Karen L. Henderson, Porzak Browning & Bushong LLP
Western Water Law
NATIONAL MITIGATION & ECOSYSTEM BANKING CONFERENCE Wetland Mitigation and Water Rights May 7, 2014
Western Water Law ECOSYSTEM BANKING CONFERENCE Wetland Mitigation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Karen L. Henderson , Porzak Browning & Bushong LLP NATIONAL MITIGATION & Western Water Law ECOSYSTEM BANKING CONFERENCE Wetland Mitigation and Water Rights May 7, 2014 Riparian vs. Prior Appropriation There are two major doctrines
Karen L. Henderson, Porzak Browning & Bushong LLP
NATIONAL MITIGATION & ECOSYSTEM BANKING CONFERENCE Wetland Mitigation and Water Rights May 7, 2014
❖ There are two major doctrines that influence water law in the United States -
riparian and prior appropriation.
❖ Under a riparian system, landowners have the right to make reasonable use of
the water that flows across, originates on, or adjoins their property.
❖ Under a prior appropriation system, the use of water is administered under a
priority system often described as "first in time, first in right."
The 100th Meridian has traditionally been considered the dividing line between the wetter eastern half and the drier western half of the United States.
100th Meridian
–Bettina Boxall
“Battles over water in the West are always about something
❖ The prior appropriation doctrine is a priority system that allocates
water in times of shortage.
❖ Senior rights are fully satisfied before junior rights.
1886 Priority 1902 Priority 1954 Priority 1978 Priority 1912 Priority
Prior Appropriation Prior Appropriation
with remnants of riparian law
Hybrid
Riparian and Prior Appropriation
Arizona Oregon California Colorado Washington Idaho Nevada New Mexico Montana Utah Wyoming
❖
The states have the primary authority and responsibility for the allocation and management of water resources within their boundaries.
❖
While each state has adopted principles of the prior appropriation doctrine as a foundation, the specific laws controlling the allocation and administration of water is a matter of state law.
❖
While there are some consistent themes, water law is different in each state.
❖
A water right is a right to use water.
❖
The defining elements of a water right typically include:
❖
a priority date
❖
an amount (defined by flow rate (cfs) or by volume (acre-feet))
❖
type of use
❖
point of diversion
❖
place of use
❖
source of water
❖
Most states require that the water be removed from the natural source by way of diversion or
instream flow and recreation rights.
❖
Stages of a water right: Conditional decree Absolute decree Permit Certificate/License
❖
As a general rule, a water right is required in order to use surface or groundwater.
❖
There are exceptions to this general rule, particularly related to the use of groundwater.
❖
As examples:
❖
In California, the use of groundwater does not require a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board, but local groundwater districts may require certain approvals or fees for the use.
❖
In other states where groundwater is regulated, certain types of groundwater use can be considered an exempt use.
❖
A water right provides the legal right to use water and protects the use against injury from more junior uses or changes of existing water rights.
❖
A water right helps ensure the long-term success of a mitigation project.
State Responsible Entity Approval Process Website links for additional information Arizona Department of Water Resources Permit then Certificate of Water Right
http://www.azwater.gov/azdwr/
California State Water Resources Control Board Permit then License
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrights/bo ard_info/water_rights_process.shtml
Colorado Water Court Water Court Decree
http://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/Water/In dex.cfm
Idaho Department of Water Resources Permit then License
https://www.idwr.idaho.gov/
Nevada State Engineer Permit then Certificate of Appropriation http://water.nv.gov/waterrights/index.cfm New Mexico State Engineer Permit
http://www.ose.state.nm.us/water_info_water_ rights.html
Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Permit
http://dnrc.mt.gov/wrd/water_rts/default.asp
Oregon Water Resources Department Permit then Certificate
http://www.oregon.gov/owrd/Pages/index.aspx
Utah State Engineer Permit then Certificate of Appropriation http://www.waterrights.utah.gov/ Washington Department of Ecology Permit then Certificate of Water Right
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wr/rights/wa ter-right-home.html
Wyoming State Board of Control, includes the State Engineer Permit then Certificate of Appropriation http://seo.wyo.gov/agency-divisions/board-of-
control
❖
A water rights due diligence investigation may be needed to determine whether the rights can be used to support the mitigation bank or whether a change of the right would be required.
❖
This process may include:
❖
Water rights can generally be changed if there is no injury to other water rights.
❖
Whether a change is needed depends on the facts and state law, but consider:
❖
As a general rule, water rights are considered separate property rights that can be leased and conveyed separately from the land.
❖
The nature of an interest in water may be:
❖
real property - ownership of the water right itself
❖
personal property - ownership of a contractual right to use a water right owned by another
❖
both real and personal property - such as shares of stock in a ditch or reservoir company
❖
Some of the states with a two-step administrative permit system (i.e. permit then a final certificate) treat the initial permit as personal property and the final certificate as real property.
❖
Mechanisms such as a deed restriction or conservation easement can be used to secure the water rights to the mitigation bank property.
❖
A conservation easement is a legally enforceable agreement between a property owner and an easement holder (i.e. a land trust or public agency) that permanently protects conservation values by restricting future development and other harmful activities.
❖
Water rights are material to maintaining conservation values such as wetlands.
–Michael McClary