Voters Attitudes and Opinions Towards Issues Facing Montgomery - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

voters attitudes and opinions towards issues facing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Voters Attitudes and Opinions Towards Issues Facing Montgomery - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Voters Attitudes and Opinions Towards Issues Facing Montgomery County Public Schools January 2018 P.O. Box 241271 Montgomery, Alabama 36124 Voice: (334)260-9124 Fax: (334)260-0633 www.SoutheastResearch.com Methodology A telephone


slide-1
SLIDE 1

January 2018

Voters’ Attitudes and Opinions Towards Issues Facing Montgomery County Public Schools

P.O. Box 241271 Montgomery, Alabama 36124 Voice: (334)260-9124 Fax: (334)260-0633 www.SoutheastResearch.com

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Methodology

  • A telephone survey was conducted January 10 – 14, 2018 with 500 registered

voters in Montgomery County, Alabama. To increase coverage, the sample was supplemented with 100 cellphone interviews. All surveys were conducted with live telephone interviewers.

  • The margin of error due to sampling is + 4.5 percentage points at the 95 percent

confidence level.

  • Data have been weighted to reflect the age characteristics registered voters in

the county. Southeast Research

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Chart 1 Voters’ Perception of Overall Quality of Montgomery Public Schools

3

Southeast Research

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Not Sure Poor Fair Good Excellent 2% 44% 30% 22% 3%

Seven out of ten voters rate the overall quality of Montgomery’s Public Schools as either fair or poor.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Chart 2 Job Performance Rating of the Montgomery Board of Education

4

Southeast Research Seven out of ten voters rate the job performance of the Montgomery Board

  • f Education as either fair or poor.

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Not Sure Poor Fair Good Excellent 3% 42% 32% 21% 2%

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Chart 3 Reasons Voters Feel the State Decided to Intervene and Take Over Montgomery’s Public School System

5

Southeast Research

Total Schools failing/in crisis/not doing a good job 29% Financial issues 16% Test scores poor 13% Discipline issues/violence/fighting 9% School board not doing a good job 8% Quality of education is poor 8% Not enough qualified teachers/staff 7% Poorly managed 6% Low graduation rate 5% Will help improve schools 4% Children’s needs not being met 3% Uncaring leaders/staff 3%

NOTE: None of the respondents indicated that intervention and takeover of the Montgomery Public Schools was not needed.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Chart 4 Who Do Voters Blame* for MPS’s Financial Problems?

6

Southeast Research

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

School Principals The County's Superintendent of Education The County's School Board 43% 72% 74%

* Represents voters who placed either a great deal of blame or some blame on a particular entity.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

6

Southeast Research

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Not Sure Total Disagree Total Agree 2% 29% 69%

Chart 5 Proportion of Voters who Agree with Dr. Richardson’s Statement that the Montgomery School Board is to Blame for the System’s Financial Problems and Students’ Low ACT Scores

Total Agree represents voters who strongly agree or somewhat agree. Total Disagree represents voters who strongly disagree or somewhat disagree.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7

Southeast Research

Chart 6 Proportion of Voters who Favor Replacing Montgomery School Board Members

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Not Sure Total Oppose Total Favor 10% 35% 55%

Total Favor represents voters who strongly favor or just favor. Total Oppose represents voters who strongly oppose or just oppose.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Chamber Summary to Board of Directors January 25, 2018

slide-10
SLIDE 10

“If a school system is under

intervention, it is the Board of Education’s fault...”

State Superintendent of Education Dr. Ed Richardson

statement to members of the Montgomery County Board of Education September 28, 2017

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Perception of Overall Quality of MPS

  • 7 of every 10 people agree that MPS:
  • Schools are failing
  • The system is in crisis
  • The issue is urgent
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Reasons State Intervened/Took Over MPS

  • No one indicated that state should not have

intervened

  • 90% stated:
  • financial, academic, lack of leadership at top
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Majority of those polled agree with Dr. Richardson’s assessment that the Board of Education is to blame for the System’s Problems and Low ACT Scores.

  • 14 - Average MPS ACT Score
  • 21 - Average Alabama Public School student ACT Score
slide-14
SLIDE 14

ASDE “failing schools list”

  • Comprised of bottom 6% of all schools in AL according to

student achievement scores on standardized exam.

  • 11 of the state’s “worst schools” are in

Montgomery, including all five non-magnet high schools.

  • MPS had the second highest number of

schools on the list, behind Bham at 14.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Montgomery Failing Schools

  • 1. Bellingrath Middle School
  • 2. Capitol Heights Middle School
  • 3. Carver Senior High School
  • 4. Davis Elementary School
  • 5. Fews Secondary Acceleration Academy
  • 6. Highland Avenue Elementary School
  • 7. Jefferson Davis High School
  • 8. Lanier Senior High School
  • 9. Lee High School
  • 10. Nixon Elementary School
  • 11. Park Crossing High School
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Public Education Impacts the Chamber’s Mission to Create Jobs and Prosperity for our City and Region:

 Economic Development  Talent Recruitment/Retention  Military Preservation & Growth  Workforce Development  Tourism/Quality of Life  Healthcare

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Conclusion

We have a critical issue in MGM. It is impacting the Future. It starts with Leadership. The time is Now.