Veirs Mill Road CAC Meeting #4 September 21, 2015 Purpose of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

veirs mill road cac meeting 4 september 21 2015 purpose
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Veirs Mill Road CAC Meeting #4 September 21, 2015 Purpose of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Veirs Mill Road CAC Meeting #4 September 21, 2015 Purpose of Tonights Meeting Review Meeting #3 WMATA Q9 Lane Repurposing Analysis for Alternatives 4A and 4B Station Layout Overview 2 Lane Repurposing: Alternatives


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Veirs Mill Road CAC Meeting #4 September 21, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Purpose of Tonight’s Meeting

  • Review Meeting #3
  • WMATA Q9
  • Lane Repurposing Analysis for Alternatives 4A and 4B
  • Station Layout Overview
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Lane Repurposing: Alternatives 4A and 4B

  • Service: New BRT service
  • Runningway:
  • Provide dedicated lanes by repurposing existing lanes or shoulders:

  • Alt. 4A: BRT in median-running lanes

  • Alt. 4B: BRT in curb-running lanes
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Alternative 4A – Median Lanes

  • BRT buses would use the “Bus Only” lane
  • Local buses would use the curb lane
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Alternative 4B – Curb Lanes

  • BRT and local buses would share the curb lane
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Lane Repurposing: Alternatives 4A and 4B

  • Provides dedicated lanes for 85% of the corridor
  • Preliminary traffic analysis indicated degradation of traffic conditions
  • Further analysis was completed to determine merit of these Alternatives
  • Person throughput analysis (moving people, not cars)
  • How would traffic re-route if lanes are repurposed along Veirs Mill Road?
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Lane Repurposing: Methodology

  • Analysis based on technical guidance in the Montgomery County Transit

Lane Repurposing Study

  • Compare the transit ridership to the general purpose lane person

throughput for various segments

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Lane Repurposing: Conclusions

  • 2040 Transit Ridership is not projected to be greater than the general

purpose lane person throughput

  • There are no major parallel roadways along MD 586 that could be used as

easy diversion routes

  • Alternatives 4A and 4B are not retained for detailed study
  • HOWEVER, while lane repurposing is not viable along the entire corridor,

there could be shorter segments where lane repurposing makes sense. Lane repurposing will be considered in developing the alignments of the Alternatives Retained for Detailed Study (ARDS)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

UPDATED: Alternatives Retained for Detailed Study (ARDS)

  • These alternatives were retained:
  • Alternative 1: No-Build
  • Alternative 2: Enhanced bus service with queue jumps
  • Alternative 3: New BRT service in dedicated curb lanes and mixed traffic
  • Alternative 5B: New BRT service in bi-directional median lane (or two median lanes

where feasible)

  • These alternatives were not retained:
  • Alternative 4A: New BRT service in dedicated repurposed median lanes
  • Alternative 4B: New BRT service in dedicated repurposed curb lanes
  • Alternative 4C: New BRT service in dedicated additional median lanes
  • Alternative 4D: New BRT service in dedicated additional curb lanes
  • Alternative 5A: New BRT service in dedicated reversible median lane (mixed traffic in
  • ff-peak)
  • Alternative 6: New BRT service in dedicated curb lanes and mixed traffic
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Purpose of Tonight’s Meeting

  • Review Meeting #3
  • WMATA Q9
  • Lane Repurposing Analysis for Alternatives 4A and 4B
  • Station Layout Overview
slide-11
SLIDE 11

STATION LAYOUT OVERVIEW

  • Areas around the station
  • At the station

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

AREAS AROUND THE STATION

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

AREAS AROUND THE STATION SYSTEM ELEMENTS TO CONSIDER

  • Curbs and crossings
  • Lighting
  • Street furniture
  • Wayfinding
  • Artwork
  • Sustainability

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CURBS AND CROSSINGS

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

LIGHTING

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

STREET FURNITURE

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

WAYFINDING

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

ARTWORK

18

Highlandtown, MD Cleveland, OH Sunderland, UK

slide-19
SLIDE 19

SUSTAINABILITY

  • Increase green space
  • Green roofs
  • Trees and landscaping
  • Small parks
  • Public art
  • Utilize clean energy
  • Recycled materials
  • Solar power
  • Regenerative breaking technology
  • LED lighting
  • Integrate stormwater management
  • Bio-swales and slopes
  • Constructed wetlands
  • Porous/pervious pavements

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

THE STATION

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

PLATFORM TYPES

  • Median Side/Center Platform
  • Height: 14” height (level with low floor car)
  • Length: 120’
  • Width: 12’-13’
  • Requires bus with left and right side doors
  • Curb Lane Side Platform
  • Height: 14” height (level with low floor car)
  • Length: 60’ - 120’
  • Width: 10’
  • Requires bus with right side door; potential to accept local bus

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

MEDIAN SIDE PLATFORM

22

Dedicated bus lanes running in the median.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

MEDIAN SIDE PLATFORM ACCESS

slide-24
SLIDE 24

MEDIAN CENTER PLATFORM

24

Dedicated bus lanes running in the median.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

MEDIAN CENTER PLATFORM ACCESS

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

CURB LANE SIDE PLATFORM

26

Shared lanes or dedicated bus lanes running along the curb. Service lanes run along the main road throughout the corridor.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

CURB LANE SIDE PLATFORM ACCESS

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

ELEMENTS ON THE PLATFORM

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

AT THE STATION SYSTEM ELEMENTS TO CONSIDER

  • Canopy/shelter
  • Seating
  • Lighting
  • Branding
  • Information signage
  • Trash/recycling receptacles
  • Security cameras
  • Fare machines
  • Landscaping
  • Artwork
  • Surface treatment
  • Stormwater management/sustainability

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

CANOPY/SHELTER

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

SEATING

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

LIGHTING

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

BRANDING

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

INFORMATION SIGNAGE

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

TRASH/RECYCLING RECEPTACLES

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

SECURITY

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

FARE MACHINES

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

LANDSCAPING

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

ARTWORK

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

SURFACE TREATMENT

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT/ SUSTAINABLITY

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

QUESTIONS?

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

Conclusion

Meeting #5: November (date TBD) Topic for Meeting #5: Alternatives Retained for Detailed Study (ARDS) Presentation and Discussion

Reference information can be found on the SHA website: http://apps.roads.maryland.gov/WebProjectLifeCycle/ProjectDocuments.aspx?projectno=MO 2441115