Waste Management Tara Stephen Manager, Waste Management My Goal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Waste Management Tara Stephen Manager, Waste Management My Goal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Waste Management Tara Stephen Manager, Waste Management My Goal Today. . Briefly familiarize Council with WFOA & EPR Discuss future of Provincial Blue Box program Discuss future of County Blue Box program Waste Free Ontario
My Goal Today..
Briefly familiarize Council with WFOA & EPR Discuss future of Provincial Blue Box program Discuss future of County Blue Box program
Waste Free Ontario Act: WFOA
3
- Core purpose = shift to extended
producer responsibility (EPR) EPR: the responsibility that producers have to reduce the environmental impact of their products and packaging across the entire product management lifecycle.
– Stewardship Ontario
WFOA
4
- Applies to all current diversion programs:
– MHSW – Blue Box – WEEE – Tires
- New materials to be added over time
- Today’s focus is Blue Box
Background
- Waste Diversion Act made producers
responsible for ‘half’ the cost of Blue Box
- Municipalities required to deliver & pay ‘half’
- Constant conflict:
- Producers want control of anything they
have to pay for – muni’s are “inefficient”
- Municipalities have no control over
materials that arrive in the Blue Box, but have to find ways to manage them
Background
6
- Both producers and municipalities agree that
shifting to EPR is the answer, but… surprise…
- Difference in opinion about:
- What program would look like
- Who should deliver
- What happens to municipal assets
- Timeline for transition
- And some other things
Special Advisor on Recycling and Plastic Waste (a.k.a. Mediator)
- Province engaged Mr. David Lindsay to
provide advice on how to improve the Blue Box Program.
- Held mediation sessions with
stakeholders – AMO in attendance
- Developed understanding of key
- perational issues to be address to
provide a clear path for transition.
Mediator’s Recommendations
8
- Lindsay’s report contained a number of
recommendations to move the Blue Box to EPR
- Some are particularly of interest to the
County
2019
2020 2022 2025
Issue Direction
Consult on Regs Prep for Transition Phased Transfer of Program
Timing
9
- Recommendation:
2019
2020 2022 2025 2026 2028
Issue Direction
Consult on Regs Prep for Transition Phased Transfer of Program
Commence Contract with Emterra
(transition) End of
- riginal
contract term End of Extensions
Timing
10
- Impact to County:
Language to address legislative transition included in contract.
Standardization of Materials and Delivery
11
- Recommendation:
Standardize “the box” and the delivery.
Blue Box? Depot? Return to Retail? Return to Retail.
Standardization of Materials and Delivery
12
- Impact to County:
Change to current experience?
Other collection means? Bundle, place with papers Now: Future?
Transitioning Municipal Assets
13
- Recommendation:
Producers decide whether to use the asset
- r not… municipalities to compete.
- Impact to County:
Bid on service delivery? What to do with depot assets? By-laws if not delivering service.
Transitioning Municipal Assets
14
Eligible Sources
15
- Recommendation:
Eligible Sources
16
- Impact to the County:
County Blue Box currently services some IC&I. Will need to decide how to manage.
Achieving Success
17
- Recommendation:
Reduce Reuse Recycle Recover Dispose
Focus should be here Doesn’t count as “diversion”
Achieving Success
18
- Impact to County:
Reduce Reuse Recycle Recover Dispose
If producers don’t do a good job here… We have unnecessary cost here
Promotion and Education
19
- Recommendation:
Coordinated, province-wide education is key.
Promotion and Education
20
- Impact to County:
Education at waste collection points will still be necessary and will have cost.
County’s Perspective
21
- Targets for diversion must also include
geographic standards.
- Service levels must continue to evolve
in the future to improve access to programs
- It will be critical for producers to be