Utilization o on of Epidur dural Steroid I d Injec ections ns - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

utilization o on of epidur dural steroid i d injec
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Utilization o on of Epidur dural Steroid I d Injec ections ns - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Utilization o on of Epidur dural Steroid I d Injec ections ns Di Cui MD Emory Spine Center Utilization and trends Primary Purpose is to decrease pain and improve function Complements other conservative options May help some


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Utilization o

  • n of Epidur

dural Steroid I d Injec ections ns

Di Cui MD Emory Spine Center

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Utilization and trends

  • Primary Purpose is to decrease pain and

improve function

  • Complements other conservative options
  • May help some patients avoid surgery
  • Buying patient time for preparation for

surgery

  • Alternative for patient who are not

surgical candidates

  • Utilization decreasing since 2009  More

selective?

Pain Physician 2017; 20:551-567

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Indications

  • Pain from nerve compression
  • Spinal stenosis
  • Disc herniation
  • Pain with likely inflammatory

basis

  • Favorable natural history for

disc herniation

  • Not so much for spinal

stenosis….

I II III IV

Favorable Response (at least 50% pain relief) - Pain Med 2011; 12:871-879

75% 25%

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Mechanism

  • Local Anesthetics
  • Sympathetic blockade  Vasodilation  Improved blood flow to nerves
  • Nociceptive C-fiber Blockade  Decrease Central sensitization
  • Steroids
  • Inhibition of phospholipid arachidonic acid and reduce inflammation
  • Decrease Inflammation locally of injured nerves
  • No inferiority of non-particular steroids vs particular steroids
  • Epidural injection shown to be superior than oral or IM steroids
  • Spine. 2007; 32(16): 1754-60. Can J Anesth. 2010l 67: 694-703.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Techniques

  • Interlaminar
  • Midline
  • Paramidline
  • Transforaminal

Interlaminar Transforaminal

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Epidural in Spinal stenosis

  • Epidural Injection For Spinal Stenosis
  • 16 site multicenter RCT, 400 patient randomized
  • Central lumbar canal stenosis with pain worse in buttock/leg than low back
  • Interlaminar vs transforaminal
  • Could repeat at 3 weeks, May cross-over at 6 weeks.
  • Primary outcome
  • RMDQ at 6 weeks
  • 1 week pain Average Pain at 6 weeks
  • Secondary outcome
  • > 30% relief at 6 weeks
  • > 50% relief at 6 weeks

NEJM 2014: 371(1): 11-21

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Epidural in Spinal Stenosis

  • Both lidocaine only injection and steroid injection showed good relief
  • Approx. 50 % of patients received at least 30% relief at 6 weeks
  • Approx. 40% of patient received at least 50% relief at 6 weeks
  • Average pain level went from 7 to 5
  • Patient who received steroids reports to be more satisfied with their

relief.

  • 67% vs 54%
  • Patient with lidocaine only had a higher cross-over rate compared to

group receiving steroid

  • 45% vs 30%

NEJM 2014: 371(1): 11-21

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Epidural injection and Disc Herniation

  • TFESI for radicular pain due to disc herniation at L4-5, L5-S1 or S1 NF
  • 2024 subjects
  • Follow up at 2 months
  • 70% of patients achieved 50% relief at 2 months
  • Up to 40% of patients had relief that lasted 12 months

Pain Medicine 2013, 13: 1126-1133

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Long term effect of Epidural injection

RCT suggests surgical sparing effect of TFESIs

  • RCT of 55 patients that were operative candidates for nerve root

decompression.

  • Transforaminal epidural injections done with bupivicaine vs. bupivicaine

w/betamethasone

  • 28 received bupivicaine w/betamethasone; 21/28 did not proceed with
  • perative tx at 28 months out
  • 27 received bupivicaine only; 9/27 opted not to proceed with operative tx at

28 months

  • 5 year f/u study after this showed that majority still had not undergone

surgery

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2000, 82-A(11): 1589-93.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Risks

  • 16638 consecutive epidural injection (Pain Med. 2014; 15, 1436-1446)
  • Mayo Clinic, Northwestern and University of Pennsylvania
  • No permanent neurologic injuries reported
  • Compared to
  • >100,000 NSAIDS related hospitalization/year (AmJ Ther 2000; 7: 115-121)
  • 14800 opioid related death in US in a year (CDC, MMWR 2011; 60: 1-6)
  • Fungal Meningitis Outbreak in 2012
  • Isolated care reports of spinal and brain infarcts
  • Most involve particulate steroids
  • At least 1 involving non-particulate steroids
slide-11
SLIDE 11

The limitations

  • Criticism over long term efficacy of epidural injection
  • Concern about safety
  • Timing of injections and number of injections
  • Better evidence for radicular pain from disc herniation compared to

central canal stenosis

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Where does Epidural injection stand?

Low High

Safety

Low High

Cost

Low High

Efficacy

Low High

Ease of Admin

Low High

Availability

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Thank you