web radr
play

WEB-RADR Use of mobile technologies and social media in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

WEB-RADR Use of mobile technologies and social media in pharmacovigilance Smartphones and mobile apps 1.3 million apps available for 1.75 billion smartphones in use android users (1.2 million for worldwide iOS) 34.6 million in the


  1. WEB-RADR Use of mobile technologies and social media in pharmacovigilance

  2. Smartphones and mobile apps 1.3 million apps available for • 1.75 billion smartphones in use • android users (1.2 million for worldwide iOS) 34.6 million in the UK • Around 6,000 health related apps • 62% of UK adults have a • NHS has its own app store • smartphone 24% also have a tablet •

  3. Smartphones and mobile apps 1.6 million apps available for • 2.6 billion smartphones in use • android users (1.5 million for worldwide iOS) 37.8 million in the UK • Around 100,000 health related • apps 76% of UK adults have a • smartphone NHS has its own app store • 54% of households have a tablet •

  4. Social media 1.49 billion active Facebook users 304 million active Twitter • • users 1.3 billion on mobile devices • 80% active on mobile • 65% log on every day • 500 million tweets per day • 35-54 largest age group • worldwide

  5. WEB-RADR Consortium

  6. High level aims and deliverables App Patient/ HCP needs analysis for mobile reporting and receipt of feedback during first year • Initial mobile app developed by April 2015; enhancement based on user feedback • throughout the project Off the shelf package implementation guide and interface available by the end of the project • Social media Novel techniques for identification of safety data and signal detection/ evaluation in social • media between throughout the project Social media analysis platform for the whole pharmacovigilance community by project close • Scientific impact evaluation & policy Surveillance and communications policies based on robust scientific evaluation of the tools • developed

  7. Mobile Apps UK App Launched in July by • the Minister for Life Sciences Uptake is free to users • Dutch and Croatian apps in • development Downloads: • - iOS: 1030 - Android: 406 (as of 1 st October 2015) Reports: • - 39 Received (as of 16 th October 2015)

  8. User evaluation Identifying barriers and facilitators for • using mobile app - To report ADRs - For accessing drug (safety) information Segmenting target groups • - Patients: adolescents, orphan disease populations, elderly - Healthcare professionals Targeted & differential app development • Validate in a range of settings • - Lab based - Clinical settings - Surveys Comparison to patient notes •

  9. Feedback

  10. Enhancement requests Unified login details • Push notifications • Enhancements to ADR details • More news content • Devices, Defects & • Counterfeits Additional Monitoring status • All news option • Minor tweaks • Barcode scanning •

  11. What is the value of social media? Massive volume of discussion & Expectatio patient- n that reported someone is outcomes Unique stream listening Not intended to of intelligence supplant that is not traditional necessarily post-marketing captured in surveillance other data sources 11

  12. Social Media Monitoring Platform Social media monitoring and • analytics platform Collects, aggregates, • classifies and visualizes public content from social media platforms describing adverse drug events Designed to support post- • marketing drug safety surveillance

  13. Data flow: Data acquisition Social ¡Data ¡ • Public posts are acquired from Facebook, Twitter and patient forums via Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), using medical product names as search terms.

  14. Data flow: Filtering • An algorithm trained to recognize language that describes a possible adverse drug reaction classifies and filters the posts using a vernacular-to- regulatory dictionary.

  15. Data flow: Curation Social ¡Data ¡ • Human curation further trains the classifier, improves symptom dictionary, ensures symptoms are attributed to appropriate product, and removes false positives.

  16. Data flow: Dissemination Social ¡Data ¡ Filtering ¡ Curation ¡ Dashboard ¡ • Aggregate and granular data are disseminated and visualized in an interactive, web- based dashboard.

  17. Where are we now? 188 products identified: • - 13 therapeutic areas - 17 additional monitoring products - 5 orphan drugs - 15 biological medicines Begun data collection: • - 1,215,523 posts mentioning those products - 1,189,534 removed using “spam” filters - 25,989 “meaningful mentions” - 318 Proto-AEs Initial dashboard developed • Gold standard reference set • developed to enhance analytics

  18. What might we find? Consortium keen for global • applicability Concordance with existing • data? What else can social media • tell us - Abuse? - Misuse? - Counterfeit? Geo pharmacovigilance a • possibility?

  19. Scientific Impact evaluation Essential Aim: To determine whether novel media applications (apps and social media) add value to existing pharmacovigilance methodologies • Add information to the established safety profile of a medicine • Enable earlier detection of new signals • Reveal new patterns or trends in reporting • Provide a means for geo- pharmacovigilance

  20. Communication Desire Response Well understood that safety • Need to assess the reaction • messages may not reach of the public to receiving a those need them in the timeframes desired response - Discussions with Healthcare professionals? - Via a mobile app? - Healthcare professional letters? - Via Twitter? - Updates to product information? - Online information? - Via Facebook? Ability to put such messages • Recommendations to be • directly in to the pockets of developed based on robust patients seems like a hugely powerful way to science, and relevant legal/ communication ethical considerations Responsibility to test that • messages to have the desired impact; impact of language used?

  21. More Questions for Pharmacovigilance Who owns the data? • Legal and/or ethical • responsibilities Is consent needed? • What are the legal & ethical • implications? Do we listen only or intervene – • when? Health responsibility vs privacy •

  22. Summary • Traditional ADR reporting and signal management methods are changing • New technologies offer new possibilities • WEB-RADR seeks to investigate, develop tools and recommend policy • Watch this space……

  23. Thank you. Questions? Email: Phil.Tregunno@mhra.gsi.gov.uk WEB-RADR@mhra.gsi.gov.uk Website: http://web-radr.eu Twitter: @WEBRADR

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend