updated results from the slac
play

Updated Results from the SLAC ESTB T-506 Irradiation Study 2014 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Updated Results from the SLAC ESTB T-506 Irradiation Study 2014 Linear Collider Workshop Belgrade, Serbia 6-10 October 2014 Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics On behalf of the FCAL Collaboration T-506 Motivation


  1. Updated Results from the SLAC ESTB T-506 Irradiation Study 2014 Linear Collider Workshop Belgrade, Serbia 6-10 October 2014 Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics On behalf of the FCAL Collaboration

  2. T-506 Motivation BeamCal maximum dose ~100 MRad/yr BeamCal is sizable: ~2 m 2 of sensors. A number of ongoing studies with novel sensers: GaAs, CVD diamond  Are these radiation tolerant?  Also, might mainstream Si sensors be of use? Some reasons for optimism for Si… 2

  3. Departure from NIEL (non-ionizing energy-loss) scaling observed for electron irradiation e - Energy NIEL 2x10 -2 0.5 MeV 5x10 -2 2 MeV 1x10 -1 10 MeV 2x10 -1 200 MeV G.P. Summers et al., IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 40 , 1372 (1993) Also: for ~50 MRad illumination of 900 MeV electrons, little loss of charge collection seen for wide variety of sensors [ S. Dittongo et al., NIM A 530, 110 (2004)] But what about the hadronic component of EM shower? 3

  4. Hadronic Processes in EM Showers There seem to be three main processes for generating hadrons in EM showers (all induced by photons ): • Nuclear (“giant dipole”) resonances Resonance at 10-20 MeV (~E critical ) • Photoproduction Threshold seems to be about 200 MeV • Nuclear Compton scattering Threshold at about 10 MeV;  resonance at 340 MeV  These are largely isotropic; must have most of hadronic component develop near sample 4

  5. Irradiating the Sensors 5

  6. LCLS and ESA Use pulsed magnets in the beam switchyard to send beam in ESA. Mauro Pivi SLAC, ESTB 2011 Workshop, Page 6

  7. ESTB parameters Parameters ESA Energy 3.5-10.5 (for now) 15 GeV Repetition Rate 5 Hz Up to 10 Hz! 0.25 nC ≤ 0.15 nC Charge per pulse 0.35 nC Energy spread, s E /E 0.02% 100 m m Bunch length rms Emittance rms ( ge x ,ge y ) (4, 1) 10 -6 m-rad Spot size at waist ( s x,y ) < 10 m m Drift Space available for experimental 60 m apparatus Transverse space available for experimental 5 x 5 m apparatus

  8. Daughter Board Assembly Pitch adapter, bonds Sensor 1 inch 8

  9. 2 X 0 pre-radiator; introduces a little divergence in shower Sensor sample Not shown: 4 X 0 and 8 X 0 radiators just before and after sensor

  10. Detector Fluence Distribution (per incident e - ) For later charge Fluence (particles per cm 2 ) collection measurement, must have ~1cm 2 uniformly illuminated area  Raster sensor across beam 1.0 2.0 3.0 10 Radius (cm)

  11. Dose Rates (Including 1 cm 2 Rastering) Mean fluence per incident e - Confirmed with RADFET to within 10% Maximum dose rate (10.6 GeV; 10 Hz; 150 pC per pulse): 28 Mrad per hour 11

  12. T506 Si Doses “P” = p - type “N” = n -type “F” = float zone “C” = Czochralski 12

  13. T506 GaAs Doses New this year: GaAs pad sensors via Georgy Shelkov, JINR Dubna Irradiated with 5.7 and 21.0 Mrad doses of electromagnetically-induced showers Irradiation temperature 3 o C; samples held 13 and measured at -15 o C

  14. Assessing the Radiation Damage 14

  15. Daughter/Readout Board Assembly 15

  16. Charge Collection Apparatus • Readout: 300 ns Sensor + FE ASIC DAQ FPGA with Ethernet 16

  17. Charge Collection Measurement 2.3 MeV e - through sensor into scintillator Median Collected Charge Channel-over- Efficiency vs. threshold profile threshold 17

  18. Results 18

  19. Results: PF sensors Doses of 5 and 20 Mrad No annealing 19

  20. Results: PC sensors Dose of 20 Mrad No annealing 20

  21. Results: NF sensor for low dose Doses of 5 and 20 Mrad No annealing 21

  22. Results: NF Sensor to 90 Mrad, Plus Annealing Study Dose of 90 Mrad Limited beneficial annealing to 90 o C (reverse annealing above 100 o C?) 22

  23. Results: NC sensors Dose of 220 Mrad Incidental annealing ~15% charge loss at 300 ns shaping 23

  24. GaAs Charge Collection after 5.7 Mrad Exposure GaAs Dose of 5.7 Mrad No annealing 15-20% charge loss at 300 ns shaping 24

  25. Compare to Direct Electron Radiation Results (no EM Shower) Georgy Shelkov, JINR 1000 kGy = 100 Mrad kGy Roughly consistent with direct result 25

  26. Summary and Conclusions • In midst of a program of study of radiation damage in a realistic EM shower environment • Have irradiated and studied several Si sensors to as much as 220 Mrad, and GaAs to 6 Mrad. • Si sensors show some promise to survive the BeamCal integrated dose • GaAs shows charge loss at 6 Mrad, but still need to do annealing studies • Will soon explore 21 Mrad GaAs sensor and do annealing studies on both GaAs sensors • Expect to run at higher fluence in 2015 26

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend