Urban Water Security Research Alliance Potential Health Risks from - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

urban water security research alliance
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Urban Water Security Research Alliance Potential Health Risks from - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Urban Water Security Research Alliance Potential Health Risks from Pathogens in Alternative Waters Jatinder Sidhu Health Risk Assessment of Local Source Waters Science Forum, 19-20 June 2012 Captured Stormwater Alternative water source


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Potential Health Risks from Pathogens in Alternative Waters Jatinder Sidhu

Health Risk Assessment of Local Source Waters

Science Forum, 19-20 June 2012

Urban Water Security Research Alliance

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Captured Stormwater

  • Alternative water source which can be

used to augment non-potable and potable supplies around cities

  • Involves collection of runoff from creeks

and drains

  • Potential health risks from pathogens
  • Understanding of loadings and sources of

pathogens required for improved health risk assessment

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Aims of the study

  • to determine the prevalence
  • f pathogens
  • to check association between

MST and chemical markers

  • f sewage pollution
  • to determine if adenovirus

numbers vary during the storm event

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Sampling Sites

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Makerston Street site

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Site Description

Site name Land Use Potential source of faecal pollution Fitzgibbon drain, Brisbane Residential Sewage pipe network, small numbers of horses and cattle Hornsby, Sydney Urban roads/carpark Sewage pipe network Banyan Creek, Melbourne Residential Sewage pipe network, Smith Street, Melbourne Commercial Sewage pipe network, industry Makerston Street, Brisbane City, commercial Sewage pipe network

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Autosamplers

Makerston street Fitzgibbon drain

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Stormwater Sampling

  • 20-40L samples collected

from 5 sites in Melbourne, Brisbane and Sydney

  • Five mL concentrated

sample used for detection

  • f MST markers and

pathogens

  • One L sample used for the

capture of Adenovirus

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Methodology

  • Pathogens

– Hemoflow HF80S filters – PCR detection

  • Faecal indicators

– Membrane filtration

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Microorganisms

  • Viral Pathogens

– Adenovirus

  • Bacterial Pathogens

– Campylobacter jejuni

  • MST markers

– Bacteroides HF183 – Metahonobrevibacter smithii nifH

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Chemical Markers

  • Food

– Caffeine – Acesulfame

  • Pharmaceuticals

– Paracetamol – Aspirin

slide-12
SLIDE 12

FIB Results

  • E. coli numbers as 40

to 6560 cfu 100mL-1

  • Enterococcus spp.

numbers 1930 to 22600 cfu 100mL-1

  • Enterococcus spp.

numbers tenfold or more higher than E. coli across all sites

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Sites FIB* Pathogens MST markers Food markers Pharmaceuticals

  • E. coli

Enterococ cus Adeno virus

  • C. jejuni

HF183 nifH Acesulfame Caffeine Paracetamol Aspirin

Fitzgibbon 8/12/2011 3600 16700

+

  • +

+ + +

  • +

3560 11800

+ + + + + + +

17/04/2012 Hornsby 40 1930

+

  • +
  • +

+ + +

15/02/2012 100 20900

+ + +

  • +

+ + +

20/02/2012 Banyan Creek 3400 10200

+

  • +
  • +

+ +

  • 9/11/2011

7200 22600

+ + +

  • +

+ + +

6/02/2012

  • Smith Street

6560 152000

+ + + + +

  • +
  • 30/09/2011
  • 7900

+

  • +

+

  • 28/02/2012
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Biological and Chemical markers

  • Eight samples tested from four sites
  • All samples (100%) positive for Adenovirus

and HF183

  • Five samples (63%) positive for five

markers, two positive (25%) for four markers

  • Chemical and MST markers confirm

presence of sewage contamination

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Adenovirus Results

1 2 3 4 5

0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50

100 200 300 400 500

Adenovirus number L-1 Water Depth

Sam ple Num ber 1 2 3 4 5 6 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Adenovirus number L-1 Water Depth Sam ple Num ber

Makerston St Fitzgibbon St

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Adenovirus

  • Both sites tested positive for Adenovirus
  • Makerston Street numbers 148 to 400 pdu L-1
  • All samples positive during the storm event
  • Fitzgibbon drain numbers 0 to 9000 pdu L-1
  • From Fitzgibbon drain data, higher numbers

appear to coincide with peak of event

  • Potentially other enteric virus also present
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Conclusions

  • Enterococcus spp. numbers several fold higher than

category D (<501 Enterococci per 100mL-1) under Australian guidelines for managing risks in recreational water (NHMRC 2008).

  • Adenovirus present in samples from all sites.
  • C. jejuni detected in 50% of samples from 4 sites tested.
  • Wide prevalence of MST and chemical markers suggest

sewage contamination of stormwater.

  • Some degree of captured stormwater treatment is required

prior to non-potable use.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Co-authors:

  • R. Aryal, A. Palmer, W. Ahmed and S. Toze
  • Urban Water Security Research Alliance, a scientific collaboration

between the Queensland government, CSIRO, The University of Queensland and Griffith University

  • Monash University’s Cities as Water Supply Catchments program

funded by the National Water Commission, the Victoria Smart Water Fund and a broad range of governmental and industry partners as listed on the program’s website (http://www.watersensitivecities.org.au/programs/cities-as-water- supply-catchments/)

Acknowledgements

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Urban Water Security Research Alliance THANK YOU! www.urbanwateralliance.org.au