Using the best science to guide our practice PROVIDER TRAINING 2011 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
using the best science to guide our practice provider
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Using the best science to guide our practice PROVIDER TRAINING 2011 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jan 08, 2023 588 likes •965 views

Using the best science to guide our practice PROVIDER TRAINING 2011 Statement of Purpose We dedicate ourselves to working in partnership to enhance the capacity of Pennsylvanias juvenile justice system to achieve its balanced and

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Using the best science to guide our practice PROVIDER TRAINING

2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Statement of Purpose

We dedicate ourselves to working in partnership to enhance the capacity of Pennsylvania’s juvenile justice system to achieve its balanced and restorative justice mission by:

Employing evidence-based practices, with fidelity, at every stage of

the juvenile justice process;

Collecting and analyzing the data necessary to measure the results

  • f these efforts; and, with this knowledge,

Striving to continuously improve the quality of our decisions,

services and programs.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Balanced and Restorative Justice represents the foundational principles upon which our juvenile justice system is built

  • Community protection
  • Accountability to victims and community
  • Competency development

Our juvenile justice system enhancement strategy will enhance our collective capacity to achieve our balanced and restorative justice goals

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Screening & Assessment

YLS/CMI Case Planning MAYSI~2 Detention Assessment Instrument Alternatives to Detention Diversion

Quality Supervision & Practices

Family Involvement Evidence-based Probation Practices Motivational Interviewing Graduated Responses Disproportionate Minority Contact PACTT Alliance Aftercare

Provider Services

Evidence-Based Programs EPISCenter Quality Improvement Initiative Evidence-Based Toolkit

Data Analysis & Research

Quality Data Identify Measures

  • f Success

Data Analysis Data Informed Policy & Programs Research

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Stage Four Refinement Stage Three Behavioral Change Stage Two Initiation

Proficiency

Motivational Interviewing Structured Decision Making

  • YLS Risk/Need Assessment
  • MAYSI Screen
  • Detention Assessment
  • Inter-rater Reliability

Case Plan Development Data Driven Decisions Policy Alignment Scorecard EBP Service Contracts Skill Building and Tools Cognitive Behavioral Programming Service Provider Alignment

  • Standardized Program Evaluation

Protocol Evidence-based Prevention and Intervention Services Center Responsivity Tools Graduated Responses

Stage One Readiness

Intro To EBP Training Organizational Readiness Cost Analysis Stakeholder Involvement

Family Involvement Data Analysis Continuous Quality Improvement

Delinquency Prevention Diversion

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • A comprehensive strategy

for evidence-based reform

  • Berks County was selected as
  • ne of four sites nationally
  • PA team is comprised of

county and state officials and practitioners Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP)

Type of Program Amount of Treatment Quality of Treatment Youth Risk Level

Juvenile Justice System Improvement Project Center for Juvenile Justice Reform @ Georgetown University

slide-8
SLIDE 8

 Based on over thirty years of

research

 Well –designed programs that

meet certain conditions can reduce recidivism.

 Based on three principles

slide-9
SLIDE 9

isk eed esponsivity

slide-10
SLIDE 10

 1st Principle is the RISK principle or

the Who to target

 Do not place low risk offenders with

high risk offenders.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

 2nd Principle is the NEED

principle or the What to target

slide-12
SLIDE 12

3rd Principle is the TREATMENT principle, or the How

The methods programs will use to target RISKS AND NEEDS

Most effective programs are behavioral in nature

The most effective interventions are behavioral:

 Focus on current factors that influence behavior  Action oriented- do something other than talk  Offender behavior is appropriately reinforced

slide-13
SLIDE 13

 Fidelity Principle – implement

program as designed

slide-14
SLIDE 14

 Identifies what modes and styles of

services are appropriate for

  • ffenders.

 Includes protective or strength

factors to help moderate risk factors.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Purpose

 The instrument is designed to assist the professional

worker in the collection and synthesis of risk, need and responsivity information and the linking of that information with case planning. It is not designed to replace professional judgments or to dictate decisions.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Top Four + 1 Criminogenic Needs Additional Criminogenic Needs Non-Criminogenic needs

  • 1. Prior and current
  • ffenses

6. 1. 2. 7. 2. 3. 8. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

 Prior and current offenses  Attitudes/Orientation (moral reasoning )  Peer Relations (prosocial skills )  Personality/Behavior  Family Circumstances/Parenting  Substance Abuse  Education/ Employment (academic

skills/workforce development)

 Leisure/Recreation & Community Engagement

(prosocial skills)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

 Current and prior offenses  Attitudes/Orientation  Personality/Behavior  Peer Relations  Family circumstances

slide-19
SLIDE 19

 Static risk factor  Not changeable  Past behavior is a powerful predictor of future

behavior

slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

 It is NOT prescriptive in terms of

service delivery

 It is NOT a mental health assessment  It will NOT cover needs that are

unrelated to future offending

 It is NOT a diagnostic tool

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • 0.05

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 Les than half criminogenic Fifty % or more criminogenic

Reduction In recidivism

Increase in

recidivism

Source: Dowden and Andrews (1999). What Works in Youthful Offender Treatment. Forum on Correctional Research

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

6 5 4 3 2 1

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Source: Andrews, D. A., Dowden, C., & Gendreau, P. (1999). Clinically relevant and psychologically informed app roaches to reduced reoffending: A meta-analytic study of human service, risk, need, responsivity, and other concerns in justice contexts. Unpublished manuscript. Ottawa, ON: Carleton University; Dowden, C. (1998). A meta-analytic examination of the risk, need and responsivity principles and their importance within the rehabilitation debate. Unpublished master's thesis, Ottawa, ON: Carleton University, Department of Psychology.

Better

  • utcomes

Poorer

  • utcomes

More criminogenic than non- criminogenic needs More non- criminogenic than criminogenic needs

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Needs Targeted & Correlation with Effect Size for Youthful Offenders

Source: Dowden and Andrews, (1999). What Works in Young Offender Treatment: A Meta Analysis. Forum on Correctional Research. Correctional Services of Canada

Fear of Punishment Bond Anti Social Peers Target Self-Esteem Vague Emotional Problems Respect Anti Social Thinking Physical Activity Criminogenic Needs

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

  • 0.1
  • 0.2

Effect Size

  • 0.18
  • 0.12
  • 0.09
  • 0.06
  • 0.05
  • 0.03

0.36 Reduced Recidivism Increased Recidivism

slide-32
SLIDE 32

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Poor Match Med Match Good Match

Risk/Need

slide-33
SLIDE 33

 YLS counties to provide YLS results

and/or case plan

 YLS used to assist with ISP or other

service development

 Expectation: interventions will be

individualized based on the identified criminogenic risk/need areas

slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36

 Dan Rhoads c-darhoads@state.pa.us