characteristic you care to name.”

Frank Tipler, Proceedings of the 1984 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2, 900