Valua%on of University Startups Panel Discussion with: Moderator: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

valua on of university startups
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Valua%on of University Startups Panel Discussion with: Moderator: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Valua%on of University Startups Panel Discussion with: Moderator: Bob Hisrich, PhD, Kent State University Helena Wisniewski, PhD, University of Alaska, Anchorage Gary Gibbons, PhD Thunderbird School of Global Management Steve


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Valua%on of University Startups

Panel Discussion with:

  • Moderator: Bob Hisrich, PhD, Kent State University
  • Helena Wisniewski, PhD, University of Alaska, Anchorage
  • Gary Gibbons, PhD Thunderbird School of Global Management
  • Steve Roberts, Kent State University

Director, Technology CommercializaHon April 18, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Valuing University Startup Companies

  • Three accepted valuaHon methods-
  • Market Approach. Look at similar transacHons in open markets.
  • Cost Approach. Determine the value by calculaHng the amount of money required to

recreate the property.

  • Income Approach. How much income can this company generate over the life of the

company? In theory, this is far and away the best method.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Valuing Startup Companies- Pre-Revenue

  • It’s Hard!
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Valuing Startup Companies- The Balance Sheet

  • Balance Sheet
  • Assets-
  • License or opHon to license university technology (usually untested technology)
  • Smart people with a Story (probably the source of any real value)
  • Friends and family
  • Some local or university entrepreneurial ecosystem
  • LiabiliHes-
  • LiZle or no cash or access to capital
  • LiZle or no management experience
  • Limited understanding of the market
  • Regulatory hurdles
  • Lots of mouths to feed
  • Angry and aggressive compeHtors
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Valuing Startup Companies- Beware of Hockey S%cks

Spending a $1 for Every $1 of Revenue- Not a recipe for success

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Valuing Startup Companies- Why it is important to get the value correct

  • If the seed-stage valuaHon is too high…
  • The financial contribuHon is undervalued and too liZle stock received by

investors

  • Easier for smart money to walk away
  • Seed rounds Hming can be significantly extended and a higher likelihood of a

down round later

  • Problems if the company misses an important milestone
  • If the seed-stage valuaHon is too low…
  • Entrepreneurs are less moHvated
  • Increased diluHon aaer mulHple rounds of funding
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Valuing Pre-Revenue Startup Companies- 3 handy methods

  • Venture Capital Method
  • Scorecard Method
  • Berkus Method
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Valuing Startup Companies- Venture Capital Method

  • Post-money ValuaHon = Terminal Value ÷ AnHcipated ROI
  • Where- Terminal Value is anHcipated selling price of the company in 5 to 8 years
  • AnHcipated ROI 10 to 30X
  • Example- company needs $1 million cash and expected to sell for $50 million. Investors

demand 20 % ROI $50,000,000 20 = $2,500,000. Less $1 million investment = $1.5 million Pre-money valuaHon.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Valuing Startup Companies- Scorecard Method

Criteria Weigh*ng Comparison Adjusted Weigh*ng Entrepreneur, Team, Board 30% Size of Opportunity 25% Product/Technology 15% Compe**ve Environment 10% Sales/Marke*ng 10% Need for More Financing 5% Other 5%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Valua%on of Startup Companies- Berkus Method

For a “perfect” idea, possibility of $2 to $2.5 million pre-money enterprise valuaHon