US 30 (Baseline Road) IL 47 to IL 31 Community Advisory Group - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
us 30 baseline road
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

US 30 (Baseline Road) IL 47 to IL 31 Community Advisory Group - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 22, 2022 379 likes •766 views

US 30 (Baseline Road) IL 47 to IL 31 Community Advisory Group Meeting November 1, 2012 Meeting Agenda Introductions/Project Roles Purpose of Meeting Project Overview CSS Process PIM Overview & Feedback CAG Ground

slide-1
SLIDE 1

US 30 (Baseline Road) IL 47 to IL 31 Community Advisory Group Meeting November 1, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Introductions/Project Roles
  • Purpose of Meeting
  • Project Overview
  • CSS Process
  • PIM Overview & Feedback
  • CAG Ground Rules
  • Transportation Needs Identified to Date
  • Group Exercise – Identifying and Prioritizing Transportation

Issues

  • Next Steps

Meeting Agenda

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction/Project Roles

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • IDOT District 1 (Kimberly Murphy, Consultant

Studies Unit Head)

  • Study consultant team

– Prime Consultant: Hutchison Engineering – Sub-Consultants

  • CH2M HILL: Environmental Studies, Public Involvement
  • Lin Engineering: Drainage and Hydraulic Studies
  • EFK Moen: Crash Analysis and Traffic Management Plan

Study Team Roles

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Meet with IDOT throughout the study process
  • Provide input to the project
  • Assist in the development of project

alternatives

  • Serve as conduit for communication between

project team and other stakeholders

  • Provide insight and communicate issues
  • Participate in the public involvement program

CAG Role

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CAG Membership

  • Steve Coffinbargar – Kane County
  • Scott Koster – Kendall County
  • Jeff Palmquist – Fox Valley Park District
  • Minga Plata – Bristol Township
  • Mike Pubentz – Village of Montgomery
  • Brad Sanderson – Village of Yorkville
  • Laura Schraw – Village of Yorkville
  • Mike Sullivan – Kane/Kendall Council of Mayors
  • Gregory Thomas – Aurora Police Department
  • Jan Ward – Kane County
  • Peter Wallers – Village of Montgomery
  • Daniel Meyers – Montgomery Fire Department
  • Jerad Chipman – Village of Montgomery
  • Jeff Zoephel – Village of Montgomery
  • Alec Keenum – Oswego Fire Protection District

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CAG Ground Rules & Guidelines

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Draft Ground Rules – Per CSS Policy

1. Input on the project from all stakeholders is duly considered in

  • rder to yield the best solutions to problems identified by the

process. 2. Input from all participants in the process is valued and considered. 3. The list of stakeholders is subject to revisions/additions at any time as events warrant. 4. All participants must keep and open mid and participate openly, honestly, and respectfully. 5. All participants should work collaboratively and cooperatively to provide input toward developing a solution.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Draft Ground Rules – Per CSS Policy

6. All participants in the process must treat each other with respect and dignity. 7. The project must progress at a reasonable pace, based on the project schedule. 8. CAG members should commit to attend all CAG meetings. 9. Members of the media and general public are welcome in all stakeholder meetings, but must remain in the role of

  • bservers, not participants in the process.
  • 10. Final project decisions will be made by IDOT and FHWA. Input

is sought from CAG members prior to major milestone decisions.

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Provide an overview of the project objectives,

process, and schedule

  • Explain your roles and responsibilities as part of the

CAG

  • Get your input on current conditions and potential

project issues

  • Summarize Public Meeting #1
  • Explain opportunities for continued involvement in

the project

  • Summarize next steps

Purpose of Today’s Meeting

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Project Overview

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Study Location Map

US Route 30 (Baseline Road) Illinois Route 47

Kane County Kendall County

Orchard Rd City of Yorkville Village of Montgomery

Bristol Township Aurora Township Oswego Township Sugar Grove Township

Length = 5 miles

Village of Sugar Grove Village of Oswego City of Aurora

Roadway Classification = Strategic Regional Arterial

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Study Area

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Project Development Process

We Are Here

Phase II & Phase III are not included in IDOT’s FY 2013-2018 Multi-Modal Transportation Program 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Phase I Process

Public Involvement Data Collection Develop Purpose & Need Alternatives Analysis

Preferred Alternative Public Meeting 1

  • Sept. 2012

Public Meeting 2 Summer 2013 Public Hearing Early 2014

  • Community Advisory Group Meeting

2012 2013 2014 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Context Sensitive Solutions

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

An approach that:

  • Involves stakeholders early and
  • ften in development of a

solution

  • Focuses on developing and

building projects that reflect their surroundings or “context”

  • Focuses both on outcome (design)

and process

  • Considers various disciplines from

the beginning of the project through construction Features:

  • Frequent and meaningful

communication

  • Outreach guided by Stakeholder

Involvement Plan

  • Goal of developing cost effective

transportation facilities that preserve and enhance community features

What is Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS)?

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Blueprint for defining outreach tools and

methods

  • Framework for collecting stakeholder

input

  • Identifies roles and responsibilities of

participants

  • Establishes baseline for timing of

stakeholder involvement activities

  • Dynamic document that is updated as

appropriate throughout the study

  • SIP can be viewed online at

www.us30baselineroadstudy.org

Stakeholder Involvement Plan

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Community Advisory Group Project Website Project Newsletters Public Meetings Media

Participate more directly in the project. Join today! US30baselineroadstudy.org Learn more about project progress! Will be held at key milestones! Watch your local papers for articles!

We encourage all who are interested to take part in the project. It is only through the participation of those who live and work in the area that the best possible project can be achieved.

Stakeholder Involvement Methods

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Public Meeting #1 Overview & Feedback

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Public Meeting Summary

  • September 13, 2012 - Kaneland- McDole Elementary School, 4 – 7 PM.
  • Open house format: continuously cycling presentation, exhibit boards, and

large scale aerial exhibits of existing conditions.

  • Attended by 25 people
  • 4 comment forms received through comment period (ended September 27)

– Several recent serious accidents have occurred in the study area – Desire for addition of a turn lane at the Aurora Sportsman Club (Sta. 1241 +/-) – Representatives from the Village of Montgomery expressed a concern with flooding east of Orchard Road – Current and future concerns about access to and from Fairfield Way subdivision – Concerns about safety and noise if roadway widened closer to homes – Support for path on the north side of the roadway with access to Stuart Sports Complex and pedestrian overpass near Griffin Drive 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Needs Identified to Date

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Safety

  • Areas with high crashes identified by

examining:

– Crash locations – Type/severity of crashes

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Crash Locations

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Crash Types

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 1 3 5 2 9 20 8 34 15 13 10 80 16 20 10 16 22 84 1 1 25 58 30 31 41 185 "K" (Fatality) TOTAL CRASH SEVERITY YEAR TOTAL "A" Injury (Incapacitating) "B" Injury (Non-incapacitating) "C" Injury (Reported, not apparent)

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 32 46 52 28 28 186 49.3% 18 28 19 11 13 89 23.6% 6 6 5 11 5 33 8.8% 1 4 6 6 2 19 5.0% 7 6 3 2 1 19 5.0% 2 4 5 2 13 3.4% 2 9 5 2 18 4.8% 66 96 99 63 53 377 100% TOTAL Fixed Object Head-on Sideswipe (Same Direction) Angle All Other COLLISION TYPE YEAR TOTAL % OF TOTAL CRASHES Rear End Turning

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Congestion

  • Measured by examining:

– Level of Service (LOS) – Traffic Volumes (current/projected)

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Level of Service

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Average Daily Traffic Volumes

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Group Exercise

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Group Exercise

  • Identify key transportation issues & concerns

– Write concerns on index cards (one concern per card) & stick to “Concern Wall”

  • Group like concerns/issues
  • Use five finger voting to prioritize concerns – as

needed

  • Use issues and priorities to define problem

statement

– Problem statement records why a project is being undertaken – “The issues this project will seek to address are…”

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Next Steps

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

What’s Next?

Outreach & Coordination Technical Work

Define Purpose & Need Alternatives Development Community Context Audit CAG Meeting #2

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Community Context Audit

  • Community Characteristics/Land Use
  • Infrastructure Assessment
  • Neighborhood Culture, Aesthetics and Street

Amenities

  • Economic Development
  • Community Planning

USED TO HELP DEVELOP PURPOSE & NEED FOR PROJECT 33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

CAG Meeting #2

  • Approximate date
  • Location?
  • Time Preference?
  • Suggestions for additional membership?
  • Community Planning

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Define Purpose & Need

  • Consider Public Meeting & CAG input
  • Validate and quantify through technical

analysis

  • Coordinate findings with public, CAG, IDOT &

FHWA

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Alternatives Development

  • Develop Initial Range of Alternatives
  • Consider input/additional alternatives
  • Evaluate Alternatives

– Technical quantitative analysis – Qualitative analysis from CAG workshop input

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Questions?

37