waiting for change the two tiered wage system
play

Waiting for Change: The two tiered wage system Sylvia A. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Waiting for Change: The two tiered wage system Sylvia A. Allegretto, PhD Co-chair: Center on Wage & Employment Dynamics Institute for Research & Labor Employment University of California, Berkeley $8.00 Federal MW $7.25 $7.00 $6.00


  1. Waiting for Change: The two tiered wage system Sylvia A. Allegretto, PhD Co-chair: Center on Wage & Employment Dynamics Institute for Research & Labor Employment University of California, Berkeley

  2. $8.00 Federal MW $7.25 $7.00 $6.00 $5.00 Tip credit $5.12 $4.00 $3.00 40% $2.00 Tipped wage $2.13 50% $1.00 $0.00 Allegretto 2013

  3. $10.00 $9.00 $8.00 $7.00 $6.00 $5.00 Customer portion of the wage bill is 71% $4.00 $3.00 $2.00 Employer part of the $1.00 wage bill is 29% $0.00 Allegretto 2013

  4. Allegretto 2013

  5. Tip Credit Tipped Wage $10 $9.19 $9 $8.25 $8.00 $8 $7.25 $7.25 $7 $2.56 $6 $3.62 $5.37 $5 $5.12 $9.19 $4 $3 $5.69 $2 $3.63 $2.63 $1 $2.13 $0 Federal Massachusetts Maryland Connecticut Washington State Allegretto 2013

  6. 180% 170% Full-service restaurants 160% Private sector 150% 140% 130% 120% 110% 100% 90% 80% Source: BLS QCEW data. Allegretto 2013

  7. 140% Private employment 120% Limited service restaurants 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Source: QCEW 1990q1 to 2011q4. Allegretto 2013

  8. 60% Total workforce Tipped workers 50% Waiters 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Under 20 20 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 or older Source: Allegretto & Filion, EPI 2011. BLS CPS data.

  9. 80% 72.4% 68.0% 70% 60% 51.4% Male 48.6% 50% Female 40% 32.0% 27.6% 30% 20% 10% 0% All workers Tipped workers Waiters Source: Allegretto & Filion, EPI 2011. BLS CPS data.

  10. $20 $18 $17.25 $15.59 $16 All $14.24 $14 Male $12 Female $10.22 $9.87 $9.87 $9.72 $10 $9.22 $9.04 $8 $6 $4 $2 $0 All workers Tipped workers Waiters Source: Allegretto & Filion, EPI 2011. BLS CPS data.

  11. 25% Full Tip Credit Partial Tip Credit 19.4% 20% No Tip Credit 16.2% 16.1% 14.6% 15% 13.5% 12.1% 10% 6.7% 6.7% 6.0% 5% 0% All workers Tipped workers Waiters Source: Allegretto & Filion, EPI 2011. BLS March CPS data.

  12. 18% 15.7% 16% 14.5% 14% 12% 10% 8.4% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Private Sector Restaurant Industry Tipped workers Source: BLS CPS data Allegretto 2013

  13. 80% 71% Private sector 70% 65% 62% Acc & Food Svcs 60% 50% 37% 40% 32% 29% 30% 20% 10% 0% Health care Paid sick days Retirement Source: BLS NCS data. Allegretto 2013

  14.  Papers on TW and/or Tip Credit Provisions:  Even & Macpherson. IZA DP No. 7092, 2012 ▪ Pledged by unobserved heterogeneity as in MW literature.  Anderson & Bodvarsson. Applied Economic Letters , 2005 ▪ Higher TW doesn’t boost pay; one year of data.  Wessels. Economic Inquiry , 1997 ▪ Labor market for tipped wait staff is monopsonistic.  Wessels. Journal of Labor Research , 1993 ▪ Uses one year of retail data to show restaurant employment & hours would decrease significantly if the TC were reduced.  Look to recent MW studies  Allegretto, Dube, Reich. Industrial Relations , 2011  Dube, Lester, Reich. ReStat, 2 010

  15.  QCEW: 1990-2010  Each observation is merged with State data ▪ Unemployment rates: capture labor market conditions ▪ Relevant shares : capture labor supply ▪ MW, TW and TC: treatment & variables of interest Allegretto WEAI 2011

  16. Spec. 1 𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑗𝑗 = 𝛽 + 𝜸 𝟐 ln ( 𝑁𝑁 𝑡𝑗 ) + 𝜸 𝟑 ln ( 𝑈𝑁 𝑡𝑗 ) + 𝛿 ln ( 𝑄𝑄𝑄 𝑡𝑗 ) + θ ln ( 𝑄𝑄𝑄 𝑡𝑗 ) + 𝝔 𝒕 + 𝝊 𝒖 + 𝜁 𝑡𝑗 Spec. 2 𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑗𝑗 = = 𝛽 + ………… ………… + 𝝔 𝒕 + 𝝊 𝒆𝒖 Spec. 3 𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑗𝑗 = = 𝛽 + ………… ………… + 𝝔 𝒕 + 𝝎 𝒕 · 𝐮 + 𝝊 𝒖 Spec. 4 𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑗𝑗 = = 𝛽 + ………… ………… + 𝝔 𝒕 + 𝝎 𝒕 · 𝐮 + 𝝊 𝒆𝒖

  17. Spec. 1 𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑗𝑗 = 𝛽 + 𝜸 𝟐 ln ( 𝑁𝑁 𝑡𝑗 ) + 𝜸 𝟑 ln ( 𝑈𝑁 𝑡𝑗 ) + 𝛿 ln ( 𝑄𝑄𝑄 𝑡𝑗 ) + θ ln ( 𝑄𝑄𝑄 𝑡𝑗 ) + 𝝔 𝒕 + 𝝊 𝒖 + 𝜁 𝑡𝑗 Spec. 2 𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑗𝑗 = = 𝛽 + ………… ………… + 𝝔 𝒕 + 𝝊 𝒆𝒖 Spec. 3 𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑗𝑗 = = 𝛽 + ………… ………… + 𝝔 𝒕 + 𝝎 𝒕 · 𝐮 + 𝝊 𝒖 Spec. 4 𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑗𝑗 = = 𝛽 + ………… ………… + 𝝔 𝒕 + 𝝎 𝒕 · 𝐮 + 𝝊 𝒆𝒖

  18. Specification (1) (2) (3) (4) Earnings lnTW η 0.044** 0.037* 0.055*** 0.045** se (0.018) (0.021) (0.014) (0.017) lnMW η 0.152*** 0.136*** 0.136*** 0.127*** se (0.029) (0.042) (0.030) (0.026) Employment lnTW η -0.094** -0.013 -0.008 -0.012 se (0.040) (0.042) (0.038) (0.046) lnMW η -0.114** -0.027 -0.073** -0.026 se (0.055) (0.066) (0.034) (0.058) Y Y Division-specific time controls State-specific time trends Y Y Source: Aggregated QCEW data 1990q1-2010q4. Note: Significance *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 Allegretto 2013 Other controls: U Rates, POP, EPOP, % College Degree, personal income

  19.  The MW and TW  Can certainly be increased at federal level without negative effects.  The paid wage matters to tipped workers  More work to look closely at states with No TC ▪ Perhaps labor-labor substitution  Policy areas  Reconnect TW to MW as in H-M Bill (70%)  Other policies such as paid leave, address JIT, low- to-no benefits. Allegretto 2013

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend