Super-B-Factory Collider Work at SLAC U. Wienands, for John T. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

super b factory collider work at slac
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Super-B-Factory Collider Work at SLAC U. Wienands, for John T. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SLAC Accelerator Department Super-B-Factory Collider Work at SLAC U. Wienands, for John T. Seeman SLAC Hawaii Super-B-Factory Meeting April 20, 2005 SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Team August 2004 3 SLAC Accelerator


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SLAC Accelerator Department

Super-B-Factory Collider Work at SLAC

  • U. Wienands, for John T. Seeman

SLAC Hawaii Super-B-Factory Meeting April 20, 2005

slide-2
SLIDE 2

SLAC Accelerator Department

3

The PEP-II Team

  • August 2004
slide-3
SLIDE 3

SLAC Accelerator Department

4

Topics

  • Brief PEP-II status and plans
  • Super-B-Factory Collider parameter studies
  • Conclusions
slide-4
SLIDE 4

SLAC Accelerator Department

5

SLAC Beam Lines

slide-5
SLIDE 5

SLAC Accelerator Department

6

PEP-II Interaction Region Components near BaBar

HER LER Collision point BaBar

slide-6
SLIDE 6

SLAC Accelerator Department

7

PEP-II arc section

slide-7
SLIDE 7

SLAC Accelerator Department

8

PEP-II HER RF cavities

slide-8
SLIDE 8

SLAC Accelerator Department

9

  • Total >240 fb-1!
slide-9
SLIDE 9

SLAC Accelerator Department

10

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SLAC Accelerator Department

11

PEP-II Performance Measure: Peak Luminosity

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SLAC Accelerator Department

12

Trickle injection at the B Factories

Best shift, no trickle

PEP-II: ~5 Hz continuous KEKB: at ~5-10 min intervals

Best shift, LER only trickle

Nov 2003

Best shift, double trickle

Mar 2004

PEP-II Lumi HER current LER current

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SLAC Accelerator Department

13

Overall Parameters and Goals

0.055-0.08 0.045, 0.07 0.03 ξy 1800 710 130 pb-1 Integrated lumi / day 23 9.2 3.0 x1033 Luminosity 8.5 11 15-20 mm βy* 1715 1588 1658 Number bunches 2200 1550 750 mA I- 4500 2450 2140 mA I+ Future 2007 goal Best in collision Design Units Parameter

Over five times design! Over three times design Twice design

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SLAC Accelerator Department

14

PEP-II Run Schedule

  • SLAC was shut down until early April due to

electrical accident & ensuing safety reviews

  • PEP-II Run 5 started April 15, 2005.
  • Will collide steadily from April 2005 through

July 2006 with a one month break in October 2005.

  • Down in 2006 August through November for

BaBar and PEP-II upgrade work.

  • Three month down in Summer-Fall 2007 for

LCLS work.

  • Collide through September 2008.
slide-14
SLIDE 14

SLAC Accelerator Department

15

Integrated Luminosity Goal

PEP II Integrated Luminosity (1/fb)

0.0 200.0 400.0 600.0 800.0 1000.0 1200.0 A p r i l A u g

  • 5

D e c e m b e r A p r i l A u g

  • 6

D e c e m b e r A p r i l A u g

  • 7

D e c e m b e r A p r i l A u g

  • 8

Month ∫Ldt Series1

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SLAC Accelerator Department

16

Upgrades for Run 5

  • One additional rf station for each HER and

LER

– HER beam current >1.8 A, LER, 3.6 A

  • Removed NEGs in the LER upstream of

BaBar

– rf power leaking through screen caused severe heating. – more to be replaced in October

slide-16
SLIDE 16

SLAC Accelerator Department

17 Existing 3082 chamber

BPM BPM Chamber support Cooling bar NEG plenum NEG heater Quad extrusion

slide-17
SLIDE 17

SLAC Accelerator Department

18

Chamber shown inverted and plenum not shown for clarity SiC HOM absorber

slide-18
SLIDE 18

SLAC Accelerator Department

19

PEP-II/BaBar Roadmap: Super B-Factory Study May 2004

  • The Roadmap Committee

is studying the long range future of PEP-II and BaBar with a possible large upgrade at the end of the decade.

  • A Super-PEP-II could

produce 10 ab-1 per year with a peak luminosity of 7 x 1035/cm2/s.

  • Accelerator parameter

goals have been set and work towards a solid design has started.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

SLAC Accelerator Department

20

Recommended scenario: 7 x 1035

  • Replace present RF with SC 952 MHz frequency over

period of time.

  • Use 8 x 3.5 GeV with up to 15.5 A x 6.8 A.
  • New LER and HER vacuum chambers with antechambers

for higher power (x 4).

  • Replace LER magnets to soften radiation and resistive wall

losses; rework HER magnets as well.

  • Push βy

* to 1.7 mm: need new IR (SC quadrupoles) with

15 mrad crossing angle and crab cavities with bunch lengths of 1.8 mm.

  • New bunch-by-bunch feedback for 6900 bunches (every

bucket) at 1 nsec spacing. (Presently designing feedback system being 0.6-0.8 nsec spacing.)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

SLAC Accelerator Department

21

SBF Overall Parameters and Goals

0.11 0.11 0.065 ξy 75 50 1.8 fb-1/day Integrated lumi / day 100 70 2.3 x1034 Luminosity 1.7 1.8 8.5 mm βy* 6900 6900 1715 Number bunches 23.0 15.5 2.2 A I- 10.0 6.8 4.5 A I+ 1E36 SBF 7E35 SBF Best of PEP-II Units Parameter

slide-21
SLIDE 21

SLAC Accelerator Department

22

Achieving Super B Luminosities

bnI

Higher Currents:

  • More rf power, cooling, injector
  • More HOM heating (more bunches)
  • Beam instabilities
  • Electron clouds, fast ions

Smaller βy*:

  • Smaller physical/dynamic aperture
  • Shorter lifetime, more background

Shorter σz:

  • More HOM heating
  • Coherent synchrotron radiation
  • Shorter lifetime, more background

Higher tune shifts:

  • Head-on collisions replaced by angled crossing
  • Degrades maximum tune shift unless crabbing

cavities used

Ib ßy* ξy

L ∝ nξy EIb βy

*

slide-22
SLIDE 22

SLAC Accelerator Department

23

Crossing-Angle Experiment

Normalized Lsp vs. e

  • angle

0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05

  • 1000
  • 500

500 1000

XP[e-] (murad) Lsp / Lsp(XP=0)

by-4, msrd by-4, fit

  • sp. by-2, msrd
  • sp. by-2, fit
  • W. Kozanecki
slide-23
SLIDE 23

SLAC Accelerator Department

24

Initial IR Design for a Super B-Factory

M.Sullivan ±14 mr crossing angle

  • First look at SR

backgrounds Try to limit luminosity component by minimizing bends

e36 B-factory IR +/- 14 mrads RevD

10 20 30

  • 10
  • 20
  • 30

2.5 5 7.5

  • 2.5
  • 5
  • 7.5

m cm

  • M. Sullivan Apr 16, 2005
B3$E36_2_5M_8D_RL

200 kW 40 kW 13 kW 83 kW 3 kW 11 kW

QF5 QD4 QF2 QD1 QD1 QF2 QD4 QF5 LER HER

slide-24
SLIDE 24

SLAC Accelerator Department

25

New IR magnet design (Parker)

  • B. Parker
slide-25
SLIDE 25

SLAC Accelerator Department

26

New IR magnet design

Quadrupole, anti- solenoid, skew quadrupole, dipole and trims located in one magnet. All coils numerically wound on a bobbin.

  • B. Parker
slide-26
SLIDE 26

SLAC Accelerator Department

27

New Rf system, s/c Technology

  • 1…2 MV/cavity, 500 kW/coupler
  • R/Q of 12Ω aimed at for beam stability
  • 952 MHz => Potential for 6900 bunches
  • up to 40 MW power to the beam (LER, 23 A)
  • Support bunches as short as 1.8 mm
slide-27
SLIDE 27

SLAC Accelerator Department

28

New cavity design for a SBF (SC, R/Q≈5Ω)

  • A. Novokhatski

Accelerating field Distance (cm)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

SLAC Accelerator Department

30

New Magnet Systems/Lattices

– Low momentum compaction

  • short bunches without excessive rf voltage
  • increase stability against longitudinal multibunch

instability

  • maintain reasonable synchrotron tune

– (simulations predict high νs to be detrimental to luminosity)

– Larger-aperture magnets than present PEP-II

  • allows increase of beam-pipe radius, lower res. wall loss
  • becoming an issue at SBF beam current & bunch length
slide-29
SLIDE 29

SLAC Accelerator Department

31

Resistive-Wall Wake (bunch lengthening)

Power SS: 45 MW Al: 9 MW Cu: 7 MW SR: 18 MW

  • A. Novokhatski
slide-30
SLIDE 30

SLAC Accelerator Department

32

New bellows design with HOM absorber

  • Kurita

Novokhatski Weathersby

slide-31
SLIDE 31

SLAC Accelerator Department

LER ring (no IR yet) Small positive momentum compaction, using present LER dipoles & quads (16 families), 3 sextupole families

  • M. Biagini

One sextant

slide-32
SLIDE 32

SLAC Accelerator Department

34

Electron Cloud Instability

  • PEP-II uses solenoidal fields and gaps in the

fill to mitigate ECI

– Experiment at end of Run 4: fill all gaps

  • Luminosity scaled with bunch#
  • =>probably don’t need the gap at present beam

current (2.6 A).

  • At Super-B beam currents, these may not be

sufficient

– Investigate means to further reduce secondary emission in the vacuum system

slide-33
SLIDE 33

SLAC Accelerator Department

35

Windings added for ECI reduction

slide-34
SLIDE 34

SLAC Accelerator Department

36

slide-35
SLIDE 35

SLAC Accelerator Department

37

Low-Secondary Yield Test Pipe

  • M. Pivi
slide-36
SLIDE 36

SLAC Accelerator Department

38

slide-37
SLIDE 37

SLAC Accelerator Department

39

slide-38
SLIDE 38

SLAC Accelerator Department

40

Wall-Plug Power

slide-39
SLIDE 39

SLAC Accelerator Department

41

Conclusions

  • PEP-II is again producing data.
  • Present B-Factories will provide solid data

for four or more years. PEP-II is heading towards 2.3 x 1034 in three years.

  • Super-B-Factory designs are stabilizing.
  • Designs of a Super-B-Factory should allow

for upgrade paths to allow the accelerator to remain competitive over its lifetime.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

SLAC Accelerator Department

42

Important Factors in Upgrade Direction

  • Accelerator project should have headroom:

– Design for 7 x 1035 – Headroom for machine up to 1 x 1036; requires additional RF, which can be staged into machine

  • ver time.
  • Accelerator built in the timely manner with a rapid turn
  • n.