Vote For Your Favorite Costume! B C A D E F "Dog - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Vote For Your Favorite Costume!

1

"Dog Parade" by editrixie is licensed under CC BY-ND 2.0 and annulla

A B C D E F

Learning Session 2

Day 2 October 17, 2019

Welcome and Recap of Day 1

Jennifer Leonardo, PhD, MSW, LCSW Children’s Safety Network, Director

3

Technical Tips

4

Call (866) 835-7973 to listen and be heard Download resources in the File Share pod (above the slides) Mute yourself when you’re not talking (use phone’s mute button or press *#) This session is being recorded Use the chat (bottom left) to ask questions at any time This webinar is subject to the CSLC data agreement

*

CSLC Cohort 1 Highlights So Far

5

All Teach/All Learn

6

All Teac ach All ll Learn

Successes to Share Questions for Peers Quality Improvement Questions

7

Welcome and Recap of Day 1

Jennifer Leonardo, Director

Review homework highlights

Erin Ficker, CSLC Co-Manager

Team Present storyboard

LA Suicide and Self-Harm Prevention

Using Data Effectively

Maria Katradis, CSLC Co-Manager & Data Manager

Team Present storyboard

IA Poisoning Prevention

Team Present storyboard

WA Motor Vehicle Traffic Safety

Closing Remarks and Next Steps

Jenny Stern-Carusone, Associate Director

Day 2

Review Homework Highlights

Erin Ficker CSLC Co-Manager

8

9

Where are you in your improvement journey? Develop? Test? Implement? Spread?

Homework Reflection Questions

Homework Reflection Questions

1.

• 1. How did y

did you appr approach u usin sing t the c checklist? 2.

• 2. What

at did y did you lear arn ab about y your pr project? 3.

• 3. What

at w was t as the mo most c chal allenging par part o

• f goin

ing t through t the Checklist ist? 4.

• 4. After g

r going t throu

• ugh t

h the Improvement Che hecklist, a are re y you

• u in the

he s stage of

• f

im impr provement y you in init itially t thought y you were? 5.

• 5. Bas

Based o

• n wh

what at y you lear arned, wh what at’s n next f for your w work o

• n this st

strategy?

10

11

Improvement Checklist

12

Improvement Checklist

13

Improvement Checklist

14

Improvement Checklist

15

Improvement Checklist

Questions?

16

Please enter your questions in the chat pod

Suicide and Self-Harm Prevention Storyboard Presentation

Jane Herwehe, LA Debra Perna, LA Rosaria Trichilo, LA

17

Facilitator: Maria Katradis, SSHP Topic Lead

Louisiana: Suicide and Self Harm Prevention

Presenters: Jane Herwehe he, M , MPH Debra P a Perna, a, R RN Rosar

• saria Trichil

ilo, M , MPH Bureau o

• f

f Family H Health h – OPH PH – Louisiana D Dep ept.

• t. o
• f Hea

ealth th

18

Project Rationale

The P Probl

• blem:
• Data from multiple sources demonstrate a need for suicide prevention programs in schools and

increased focus on children’s mental and emotional health

• Legislation has recognized unexpected deaths of children as a significant public health concern

warranting review and action

• National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS)
• In 2017, we began to gather critical data on homicide, suicide and unintentional firearm

fatalities using NVDRS

• NVDRS helps state and local officials understand the circumstances contributing to violent

deaths by linking data from multiple sources including

• Medical Examiner, Coroner, law enforcement, toxicology, and vital statistics records

19

• NVDRS data show that among children 10-14 years old:
• 22% of fatal injuries are from suicide
• Suicides exceed homicides

Louisiana Youth Suicide

Louisiana suicide rates have been increasing

• Especially among youth

ages 15-19 Louisiana suicide rate in 2017 for youth 10-19 years old exceeded the US rate

• 7.8 vs. 7.2 per 100,000

0.0 .0 1.0 .0 2.0 .0 3.0 .0 4.0 .0 5.0 .0 6.0 .0 7.0 .0 8.0 .0 9.0 .0 20 2007 07 20 2008 08 20 2009 09 20 2010 10 20 2011 11 20 2012 12 20 2013 13 20 2014 14 20 2015 15 20 2016 16 20 2017 17

Louis isian ana Su a Suic icid ide Rat ate P Per 100,000 Ages 10 10-19 19

Source: Vital Records, 2007-2017

Louisiana Youth Suicide

• Among Louisiana High School

students who took the 2017 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS)

• 17.8% seriously considered

attempting suicide

• 16.8% attempted suicide
• Nationally, 7.4% of US high school

students reported attempting suicide

Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 1991-2017 High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey Data. Available at http://nccd.cdc.gov/youthonline/.

Suicide Mechanism

Source: Vital Records, 2007-2017

Between 2007 and 2017, 375 Louisiana youth age 10-19 died of suicide

• 56% from firearms
• 35% from suffocation
• 5% from self poisoning

Louisiana State Child Death Review (CDR) and Suicide Prevention Recommendations

Established in 1992, CDR aims to identify the causes of unexpected child death and methods for prevention

CDR wor

• rks t

to:

• :
• Strengthen/identify opportunities to build capacity in:
• Suicide prevention programs for children
• School-based bullying prevention programs
• Support for schools in effectively implementing suicide prevention tools and, should a

death occur, support schools in responding to the loss

• Determine if anticipatory guidance in healthcare exists when providers suspect a child is

suicidal

• Support follow up care efforts after emergency visits for suicide attempts
• Enforce suicide safety intervention plans as a standard of care for suicidal children

AIM Statement

Increase by a minimum of 1 the number of emergency departments in LDH Region 4 that are implementing universal screening for suicide risk with valid screening tools among children 10-19 years old.

Project Approach

25

Team Member Roles

26

CoLeads

• Data Team Lead, BFH
• Office of Behavioral Health Suicide

Prevention Manager

• NVDRS Coordinator, BFH
• Department of Education, Program

Manager

• ACES Coordinator, BFH
• School Based Health Team, BFH
• EMS for Children Manager

Local Partners

• Suicide Prevention Coordinator,

Family Tree Lafayette

• St. Martin Parish School System
• Regional Medical Director, OPH
• Regional MCH Coordinator, OPH
• Local Emergency Department

Physician and Pediatric Director

• Acadiana Area Human Services,

Director

• Mortality Epidemiologist
• Statewide Surveillance Manager

Team Photos

27

Impact Story

• Feedback from the local community has resulted in

shift in AIM

• Still in the 0 minus 90 day period
• Feedback from the targeted health providers has

resulted in research into practices, tools and clinical pathways

• Team participants are more familiar with the

principles of CQI, but there has not been the chance to practice these just yet given progress.

• Embarking on this work has elevated the awareness
• f child suicide within the Bureau of Family Health

Title V program and garnered increased interest in success of this collaborative.

28

Louisiana Pilot Community – Region 4

• Lafayette, LA has a strong foundation
• Suicide coalition organized by local

stakeholders

• Evidence-based screening in select schools
• Commitment from local stakeholders,

including ED healthcare personnel, to the Learning Collaborative

• Region 4 includes the parishes of Evangeline, St. Landry, Acadia, Lafayette, St.

Martin, Vermilion and Iberia

• Over the past 3 years the rate of suicide for Region 4 has been increasing for

children 10 through 19 years of age

• In 2017 the rate per 100,000 was 11 compared to the state’s rate of 8

29

Progress: Affectionately known as our “0 minus 90-Day” AIM Statement... where we are now...

30

CSLC P Progre

• gress S

Scale ale

Clinical Pathways Map

• Team and local partners got together to outline the process flow when

youth report suicidal ideation

• From school or from home
• Identified ED as a key referral location by schools and parents
• Began to map possible clinical pathway for EDs to use in conjunction

with universal screening

• See next slide

31

Screen Primary Care Provider Involvement after d/c. Evaluate Admit Discharge Home Safety Plan Post d/c Case Management Parental Education

• Safety Planning Guide :

A quick guide for

• clinicians. (WICHE)
• Look for other, simpler

guides for ED staff to use with parents/children while in ER.

• Medicaid Case Management?

(how to access, what is their role, warm handoff. Will they check in with family?

• Private insurance (BCBS and

United HC) Same questions.

• Warning Signs
• Hotline Info
• Established safety Plan, in writing and develop

with ED staff.

• School Involvement
• F/U plan: appointments, case management, etc.
• General Info for parents:

NASP Preventing Youth Suicide, Tips for Parents and Educators

• Confirm that no

consent needed.

• Have conversation

with parent while in ED, let them know that you are notifying the PMD. Screeners to consider:

• ASQ (suicide)
• PHQ-9 modified (suicide+depression)
• C-SSRS
• QPR (suicide+depression)
• Add screener to EMR

Who to screen?

• Universal vs targeted (“red flags” )
• What ages if universal screening? i.e 8/10 and older
• 8/10 + pediatric psychiatric ED patients (refer to Feb 2017 Prev Sci article)
• Role of CART
• Role of Hospital Social Worker
• Suicide Guide to ED Evaluation and Triage Suicide. (Suicide

Prevention Lifeline)

Screen positive - Yes

Actions: Research, Resources, and Needs Assessment

33

Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale

34

Option for universal screening . . .

Process Measures

35

# of schools and health care organizations that use a valid and reliable screening tool for suicide risk Decision to switch and start with health care organizations

• Still 1 school system (St. Martin Parish School Based Health Centers)

As of October 2019 - 1 Emergency Department

• Clinical champion is interested in CSLC and looking forward to meeting on

approach tools

Lessons Learned

Relevance of the philosophy of “Slow down to go fast .. .” Importance of deliberate planning, stakeholder analysis, stakeholder needs assessment, and researching best approach to meet needs Need to include the Quality Improvement professional in the CSLC improvement projects Testing interventions in systems within which the bulk of the CSLC team has no involvement requires more time. i.e. the majority of the team is considered state or local gov’t employees and not health care providers.

36

Next Steps . . .

• Start our 0-90 Day clock for original 90-day aim statement!
• Sign up hospitals
• Identify the screening tool
• Establish clinical process
• Test, Refine as needed, Spread
• Maintain team momentum
• Aspirations beyond the CSLC:
• Coordinated resources around screening between hospitals and

community service providers to address mental health of youth

• More comprehensive surveillance system of youth at risk
• Funding to be able to amplify and support this work
• Zero youth suicides!

37

Acknowledgments

Thank nk you t u to o

• ur T

r Team! Lafayett tte Area C a Cham ampion ions a s and P Partn tners

• Dr. Tina Stefanski, Debra Perna, Dr. Scott Hamilton, Marie Collins, Brad

Farmer, Brittney Williams, Adrienne Huval Louisian isiana Offic ice o

• f B

Behavio ioral al H Health:

• Danita LeBlanc

Louisian isiana Depar partm tment o t of E Educat ation ion:

• Janice Zube

Louisian isiana Offic ice o

• f P

Public ic H Health th - Burea eau o

• f F

Family ly H Healt lth

• Norah Friar, Jane Herwehe, Amanda Perry, Jia Benno, Rosaria Trichilo,

Caitlin LaVine, Nora McCarstle

38

Additional Information and Questions

39

Jane Herwehe, MPH Data Team Lead Louisiana Department of Health- Office of Public Health - Bureau of Family Health Jane.herwehe@la.gov www.partnersforfamilyhealth.org 504-568-3504 Danita LeBlanc, LCSW-BACS Suicide Prevention Coordinator Louisiana Department of Health – Office of Behavioral Health Adult, Child and Family Division Danita.leblanc@la.gov 225-342-9682

Questions?

40

Please enter your questions in the chat pod

Using Data Effectively

Maria Katradis, Ph.D. CSLC Co-Manager, Data Director

41

Data, Data, Data: What’s the Story with All that Data?

• Data help tell us the story of where we were, where we are, and where

we intend to go.

• What kinds of data do we need to tell our quality improvement story?

It It d dep epend ends o

• n w

n wher ere e we ar e are in e in our ur story.

42

Phases of Improvement

Develop

• Theory

and Prediction

Test

• Test under a

variety of conditions

Implement

• Make part
• f routine
• perations

Spread

• Sustain

and spread to other locations

43

Phases of Improvement: Collecting Data

• We may need additional types of data depending on which phase

we’re in. Our stories evolve, so can our data.

• You don’t need to be an epidemiologist or researcher to collect and

analyze data.

44

Theor eory a y and P Pred ediction ion

45

Activities

• Stakeholder Analysis
• Help identify senior

leadership and champions

• Environmental Scan
• Program Review
• Needs Assessment
• Plan-Do-Study-Act

Cycle

• Identify changes to

test

• Form strategic

partnerships and team

• Establish data

system

• Develop and/or

secure materials and equipment

• Identify and engage

pilot sites with frontline workers available to test strategies Data Collection

• Initial Stakeholder

Analysis

• Surveys
• Interview/

Discussion Notes

• State Data Review

Culling resources that you need to put together to begin testing Informing Next Steps

• Consider:
• Areas of greatest

need

• Evidence-based

and evidence- informed programs

• State support &

buy-in

• Volunteers?

Data to Submit to CSLC

• Monthly Reports
• Qualitative

Description

• Alternate

Measures

• PDSAs
• 90-day Aims
• Operationalizing

Forms

Tes est u under er a a variety o y of c condit ition ions

46

Activities

• Sequence child

safety strategies

• Test change in a

variety of locations and settings

• Small tests
• Test in parallel
• Test in

extremes

• Plan-Do-Study-

Act Cycle

• Evaluate cost

implications of implementing the strategy in sites Data Collection

• Document

learning and adaptations from tests

• Progress

Indicators identified in PDSAs

• CSLC Measures
• Ongoing

Stakeholder Analysis Informing Next Steps

• Differences
• bserved in

settings

• Adaptations/

Changes necessary for success

• Scale
• Age groups
• Demographics
• Type of Site
• Time of day, day
• f week
• In-person or

virtual

• Materials used

Data to Submit to CSLC

• Monthly Reports
• Qualitative

Description

• Quantitative

Measures

• Alternate

Measures

• PDSAs
• Adopt, Adapt, or

Abandon Change

• 90-Day Aims

Operationalizing Forms

Make e part o

• f routin

ine o

• per

eration ions

47

Activities

• Establish routine
• perations
• Develop organizational

support through policy and procedure updates

• Incorporate child safety

strategies into

• rganization’s priorities

and plans

• Update job descriptions

and roles

• Develop training for

frontline workers and new hires

• Conduct staff training
• Develop plan with sites

to leverage existing funding or pursue new funding to sustain strategies

• Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle

Data Collection

• Progress Indicators
• CSLC Measures
• Ongoing Stakeholder

Analysis Completion and periodic reviews of the Implementation Checklist (Phases of Improvement Checklist) Informing Next Steps

• Differences
• bserved in settings
• Adaptations/

Changes necessary for success

• Scale
• Age groups
• Demographics
• Type of Site

Data to Submit to CSLC

• Monthly Reports
• Qualitative

Description

• Quantitative

Measures

• Alternate Measures
• PDSAs

90-Day Aims

• Operationalizing

Forms

• Evolving Goals
• Implementation

Checklist

Activities

• Identify a spread

champion

• Engage senior

leadership support

• Establish the spread

aim

• Establish the spread

team

• Develop a Spread Plan

(use Spread Planner)

• Develop a

communications strategy and materials

• Establish a feedback

system

• Plan-Do-Study-Act

Cycle Data Collection

Spread Planner Develop a communications strategy Develop a measurement plan Progress Indicators CSLC Measures Ongoing Stakeholder Analysis

Informing Next Steps

• Differences observed in

settings

• Adaptations/ Changes

necessary for success

• Scale
• Age groups
• Demographics
• Type of Site
• Identify and work with

champions Data to Submit to CSLC

• Monthly Reports
• Qualitative

Description

• Quantitative

Measures

• Alternate Measures
• Progress Towards

Aim

• PDSAs
• Adopt, Adapt, or

Abandon Change

• 90-Day Aims

Operationalizing Forms

• Evolving Goals

Sustain and spread to other locations

48

Phases of Improvement

49

Develop

• Theory

and Prediction

Test

• Test under a

variety of conditions

Implement

• Make part
• f routine
• perations

Spread

• Sustain

and spread to other locations

Poisoning Prevention Storyboard Presentation

Janet Nelson, IA

50

Facilitator: Maria Katradis, PP Topic Lead

Iowa/Iowa Department of Public Health, Poisoning Prevention (PP)

Janet N Nelso son

Strategy Team Manager

51

52

Iowa’s Poison Prevention Team

Tam ammy N Noble, R RN, B BSN SN, CSPI CSPI Team am D Dat ata M Man anag ager Education Coordinator and Specialist in Poison Information Iowa Poison Control Center Aman anda da McCurle rley, M MSW SW Team Me Member Health Facilities Surveyor Iowa Department of Public Health Miche hele le Tilotta, M , MPA, B , BSN, R , RN Pr Proje ject Co Coordinator Substance Abuse Block Grant Manager/Synar Coordinator Iowa Department of Public Health Toby Y Yak ak, Ph PhD, M MPH PH Epide demio iologis ist Lead Epidemiologist Iowa Department of Public Health

The Poison Prevention Team also receives guidance from the State Epidemiological Workgroup and Prevention Partnership’s Advisory Council which is made up of state and local stakeholders throughout Iowa

Calls to IPCC

53

Calls to the Io

Iowa P Pois ison

• n Control Cent

nter from 2009-

2018 consistently decre

creased for information on all

substance poisonings and animal exposures, but calls for

human e an expo posure ure stayed relatively co

const stant.

Chart data provided to IDPH from Iowa Poison Control Center Opioid & Stimulant Stats 02.06.2019

Calls to Iowa Poison Control Center

54

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Total Calls to IPCC (All Substances)

Total calls Info Animal Exposure Exposure (Human)

Chart data provided to IDPH from Iowa Poison Control Center Opioid & Stimulant Stats 02.06.2019

55

Charts and data from Iowa Poison Control Center Highlights – FY 2018

Where Poisonings Occur

56

Chart and data from Iowa Poison Control Center Highlights – FY 2018

CSLC Strategy and Goals

57

Strateg egy:

• Implement and spread education (e.g., anticipatory guidance, written

materials, videos) on the services provided by poison control centers. Mea Measur ure: e:

• Number of individuals receiving education

Goal 1 l 1)

• By May 30, increase the distribution of Iowa Poison Control Center

materials by identifying gaps and establishing contacts with four new partners. Goal 2 l 2)

• By September 1, increase the distribution of Iowa Poison Control Center

materials by identifying at least one additional gap.

Poisoning Prevention Logic Model

Identify Information Distribution Gap Provide Poison Prevention Materials Poisoning Numbers Decrease

58

Gap Audience Identified

59

Women, en, Inf Infant ant’s ’s and and Chil ildren Pr en Program

• 20 Agencies
• Serving 99 Counties

Missi ssion

• To safeguard the health of low-income women, infants, and children up to age 5

who are at nutrition risk by providing nutritious foods to supplement diets, information on healthy eating, and referrals to health care. Measure e

• Number of individuals receiving Iowa Poison Control Center education

Iowa Poison

• n Control
• l Center Repor
• rt
• IPCC Education Coordinator monitors and distributes materials
• Numbers reached with speaking engagements
• Monthly distribution report

Monthly Distribution Report Summary

60

Chart from CSN CSLC Site

Impact & Lessons Learned with CSLC PP

• Increased connections
• Snowball effect
• PDSA cycle
• First timer
• Operationalize according to other’s time and resources
• Be flexible
• Commitment from Stakeholders
• People are busy
• Expand time to implement plan
• Everything takes longer

61

Next Steps

• New 90-Day Aim Statement
• Identify additional stakeholders and distribution gaps
• Next Steps to Sustain Gains
• Increase IPCC material distribution to all IDPH Prevention events
• Promote it in other departments throughout IDPH
• Add to YourLifeIowa.org resources
• Aspirations beyond the CSLC
• Continue to assist with state poison prevention strategies

62

Thank you!

Janet.Nelson@IDPH.Iowa.gov 515-725-2018

63

Questions?

64

Please enter your questions in the Q & A pod

Motor Vehicle Traffic Safety Storyboard Presentation

Will Hitchcock, WA

65

Facilitator: Jenny Stern- Carusone, MVTS Topic Lead

Washington State Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention

66

What’s at Stake

Motor Vehicle injuries continue to be one of the leading cause of unintentional injuries in the state of Washington.

• Our Aim: To achieve Target Zero for zero traffic fatalities by 2030. By

April 2023, reduce annual traffic fatalities for ages 0-19 by 7.7% annually from 51 in 2017 to 31 in 2022.

• Our goals:
• Implement and Spread CPS education to parents/caregivers

measured by number of inspections available to communities.

• Maintain training and certifications given limited resources.
• Implement and spread evidence based teen driver safety

programs to teens across the state using Impact Teen Driver curriculum

67

Theory of Change Diagram

68

Aim: Reduce annual traffic fatalities for ages 0-19 by 39% from 51 to 31 between 2017 to 2022.* Implement and Spread teen driver safety programs Track number of technicians Track and follow-up with community members receiving TOT for ITD Support and track number of ITD courses held and number of teens participating CPSTs Target Zero Managers Safe Kids Coalitions WTSC Safe Kids Worldwide WTSC Safe Kids Impact Teen Driver Org Schools Parents Teens Community Members Track number of inspection stations.

*aligns with Target Zero goals related to the 0- 19 age group proportion

Improve Driver attitudes and norms around safe driving culture CPST training to maintain and enhance skills of certified techs and educate community Track # of CPS Courses Track renewal rate.

Our Ruler

• New restraint law in effect Jan 1,

2020 – will shift focus to outreaching to daycare centers, birthing hospitals,

• etc. to increase education.
• Expectation is that by properly

educating pediatricians, birthing hospitals, daycare settings on CPS, they will convey this information to parents/caregivers.

• Measures will include number of

trainings provided outside CPST events to transporters. And number

• f orders for materials.

69

Strat ateg egy 1 1: Implement and spread child passenger safety education to parents/caregivers(e.g. how to correctly install child safety seats, buckle harness, etc.)

Strat ateg egy 3 3: Train and certify child passenger safety technicians in counties throughout the state or jurisdiction

• WA currently has 480 CPSTs

providing education to communities with effective outcomes in reducing CP serious injuries and deaths

• Seeking to maintain this number to

address attrition and manage within budget constraints

• Measures will include number of

CPSTs with active certification, recertification rate, inspections stations, certification courses.

70

Our Ruler

Strat ateg egy 5 5: Implement and spread evidence-based teen driver safety programs to teens throughout the state

• Piloted external supplemental teen driver education

with Safe Kids Chelan-Douglas implementing Teens in Cars in 2018-19.

• Partnering with the Impact Teen Drivers
• rganization to conduct a landscape assessment

across the state to determine who has been trained in curriculum and create a map of areas to target for implementation based on available trained trainers as well areas needing 'train the trainer' sessions to spread Impact Teen Drivers state wide.

• Measures will include 1# of Impact Teen Drivers

courses across the state; 2number of participants per community population; 3number of ITD courses implemented within 90 days of training completion

71

Our Ruler

Our Team

• Will Hitchcock
• Cesi Velez
• Xinyao deGrauw
• Danielle King
• Amanda Niedosmialek
• Ginny Heller
• Kannessa Thompson
• Shawneri Guzman
• Kathleen Clary-Cooke
• Katharine Flug
• WaDOH-IVP; Safe Kids Washington – Facilitator
• WTSC–Child Passenger Safety Target Zero

Manager - Co-Lead

• WaDOH – Injury Epidemiologist
• Child Care Action Council – Safe Kids Thurston
• Whitman Co. Health District – Injury prevention
• Seattle Children’s Hospital
• AMR – Safe Kids Clark
• Snohomish Co Fire – Safe Kids Snohomish
• Benton-Franklin Health District – Safe Kids

Benton-Franklin

• WaDOH - IVP

72

Where Are We Now?

• Materials for distribution of new law are in development
• Identifying key stakeholder organizations that can reach local community

agencies

• CPST trainings are being scheduled
• Planning and preparation phase for teen driving program
• Meeting with WTSC Youth Driver Manager and Impact Teen Driver
• rganization for planning
• Contacting partners to develop plan for data collection in all strategies
• Identifying base line numbers – Who is trained
• Slow moving forward due to unforeseen scheduling conflicts resulting in

some canceled meetings.

73

Where Are We Going Next?

• Facilitate and record distribution of new materials
• Track CPST trainings and certifications and report
• Implement Impact Teen Driver Support program to assist trained

trainers to connect with School Districts and help organize event through Safe Kids Coalitions and Target Zero Managers and their coalitions

• Establish PDSAs for each strategy to assist in moving forward
• Work on establishing group connectedness – to help team see

themselves as a unit rather than different pieces of the work or solution

74

Questions?

75

Please enter your questions in the chat pod

Closing and Next Steps

Jenny Stern-Carusone, MSW Children’s Safety Network, Associate Director

76

Where We Are

Learning Session 1 February 2019 Learning Session 2 October 2019 Learning Session 3 April 2020 Launch Cohort 2

Cohort 1 November 2018 through April 2020

Where We Are Going

Cohort 2 April 2020 through October 2021 Cohort 3 October 2021 through April 2023

Applications for new teams will be posted on the CSN website in January 2020. We encourage current states to share this information with peers who might want to launch a new strategy team/new topic for your state. Current teams are encouraged to continue into the next cohort. We will have a simple ‘confirmation form’ for those teams to complete towards the end of Cohort 1.

Upcoming Topic Calls and Deliverables

• November 5: Monthly Reports Due
• November topic calls:
• Poiso

isonin ing P Preventio ion: Tuesday, November 12th, 1-2 pm ET

• Bullyin

ing P Preventio ion: Thursday, November 14th, 4-5 pm ET

• Su

Suic icide de an and d Se Self-Har arm P Preventio ion: Friday, November 8th, 1-2 pm ET

• Mo

Motor V Vehi hicle T Tra raffic S Safety: Tuesday, November 19th, 1-2 pm ET

• SUID

ID P Prevention

• n: Thursday, November 21st, 1-2 pm ET
• Ongoing: Submit/Update PDSAs and 90-Aim documents
• Upload completed homework under the Submit Spread Documents

79

What Will You Do By “Next Tuesday”

This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY

Thank you!

81

Visit our website: www.ChildrensSafetyNetwork.org

Please fill out our evaluation.

To request technical assistance, please fill out our TA Request Form.

Funding Sponsor

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under the Child and Adolescent Injury and Violence Prevention Resource Centers Cooperative Agreement (U49MC28422) for $5,000,000 with 0 percent financed with non-governmental sources. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.

82