Washington State Community and Technical College Allocation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Washington State Community and Technical College Allocation Methodology

Nick Lutes, Vice President for Administrative Services Grays Harbor College February 14, 2017

2

Step 1 – Set Gross Funding level for Model Allocation Step 2 – Identify SAI Share & Allocate to Districts Step 3 – Set Aside MOA -

• (Leaves Net Allocation

for distribution to enrollments in Step 6.1) Step 4 – Set District Enrollment Target Step 5 – Determine weighted enrollment share for districts Step 6.1 – Compile District Allocation – Distribute Net Allocation after Step 3 based on Share of Step 5 Step 6.2 – Compile District Allocation – Sum Step 6.1 and Step 2 Step 6.3 – Compile District Allocation – Sum Step 6.2 and Step 3 Final Allocation (pre-stop/loss)

Building the Allocation of State appropriations

3

New Model – STEP 1 – Set Gross Funding Level $514.0 million

Remove Administrative Functions, Ed Programs and Reserves

State Board offices, Central IT and state services

($46.4) million

Remove Provisos and Earmarks

Priorities of the Legislature and State Board

($178.6) million

Identify Value of Total Appropriation

Annual State $739.0 million

4

New Model – STEP 2 – Identify Share for SAI

$478.0 million

SAI to be distributed based on District Share of:

45% for Total Points (less completions)

10% for Total Completion points 45% for Points per Student Identify Share for distribution using SAI 5 percent of total appropriation

($36.0) million Net Value of Appropriation to allocate after Step One

Annual State $514.0 million

5

New Model – STEP 3 – Set aside MOA

Net value of Appropriation to be distributed for enrollments:

$381.1 million

Set aside Minimum Operating Allowance

$2.85 million per college

($96.9) million

Net Value of Appropriation to allocate after Step Two – SAI Annual State

$478.0 million (5% SAI)

627

New Model – STEP 4 – Set District Enrollment Target

1.Compare 3 year averages: Target to Actual enrollments

• A. If target

greater than actual then assign actual (under enrolled)

• B. If Actual

greater than target then assign target (over enrolled)

• 2. Establish

Pool of enrollments to rebase &

• verenrolled

district share

• 3. Distribute

Surplus Enrollments in Rebase Pool

Group A. Subtract actual from target and sum for system (Pool) Group B. Determine district share

• f total over

enrollments

• 4. Compile
• utcomes of

1.A and 3 into a single district list of enrollment targets

• 5. Use % share

from 4 to distribute system target for new fiscal year

The system enrollment target for a new year can be different from the previous three year targets used in average

Using share determined in 2.B distribute pooled target enrollments to

• verenrolled

districts and add to 1.B Determine district % share of total target Determine sum of the district target values

Addresses Problem #4

District Enrollment Target set!

7

New Model – STEP 5 – Determine Weighted Enrollment Share

• 1. Take district
• utcomes for Step

Four

• 2. Multiply FTEs in

mission categories from 1.A by assigned weight to determined weighted value

• 3. Compile Weighted

Enrollment totals

• A. Determine district

sum of weighted mission enrollments.

• A. Distribute district

target by share of weighted category from previous year

• Unweighted
• Weighted
• Basic Education
• Other Weighted

Only Enrollments in Priority, as well as Basic Ed, will receive a weight greater than 1.0

• C. Determine district

share of weighted

• enrollments. This share

is the basis for the distribution of available funding from outcome

• f STEP THREE.
• B. Establish system-

wide total weighted enrollments

8

New Model – STEP 6 – Compile District Allocation

• 1. Distribute Funding

level determined in STEP Three by final district share from STEP Five

• 2. Add district

distribution of SAI from STEP Two to Enrollment Funding

• 3. Add MOA from STEP

Three to Enroll +SAI

• 4. Add Safeharbor

(earmark and proviso funding) Enroll +SAI +MOA+SH 93.7% of total appropriation is allocated after this action

Enrollment Funding 52.0% of total appropriation is allocated with this action.

Enroll +SAI 57.0% of total appropriation is allocated after this action

At this point the district allocations are complete and rebased. Compared to old

• method. Changes to

allocation due to rebase subject to stop/loss policies.

Enroll +SAI +MOA 70.0% of total appropriation is allocated after this action

9

What can I do to help my college?

• As the time rolls on and we use the new model, certain variables will

be importation to watch, which will allow for predictions of state funding changes:

• Enrollments
• Enrollment levels and type of enrollments have enhanced meaning
• Target changes due to over or under-enrollment
• Mix of priority Enrollments
• Funding based on performance is increasing…
• …developing an understanding about services provided and student outcomes will be

increasingly important.

10