higgs measurements at a muon collider higgs factory
play

Higgs Measurements at a Muon Collider Higgs Factory [Preliminary] - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Higgs Measurements at a Muon Collider Higgs Factory [Preliminary] Alexander Conway, UChicago Muon Collider Detector Research and Design Group aconway@fnal.gov 1 Muon Collider Detector Research and Desi gn Machine Parameters Average


  1. Higgs Measurements at a Muon Collider Higgs Factory [Preliminary] Alexander Conway, UChicago Muon Collider Detector Research and Design Group aconway@fnal.gov 1 Muon Collider Detector Research and Desi gn

  2. Machine Parameters ● Average luminosity: ● Integrated luminosity: (4.2 fb^-1) ● Number of Higgs: 71264 ● Beam spread: (0.004%) ● aconway@fnal.gov, Muon Collider Detector 2 Research and Design

  3. Higgs Parameters ● M_h = 125GeV ● Gamma_h = 4.07GeV – Br(h->bb) = 0.577 – Br(h->WW*) = 0.215 – Br(h->ta+ta-) = 0.063 ● (from LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group - arXiv:1201.3084v1) ● Initial state radiation reduces Higgs effective cross section to 53% – Cite Estia? aconway@fnal.gov, Muon Collider Detector 3 Research and Design

  4. Channels ● Bb – ~80% efficiency (compare to ILC Z->bb tagging) – Background from gamma*/Z (do energy cuts? -do both) ● ● WW* – H → WW* → l + nu + (l + nu or jj) (~ 54%) – No background ● Tau+tau- – 100% efficiency? – Background from gamma*/Z (do cuts? - do both) aconway@fnal.gov, Muon Collider Detector 4 Research and Design

  5. Channels b-bbar ● Signal: – Raw: 18.2pb – 53% ISR * 80% b-tag: ● 7.7pb (assume purity=1) – 52% (Energy/event shape cuts) ● 4.0pb ● Background: – Raw: 57.2pb – 80% b-tag ● 42.2pb – 15% (Energy/event shape cuts) ● 6.3pb aconway@fnal.gov, Muon Collider Detector 5 Research and Design

  6. Channels WW* tau+ tau- ● Require lepton and neutrino with ● Perfect tagging? – Two jets or ● h->tau+ tau- is – Lepton + neutrino – Raw: 2.0pb ● 54% of WW* events – 53% (ISR): ● h->WW* is ● 1.1pb – Raw: 6.8pb – 80% (Energy/event shape cuts): – 53% (ISR) * 54% (Br) ● 0.8pb ● Background is ● 1.9pb ● Background is – Raw: 12.8pb – Nothing (0.001pb because my – 40% (Energy/event shape cuts): program requires non-zero ● 5.1pb background) aconway@fnal.gov, Muon Collider Detector 6 Research and Design

  7. Cross Sections Channel Signal x-sect Background x- S/B S/sqrt(B) @ (pb) sect (pb) 4fb^-1 Bb – no cuts* 7.7 42.2 0.18 75 Bb - cuts** 4.0 6.3 0.63 101 WW* 1.9 0.001 --- --- ta+ta- - no cuts 2.0 12.8 0.16 35.4 ta+ta- - cuts** 0.8 5.1 0.16 22.4 *ISR correction and b-tagging applied **Energy and event shape cuts from report ● ISR reduces tau+tau- enough that no cuts is better. aconway@fnal.gov, Muon Collider Detector 7 Research and Design

  8. Data Simulation and Fitting ● Poisson statistics – Generate random values from Poisson distribution with expected value of (L/step)*(s+b). – Error = sqrt(N) ● Data points separated by beam spread ● How many points to take? – Try different numbers and use however many optimize fit? – How to quote #Higgs/yr if we are taking most data off-peak? aconway@fnal.gov, Muon Collider Detector 8 Research and Design

  9. Data Simulation and Fitting ● Fit function: – Breit-Wigner convoluted with Gaussian beam spread, multiplied by ISR correction and branching fraction, plus background cross section, times integrated luminosity per point. ● Fitting algorithm: – Residual: [(fit – data)/(data error)]^2 ● Minimize residual (Pearson's cumulative chi-square test statistic) with MIGRAD – Find errors in MIGRAD fit with MINOS ● Full non-parabolic error calculation ● Free Parameters: – Higgs mass, Higgs width, branching fraction ● Given Parameters: – Integrated luminosity, background cross section, signal efficiency, beam spread, initial state radiation correction aconway@fnal.gov, Muon Collider Detector 9 Research and Design

  10. Data Simulation and Fitting Quality of Fit ● Simulate new data and aconway@fnal.gov, Muon Collider Detector 10 Research and Design

  11. B-bbar with cuts aconway@fnal.gov, Muon Collider Detector 11 Research and Design

  12. aconway@fnal.gov, Muon Collider Detector 12 Research and Design

  13. Data Simulation and Fitting Channel Signal x- Background Fitted Mass Fitted Width Fitted sect (pb) x-sect (pb) (MeV) (MeV) Branching Fraction Bb – no cuts* 7.7 42.2 0.06+-0.3 3.9+-0.5 0.58+-0.01 Bb - cuts** 4.0 6.3 0.10+-0`.14 4.14+-0.3 0.583+-0.005 WW* 1.9 0.001 0.27+-0.02 ta+ta- - no cuts 2.0 12.8 ta+ta- - cuts** 0.8 5.1 *ISR correction and b-tagging applied **Energy and event shape cuts from report ● ISR reduces tau+tau- enough that no cuts is better. aconway@fnal.gov, Muon Collider Detector 13 Research and Design

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend