West Baltimore Health Enterprise Zone
A Project of the West Baltimore Primary Care Access Collaborative
April 2, 2015
Community Health Resources Commission
West Baltimore Health Enterprise Zone A Project of the West - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
West Baltimore Health Enterprise Zone A Project of the West Baltimore Primary Care Access Collaborative Community Health Resources Commission April 2, 2015 West Baltimore CARE: Year 3 Focus Leverage and build upon the collaborative
Community Health Resources Commission
2
‒ Year 3: $1,041,887 ‒ Year 2 Funds not expended (carried over into Year 3): $146,635 3
Figure 1. WB HEZ Geographic Area
4
Systems of Learning
Coordination Meetings among Clinical Partners
Infrastructure for Collection of Clinical Measures
Collaboration
Classes Taught by Community Partners
Classes Taught by Community Partners Increased CVD Screening
Reporting (NQF or UDS)
Providers
Improved Care Coordination
Bon Secours
for CHWs Increased Community Based Risk Factor Reduction
Partnership grants
Classes
Management Classes
5
Health Promotion Courses
participants
Community Health Outreach
and patients
and Clinic Visits
Incentivizing Risk Reduction
community members
*Note: All numbers are through December 2014.
Strategy Outcomes 6
Tax Credits and Loan Repayment
Health Career Scholarships
(8wk-24month in length)
PCMH
Partners
*Note: All numbers are through December 2014.
7
Strategy Outcomes
Community Health Outreach Team
Training
Community Health Worker trainings
*Note: All numbers are through December 2014.
8
Strategy Outcomes
Fitness Classes
participants
Nutrition Support
medical dietary instruction
Bon Secours)
Engagement
programming
participants
*Note: All numbers are through December 2014.
9
Strategy Outcomes
Care Coordination
Health Workers 10
Strategy Outcomes
*Note: All numbers are through December 2014.
Challenge Lesson Learned
1) Data Integrity Due to Multiple Systems used across Partner Organizations and Program Activities Consolidating data collection mechanisms and responsibilities as much as possible limits errors. 2) Staff Turnover Choosing individuals who can be flexible in order to work in a pilot program environment where change is constant. 3) Introduction of New Software Creating a realistic plan for implementation and training improves adoption and creates clear expectations across stakeholders. 4) Ability to identify High Utilizers The use of a single definition across Clinical Partners and ability to track high utilizers in our database increases our ability to impact legislatively defined
5) Alignment of program strategies and budget with legislative intent Increasing our use of metrics allows us to quickly determine if our strategies/activities work toward the legislative intent of the program.
11
12
13 Program Components Added Clinical Expertise Resource for CHWs Two-tiered Care Coordination to Meet High Utilizer Needs Expanded Patient Tracking Software 30-Day Care Plans and Behavior-Based Goals Streamlined Referrals Proactive, Structured Patient Contacts Improved Caseload Management
14
15 Strategies Care Coordination: Re-designed program Technology: Patient Tracking Platform and Care at Hand Referrals from WBPCAC Clinical Partner Hospitals: St. Agnes, Bon Secours, UM Midtown, UM Medical Center, Sinai of Baltimore
1) High Utilizers to CHWs (Tier 1) 1,125 2) High Utilizers to CHWs who need prolonged support (Tier 2) 450 3) Home visits 1,125 4) Phone contact 3,150 5) Clinic Visits 150 6) Health Screenings (done at each encounter) 4,725 7) Number of medically homeless participants referred to a PCP 100 8) By March 31, 2016, increase by 3% the percentage of WBPCAC hypertensive adult patients with blood pressures lower than 140/90mmHg. 224** 9) By March 31, 2016, increase by 3% the percentage of WBPCAC diabetic adult patients with LDL-C <100 mg/dL. 272*** 10) By March 31, 2016, increase by 3% the percentage of WBPCAC diabetic adult patients with HbA1c under control. 260**** 16
*Note: Goals are calculated with planned start of program to start in June 2015. ** based off of a targeted population of 7,481 (denominator for quality measure ) in calendar year 2013; ***based off of targeted population of 9,075 in calendar year 2013****based off of targeted population of 8,650 (denominator for quality measure) in calendar year 2013
($453,629- 38% of funding total)
‒ Technology: $78,800 ‒ Evaluation: $23,870 ‒ Implantation Support: $350,959 ‒ $20,000 (Pilot Implementation, Training, Continuing Education) + ‒ $330,959 (6.5 FTE Assignment)
Risk Factor Reduction ($460,500 39% of funding total)
‒ Strategy 2.1 - Increased Identification and Screening of Individuals with CVD or at risk for CVD: $118,640
$23,870 (clinical measure evaluation) +$36,770 (biometric assessment vendor) ‒ Strategy 2.2 - Recruitment of Primary Care Professionals and Paraprofessionals: $20,000
17
38% 39% 23%
Strategies and Resource Allocation
Care Coordination Community Based Risk Factor Reduction Meeting and Other Expenses (Indirect, Fringe, etc.)
($456,630- 39% of funding total)
‒ Strategy 2.3 - Scholarships to Expand Care Teams with Community Members: $117,878
‒ Strategy 2.4 - Patient Education: $25,000
classes) ‒ Strategy 2.5 - Physical Activity: $22,000
‒ Strategy 2.6 - Community Partnership Grants: $50,000
‒ Implementation Support 2.5 FTE: $106,982
18
19