UWMs Early Warning System Rita Cheng Provost and Vice Chancellor - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

uwm s early warning system
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

UWMs Early Warning System Rita Cheng Provost and Vice Chancellor - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

UWMs Early Warning System Rita Cheng Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Goals Using a web-based Early Warning System report, all instructors of standard start- date sections with new


slide-1
SLIDE 1

UWM’s Early Warning System

Rita Cheng Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

slide-2
SLIDE 2

A2S Goals

Using a web-based Early Warning System report, all instructors of standard start- date sections with new freshmen will assess the 4-week status of their new

  • freshmen. Advisors will contact students

reported as doing unsatisfactory work and report by the eighth week back to instructors their recommendations to students.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

A2S Baseline Data

2nd Year Retention Rates UWM 2003 New Freshmen

63.1% 77.2% 48.9% 73.5% 75.8% 66.2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% All Students Students requiring no remedial education Students requiring both math and English remediation

Students of Color White

slide-4
SLIDE 4

A2S Targeted Improvements

Increase first year retention rate Decrease in number of students

  • n probation after first semester

Increase course completion rate Increase six-year graduation rate

slide-5
SLIDE 5

A2S

Actions in 2005-06

Conceptualized, designed and

developed Early Warning System accessed through PAWS Peoplesoft Student Administration System

slide-6
SLIDE 6

A2S

Actions in 2005-06

Center for Instructional & Professional

Development (CIPD) wrote up strategies for gathering information about student learning that would make feedback more

  • informed. See

http: / / www.uwm.edu/ Dept/ CIPD

Evaluated results and gathered feedback

as basis for system improvements (implemented Spring 2006)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

A2S Impact

34% of instructors submitted

feedback using the Early Warning tool

Feedback submitted for students in

507 classes

slide-8
SLIDE 8

A2S Impact

8074 total assessments entered in

Early Warning System (reached 90%

  • f freshman class)

25.2% (977) of new freshmen

received at least one unsatisfactory assessment

56% of advisors provided feedback

slide-9
SLIDE 9

A2S Impact

Students who have contact with

advisors through the Early Warning System have improved rates of retention (2-6% depending on type

  • f remediation needed)

Number of unsatisfactory Early

Warning reports related to students’ likelihood of being on probation

slide-10
SLIDE 10

A2S Impact

Demonstrates that identification of

unsatisfactory performance by an instructor at the four-week mark is a true indicator of that student being “at risk” academically

Data underscore the need for

continuing early intervention with these students

slide-11
SLIDE 11

A2S Plans for 2006-07

Increase participation by faculty and

advisors

Further analysis of factors leading to

student success