Inverse Heat Conduction Problem using TC deconvolution and IR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

inverse heat conduction problem using tc deconvolution
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Inverse Heat Conduction Problem using TC deconvolution and IR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Inverse Heat Conduction Problem using TC deconvolution and IR measurements: Application to heat flux estimation in a Tokamak Application to heat flux estimation in a Tokamak JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar IUSTI Laboratory Provence University JL.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Inverse Heat Conduction Problem using TC deconvolution and IR measurements: Application to heat flux estimation in a Tokamak

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

1

Application to heat flux estimation in a Tokamak

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

IUSTI Laboratory Provence University

Tutorial 11

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Summarize

  • 1. Experimental Set-Up Problematic
  • 2. Description of the method

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

2

Application to a 1D Inverse Heat Conduction Problem

  • 3. Application to a 2D experimental case

(If we have time)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Plasma at T ~ 100 millions of degrés

The tokamaks…

The confinement is insuring with 2 magnetic fields : – an axial field produced with the toroidal coils – a poloidal field created with the plasma current

Lawson Critera: (Density) x (T°) x (Confinement Time) > 1021 KeV.s.m-3

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

3

– a poloidal field created with the plasma current The resulting magnetic fields are helicoïdal

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Plasma Wall Interaction: Heat flux of about 10MW/m2

Limiteur Divertor

DSMF : Dernière surface magnétique fermée (Last Closed Magnetic Surface) SOL : Scrape off layer

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

4

Heat flux of about 10MW/m2 Heat flux intercepted by the Plasma Facing Component Tore Supra (TS)

Cadarache (France)

Joint European Torus (JET)

Culham (UK)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

r(m) 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0

  • 1.3
  • 1.4
  • 1.5
  • 1.6
  • 1.7
  • 1.8

Z(m)

lignes de champ magnétiques

TC TC côté intérieur côté extérieur

r(m) 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0

  • 1.3
  • 1.4
  • 1.5
  • 1.6
  • 1.7
  • 1.8

Z(m)

lignes de champ magnétiques

TC TC côté intérieur côté extérieur

Divertor de JET

Type K Facq = 20Hz

  • 1.3
  • 1.4
  • 1.5
  • 1.6
  • 1.7
  • 1.8

Z(m)

lignes de champ magnétiques

TC TC côté intérieur côté extérieur

  • 1.3
  • 1.4
  • 1.5
  • 1.6
  • 1.7
  • 1.8

Z(m)

lignes de champ magnétiques

TC TC côté intérieur côté extérieur

JET Divertor

Resolution ~ 8-10mm Spectral Range: [3-5 µm] Facquisition = 50 Hz Observation of each Divertor’Side

JET : Diagnostics and Components

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

5

r(m) 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0

  • 1.8

r(m) 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0

  • 1.8
  • °

300 200 100

  • [Gautier, EPS 1997]
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Example of Experimental Temperatures

IR data T (°C) x time (s)

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

6

T ( TC (1 cm) time (s)

500 400 300 200 100

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Objectives : Heat flux computation on the plasma facing components Why ?

  • Critical Heat Flux and temperature of the PFC (10 MW/m², 1200 °

° ° °C)

  • Components destruction
  • Water leak in water-cooled machines

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

7

  • Water leak in water-cooled machines
  • Better understanding of the plasma physic.

Problem

  • Is the plasma component perfectly known ?
  • Dimensions
  • Thermal properties
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Problems

  • IR data: - Direct computation (surface temperature measurement)
  • Unknown Thermal Properties
  • TC data: - Spatial resolution

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

8

  • TC data: - Spatial resolution
  • Inverse Problem

We have to use the thermocouple data => Solve an inverse Problem

slide-9
SLIDE 9

A simplified version of our problem : 1D, Linear,Semi-Infinite Wall

k = 1 W/mK Cp = 1000 J/kg.m3 ρ = 2500 kg/m3 z

Direct Problem

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

9

Temperature + Noise Direct Problem It’s possible to have the temperature field T(z,t) using:

  • Numerical Simulation
  • Analytic Solution
  • Semi-Analytic Solution
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Knowing the thermal properties, is it possible to estimate the heat flux with a temperature measurement ? k = 1 W/mK Cp = 1000 J/kg.m3 ρ= 2500 kg/m3

+

z

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

10

e

=> Q(t) ???

Inverse Problem

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Convolution / Deconvolution Linear Syst. e(t) s(t) INPUT OUTPUT

∫ ∫ ∫ ∫

− − − − + + + + = = = = ⊗ ⊗ ⊗ ⊗ + + + + = = = =

t

d t i e t s t i t e t s t s ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( τ τ τ

Theory of the Linear System

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

11

∫ ∫ ∫ ∫

− − − − + + + + = = = = ⊗ ⊗ ⊗ ⊗ + + + + = = = = d t i e t s t i t e t s t s ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( τ τ τ

q(t) ? T(t)

i(t) = Impulse response of the System

) (t δ

t Linear Syst.

i(t)

z

slide-12
SLIDE 12

∫ ∫ ∫ ∫

− − − − = = = = ⊗ ⊗ ⊗ ⊗ = = = = − − − −

t

d t i Q t i t Q T t T ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( τ τ τ

τ τ τ ∆ − − + − ≈ ∂ − ∂ = − ) ( ) 1 ( ) ( ) ( f F u f F u t t u t i ) (t u

) (t H

t

Convolution / Deconvolution

  • Step Response:
  • Duhamel’Theorem:

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

12

∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑

= = = = − − − − = = = =

= = = = − − − − − − − − + + + + − − − − = = = = − − − − = = = =

F f f F F f F F

f q u f q f F u f F u T T T

1 1

) ( ) ( )) ( ) 1 ( ( ∆ ∆

  • Discretization:

τ ∆ ∂t u(t) = Step Response of the System (response to the Heaviside Function)

System

F = Number of step time

slide-13
SLIDE 13

                                        ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ =                     ∆ ∆ ∆

− − F F F F

q q q u u u u u u T T T

  • 2

1 2 1 1 2 1

. . . . . .

F

F = Number of step time

X

Convolution

T

Q

=

×

3 1 2 2 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 1

. . u q u q u q T T u q u q T T u q T T ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ + + + + + + + + = = = = − − − − + + + + = = = = − − − − = = = = − − − −

1 ) ( ) 1 ( − − − − ≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ − − − − + + + + = = = = F k k u k u uk ∆

∑ ∑ ∑ ∑

= = = = − − − −

= = = =

F f f F F

f q u T

1

) ( ∆ ∆

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

13

T X Q .

1 − − − −

= = = =

Deconvolution

X

T

Q

=

×

3 3 2 2 1 1

....... . u q u q u q u q T T

F F F F F

∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + = = = = − − − −

− − − − − − − − − − − −

The matrix X can be inverted if X is well conditioned

1

) (

= X X X K

If K(X) is low => X is well conditioned If K(X) >> 1 => X is ill conditioned

slide-14
SLIDE 14

k = 1 W/mK Cp = 1000 J/kg.m3 ρ= 2500 kg/m3 e

+

z

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

14

                                                − − − −                         − − − − = = = = ατ ατ π ατ π τ τ 2 2 4 ² exp 2 ) , ( x erfc x x b q x T

  • Step response computation: analytical solution
  • The temperatures are produced with a FEM code

We can solve this problem with Excel or Matlab

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Deconvolution of the temperature at z=5mm: Application with Excel and Matlab

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Why doesn’t it work ?

=> The matrix is ill conditioned because the problem is ill posed => The solution doesn’t respect the Stability condition: Q is very sensitive to measurement errors contained in deltaT.

T X Q .

1 −

=

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

16

  • How to find a solution ?

=> Need to use a regularization procedure => Regularization with a penalisation => We choose the Tikhonov operator

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Q I T Q X R X J ~ . ~ . ) , , (

2

γ γ + + + + − − − − = = = =

  • Without regularization, the function to minimize is:

J is the function to minimise R is the regularization operator γ is the regularization parameter

Q ~

2

~ . ) , , ( T Q X R X J − − − − = = = = γ

  • With regularization, the new J is:

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

17

( ( ( ( ) ) ) )

T X X X Q . ~

1 t t t

I I

− − − −

+ + + + = = = = γ

  • In our case, we want to limit the norm of , so R=I, this is a 0
  • rder regularization.
  • One can note that is not the exact heat flux but an estimated

heat flux; it is a biased value of Q

  • To minimise J is equivalent to have the following expression of Q

Q ~ Q ~

slide-18
SLIDE 18

How to choose γ ? => γ is chosen to have the best compromise between an exact solution and a stable solution => Exact solution means that => Stable means that

~ . → → → → − − − − T Q X min ~ → → → → Q

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Application to the tiles of the JET Divertor x

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

19

500 400 300 200 100

IR data T (°C) TC (1 cm) time (s) time (s)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Deduced from Other Diag. To compute with the TC data

  • Assuming that the heat spatial shape is not depending on timed.

Q(x,t) = f(x) . g(t)

  • Computation of the step response 2D for z=10mm, x=55mm

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

20

  • Computation of the step response 2D for z=10mm, x=55mm

and a spatial shape deduced from the IR data. ⇒ FEM code ⇒ Semi-analytical method

  • Construction of X
  • Construction of (XTX + γI)
  • Inversion of (XTX + γI)

u(x,z,t)

Step response at the TC location ) (t H

t

x z

uTC(t)

) (x f

x

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Outer Side Erosion Zone

With IR

Inner Side Carbon Layer

With IR With TC

Without layer modelling

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

21

  • Zone with deposit: Flux IR ≠

≠ ≠ ≠ Flux TC

  • Informations on the deposit ?

With IR With TC With TC

slide-22
SLIDE 22

CFC RTC Carbon Deposit

  • 4 deposit param. : ad, λd, ed, Rc

Sensitive Analysis:

k k k

t Q t Z β β β ∂ ∂ = ) , ( ) (

TC IR

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

22

  • Identif. Of 1 parameter : Req

Req= 3.10-4 m²K/W

(heq = 3.3 kW/m²K)

  • Very low sensitivity at the TC location
  • Sensitive and correlated in surface

=> Impossible to identify 4 parameters

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Conclusion

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

                        = = = = ατ τ τ 2 2 ) , ( x ierfc b q x T                                                 − − − −                         − − − − = = = = ατ ατ π ατ π τ τ 2 2 4 ² exp 2 ) , ( x erfc x x b q x T

METTI-2011

  • JL. Gardarein, J. Gaspar

24