uranium mining amp milling in new mexico past activities
play

Uranium Mining & Milling in New Mexico: Past Activities & - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Uranium Mining & Milling in New Mexico: Past Activities & Environmental Challenges Bruce Thomson Civil Engineering & Water Resources (bthomson@unm.edu) 1 Uranium & Water Introduction Historically NM produced ~50% of U.S.


  1. Uranium Mining & Milling in New Mexico: Past Activities & Environmental Challenges Bruce Thomson Civil Engineering & Water Resources (bthomson@unm.edu) 1 Uranium & Water

  2. Introduction  Historically NM produced ~50% of U.S. domestic production  There is value in understanding past successes and challenges to establish basis for evaluating future development  Objective:  Summarize history of U mining & milling in NM  Discuss mining & milling technologies used in the past  Consider environmental challenges 2 Uranium & Water

  3. World U Resources  NM has ~350 M lbs @ $50/lb 160  140 38% of US supply 120 Price ($/lb U3O8) 100 80 60 40 20 0 9/02 1/04 5/05 10/06 2/08 7/09 11/10 4/12 8/13 Year 3 Uranium & Water

  4. U Mineralogy  Two oxidation states  U(VI)  U(IV)  Common U minerals  UO 2(s) - Uraninite  USiO 4(s) - Coffinite 4 Uranium & Water

  5. 5 Uranium & Water • Often associated with (Devoto, 1978) U Minerals • There’re a LOT!! other metals

  6. Types of U Ore Deposits (Devoto, 1978)  Magmatic & igneous rocks  Crustal abundance ~2 ppm  Associated with granites & similar rocks  Some vein formation - felsic igneous & metamorphic rocks (Schwartzwalder Mine)  Sedimentary environments  Depositional (syngenetic) - placer & marine deposits  Diagenetic (epigenetic) - ground water transport & deposition  Weathering & transport as U-carbonate  Deposition in reducing zone - Roll front deposits  With Organic C, Mo, V, S,e As, S, CaCO 3 , feldspars, Fe- Mg Silicates 6 Uranium & Water

  7. 7 Diagram of Roll Front Deposit Uranium & Water

  8. U Resources in Grants Mineral Belt (McLemore, 2007) 8 Uranium & Water

  9. General Cross Section of San Juan Basin 9 Uranium & Water

  10. Geologic Cross Section (SJBRUS, 1981) Gallup Sandstone Dakota Sandstone Morrison Formation 10 Uranium & Water

  11. Mines & Mills in 1980 (SJBRUS, 1981) 11 Uranium & Water

  12. U Legacy in Navajo Nation • Summarized in “Health and Environmental Impacts of Uranium Contamination in the Navajo Nation”, DOI, EPA, NRC, DOE, IHS (2008) • >500 mine sites, 4 mill sites • Widespread contamination of soil & water Mines near Cove, AZ (Lameman-Austin) 12 Uranium & Water

  13. Uranium Resources in NM  Discovered in 1950 by Navajo sheepherder - Paddy Martinez  In 1979 NM produced ~50% of nation’s supply of U  38 mines  6 mills  ~7,000 employees  Then:  Three Mile Island (3/28/79)  Churchrock tailings dam failure (8/16/79)  370,000 m 3 of tailings solution  1,000 tonnes of tailings  Contaminated 110 km of Rio Puerco of the west  Now:  No mines or mills operating in NM 13 Uranium & Water

  14. Major Proposed U Mine Projects in NM ( http://www.wise-uranium.org/uousanm.html) Name Principal Company Resources (tones U 3 O 8 ) 8,023 b Cebolleta Project Neutron Energy, Inc. 3,313 a Churchrock – Strathmore Strathmore Minerals Corp. 7,154 b Churchrock – HRI Hydro Resources, Inc. 5,885 a Crownpoint – ISL Hydro Resources, Inc. 4,373 a Crownpoint Section 19/29 Tigris U Corp 4,030 a Hosta Butte Tigris U Corp 2,791 a La Jara Mesa Laramide Resources Ltd. 2,545 a Marquez Project Strathmore Minerals Corp 38,500 c Mt. Taylor Mine Rio Grande Resources 5,591 a Roca Honda Strathmore Minerals Corp. Notes: a – Indicated reserves b – Probable reserves c – Not specified 14 Uranium & Water

  15. U Mining  Conventional mining  Open pit mine - Laguna Jackpile Paguate Mine  Underground mining  Requires mine dewatering - up to 3,000 gal/min  Large power requirements for ventilation (Palo Verde nuclear generating station)  In situ leach (ISL) mining  Practiced in So. TX, & WY  Little impact on ground water resources  Little surface disturbance  Difficult to restore aquifer quality 15 Uranium & Water

  16. Method of Underground Mining (SJBRUS, 1981) 16 Uranium & Water

  17. 17 Underground Images Uranium & Water

  18. Average Water Quality of the Puerco River Concentration (mg/L) Constituent 1978 1979 SDWA Std Ba .016 0.125 2. - & NO 3 - NO 2 2.0 6.6 10.0 Se .025 .010 0.05 2- SO 4 204. 201.5 250* TDS 627. 609 500* U 0.63 0.40 0.03 * - Recommended maximum concentration 18 Uranium & Water

  19. Average Weighted Concentration of Mine Water Discharges Constituent 1975 1978 Flow 9.27 Mgal/d 13.5 Mgal/d TDS - 911 Se 0.059 .088 U 9.83 0.694 V 0.73 0.033 Ra-226 92.8 pCi/L 19 Uranium & Water

  20. Mine Water Treatment Mine Drainage Sedimentation Radium Pond Coprecipitation Discharge BaCl2 U Recovery (Ion Exchange) 20 Uranium & Water

  21. Major Aquifers in San Juan Basin Aquifer Thickness (ft) TDS (mg/L) Alluvium 0-100 200-9,200 Kirtland Shale 0-1,500 700 – 4,000 Gallup Sandstone 0-500 300 – 4,000 Dakota Sandstone 0-250 300-59,000 Morrison 50-800 170-5,600 Formation 21 Uranium & Water

  22. Impact on Ground Water Resources (SJBRUS, 1981) 22 Uranium & Water

  23. Uranium Ore U Milling Ore Crushing & Water Grinding HSO  Acid (or alkaline) leach process 2 4 Oxidation & Leaching  Oxidize U(IV) to U(VI) ecycle  Dissolve in acid (or base) affinate R Countercurrent Decantation  Recover by solvent extraction Tailings Slurry (Sand, Slime &Liquids R or IX Solvent Extraction Amine & Kerosene  Precipitate as U 3 O 8 ecycle olvent Feed S  R Acid leach - low Ca in ore (pH > Stripping 10)  Alkalinie leach - high Ca in ore UO Precipitation Ammonia (pH < 2) 3 8 Filtration, Drying & Packaging Yellowcake (UO) 3 8 23 Uranium & Water

  24. 24 Kerr McGee U Mill Tailings (1980) Uranium & Water

  25. 25 Kerr McGee/Quivira (Oct.2012) Uranium & Water

  26. 26 U Mill Tailings – Homestake Uranium & Water (1980)

  27. Homestake Mill Tailings Pile (Oct. 2012) 27 Uranium & Water

  28. Mill Tailings Decant Water Quality Constituent SDWA MCL 4 Acid Mills 1 Alkaline (mg/L) in NM Mill in NM 5.0 As .010 1.3 Mo 0.9 98.0 NH 3 (as N) 400.0 16.0 Se .050 29,700. 8,400. U .030 74.0 14.0 TDS 500. 39,800. 25,400. pH 1.05 10.1 Ra-226 5. 70.0 58.0 (pCi/L) Gross-  15.0 38,000. 6,700. (pCi/L) 28 Uranium & Water

  29. Roca Honda Mine (Draft EIS - http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=18431)  Proposed underground mine on Forest Service property  Ore depth 1,650 – 2,650 ft  Mining period of 18-19 yrs  ~25 dewatering wells to produce 4,000 gal/min (6,400 AF/yr)  Possible reuse for pastures  Discharge to arroyo  Issues: Water, vegetation, wildlife, culture, socioeconomic, health, safety, environmental justice, etc. 29 Uranium & Water

  30. Roca Honda Mine Dewatering Impacts (DEIS) 10 ft 100 ft 1000 ft At end of project After 100 years 30 Uranium & Water

  31. 31 Uranium & Water Churchrock Tailings Dam Failure

  32. In Situ Leach/Recovery Mining of U (ISL/ISR)  ISR began in 1974 in TX.  Typical ISR mines are relatively small (< 1000 ton/yr)  26% of world U production  Criteria for ISR  Confined aquifer  Sandstone  May do alkaline (pH > 8) or acid (2.5 < pH < 3) leach depending on Ca content  High Ca content (calcite) suggests alkaline leach World Nuclear Association web site 32 Uranium & Water

  33. ISL/ISR Technology  Circulate oxidizing solution through ore deposit 2- using IX  Recover UO 2 (CO 3 ) 2  Recycle leachate 33 Uranium & Water

  34. ISR Technology (Pelizza, 2007)  ~30 licensed facilities in US - NB, WY, TX,  Pelizza claims that pre-mining ground water quality at ISR sites do not meet SDWA criteria due to U, Ra, Rn & gross alpha. Data for Duval County, TX Parameter Avg. Conc. EPA MCL U (ug/L) 488 30 226 Ra (pCi/L) 215 5.0 222 Rn (pCi/L) 207,133 300 Gross Alpha (pCi/L) 865 15 34 Uranium & Water

  35. Chemistry of ISR  Oxidation by O 2 from U(IV) to U(VI): UO 2 + 2H + + 1/2 O 2 = UO 2 2+ + H 2 O - = UO 2 (CO 3 ) 2 UO 2 2+ + 2HCO 3 2-  Lixiviant = leaching solution  Raffinate = leaching solution containing dissolved U  U(VI) recovered by ion exchange (R = resin sites) 2- = R 2 -UO 2 (CO 3 ) 2 + 2Cl - 2R-Cl + UO 2 (CO 3 ) 2 35 Uranium & Water

  36. Yellowcake Processing  U is eluted from loaded resins with salt (NaCl) to provide concentrate  HCl is added to destroy carbonate complex 2- + 4H + = UO 2 2+ + 2H 2 CO 3 UO 2 (CO 3 ) 2 2+ (uranyl ions) oxidized with H 2 O 2  UO 2 2+ + H 2 O 2 + xH 2 O = UO 4 . xH 2 O UO 2  Most commonly written as U 3 O 8 - yellowcake  Yellowcake is washed, filtered & dried.  Can also recover U via NH 3 precipitation 36 Uranium & Water

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend