Status of a next-generation electron-positron collider: ILC and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

status of a next generation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Status of a next-generation electron-positron collider: ILC and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Status of a next-generation electron-positron collider: ILC and CLIC Philip Burrows John Adams Institute, Oxford University 1 Outline Introduction The Higgs boson + the Large Hadron Collider An e+e- collider Higgs factory


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Philip Burrows

John Adams Institute, Oxford University

Status of a next-generation electron-positron collider: ILC and CLIC

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Outline

  • Introduction
  • The Higgs boson + the Large Hadron Collider
  • An e+e- collider Higgs factory
  • International Linear Collider (ILC)
  • Compact Linear Collider (CLIC)
  • Project implementation and timeline
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

Largest, highest-energy particle collider

CERN, Geneva

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The 2012 discovery

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

It’s officially a Higgs Boson!

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Finger-printing the Higgs boson

Determine its ‘profile’:

  • Mass
  • Width
  • Spin
  • CP nature
  • Coupling to fermions
  • Coupling to gauge bosons
  • Yukawa coupling to top quark
  • Self coupling  Higgs potential
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Higgs production cross section

7

Heather Gray

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Higgs mass/width

8

Heather Gray

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Higgs spin/parity

9

Heather Gray

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Higgs couplings

10

Heather Gray

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Finger-printing the Higgs boson

Is it: the Higgs Boson of the Standard Model? another type of Higgs boson? something that looks like a Higgs boson but is actually more complicated?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Finger-printing the Higgs boson

Is it: the Higgs Boson of the Standard Model? another type of Higgs boson? something that looks like a Higgs boson but is actually more complicated?  Measurements of the Higgs couplings to the different species of quarks, leptons and gauge bosons are the key to answering these questions

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Non-Standard Higgs couplings

Snowmass Higgs working group: Decoupling limit: If all new particles (except Higgs) are at a (high) high mass scale M deviations from SM predictions are of order mH

2 / M2

slide-14
SLIDE 14

For M = 1 TeV, deviations of couplings from SM:

14

Non-Standard Higgs couplings

slide-15
SLIDE 15

For M = 1 TeV, deviations of couplings from SM: Deviations in the range 1%  10%

15

Non-Standard Higgs couplings

slide-16
SLIDE 16

For M = 1 TeV, deviations of couplings from SM: Deviations in the range 1%  10%  measurements must be significantly more precise to resolve such deviations

Non-Standard Higgs couplings

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

LHC projections

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

LHC projections

Currently, typically LHC projected precisions on Higgs coupling measurements assume that:

  • Standard Model is correct
  • No non-Standard decay modes (total width = SM)
  • Charm and top couplings deviate from SM by

same factor

slide-19
SLIDE 19

ATLAS projections

19

ATL PHYS PUB 2013 014

Luca Fiorini, LHCC Dec 2013

slide-20
SLIDE 20

CMS projections

20

CMS-NOTE-2013-002 Yurii Maravin, LHCC Dec 2013

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

LHC projections

Currently, typically LHC projected precisions on Higgs coupling measurements assume that:

  • Standard Model is correct
  • No non-Standard decay modes (total width = SM)
  • Charm and top couplings deviate from SM by

same factor Such assumptions are not necessary for Higgs coupling measurements at e+e- Higgs Factory …

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

e+e- Higgs factory

e+e- annihilations: E > 91 + 125 = 216 GeV E ~ 250 GeV E > 91 + 250 = 341 GeV E ~ 500 GeV

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

e+e- colliders

  • Produce annihilations of point-like particles under

controlled conditions:

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

e+e- colliders

  • Produce annihilations of point-like particles under

controlled conditions: well defined centre of mass energy: 2E

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

e+e- colliders

  • Produce annihilations of point-like particles under

controlled conditions: well defined centre of mass energy: 2E complete control of event kinematics: p = 0, M = 2E

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

e+e- colliders

  • Produce annihilations of point-like particles under

controlled conditions: well defined centre of mass energy: 2E complete control of event kinematics: p = 0, M = 2E polarised beam(s)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

e+e- annihilations

L or R

g/

L or R

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

e+e- colliders

  • Produce annihilations of point-like particles under

controlled conditions: well defined centre of mass energy: 2E complete control of event kinematics: p = 0, M = 2E polarised beam(s) clean experimental environment

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

European particle physics strategy 2013

There is a strong scientific case for an electron-positron collider, complementary to the LHC, that can study the properties of the Higgs boson and other particles with unprecedented precision and whose energy can be upgraded.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

European particle physics strategy 2013

There is a strong scientific case for an electron-positron collider, complementary to the LHC, that can study the properties of the Higgs boson and other particles with unprecedented precision and whose energy can be upgraded. The Technical Design Report of the International Linear Collider (ILC) has been completed, with large European participation. The initiative from the Japanese particle physics community to host the ILC in Japan is most welcome, and European groups are eager to participate.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

European particle physics strategy 2013

There is a strong scientific case for an electron-positron collider, complementary to the LHC, that can study the properties of the Higgs boson and other particles with unprecedented precision and whose energy can be upgraded. The Technical Design Report of the International Linear Collider (ILC) has been completed, with large European participation. The initiative from the Japanese particle physics community to host the ILC in Japan is most welcome, and European groups are eager to participate. Europe looks forward to a proposal from Japan to discuss a possible participation.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

e+e- Higgs Factory

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Possible Higgs Factory Roadmap

250 GeV: Mass, Spin, CP nature Absolute measurement of HZZ BRs Higgs  qq, ll, VV 350-380 GeV: Absolute HWW measurements Top threshold: mass, width, anomalous couplings … 500 GeV: Higgs self coupling Top Yukawa coupling  1000 GeV: as motivated by physics

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Higgs mass measurement

Recoil mass:

  • independent of

Higgs decay Discovery mode for ‘H’ decay to weakly-interacting particles (Fujii)

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Higgs spin determination

Rise of cross-section near threshold

(TESLA TDR)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Higgs branching ratios determination

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Higgs self-coupling determination

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Higgs top-coupling determination

(Price, Roloff)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Baseline: 250 fb-1 @ 250 GeV 3 years 500 fb-1 @ 500 GeV 3 years 1000 fb-1 @ 1000 GeV 3 years

ILC roadmap

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Baseline: 250 fb-1 @ 250 GeV 3 years 500 fb-1 @ 500 GeV 3 years 1000 fb-1 @ 1000 GeV 3 years Followed by luminosity upgrade: ‘HL-ILC’: +900 fb-1 @ 250 GeV +3 years +1100 fb-1 @ 500 GeV +3 years +1500 fb-1 @ 1000 GeV +3 years

ILC roadmap

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

ILC baseline precisions

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

Model-independent couplings extraction

33 input measurements 11-parameter fit

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

Higgs coupling map

(Fujii)

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

ILC baseline + HL-ILC precisions

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

Model-independent couplings

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

Model-dependent couplings extraction

~10 x LHC sensitivity

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

Specific beyond-SM examples

2HDM/MSSM

Zivkovic et al

Simulated ILC measurements

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

The linear collider projects

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

International Linear Collider (ILC)

31 km

  • c. 250 GeV / beam
slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

Beam parameters

ILC (500) Electrons/bunch 0.75 10**10 Bunches/train 2820 Train repetition rate 5 Hz Bunch separation 308 ns Train length 868 us Horizontal IP beam size 655 nm Vertical IP beam size 6 nm Longitudinal IP beam size 300 um Luminosity 2 10**34

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

ILC Detectors

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

ILC project status

  • 2005-12 ILC run by Global Design Effort (Barish)
  • C. 500 accelerator scientists worldwide involved
  • A Reference Design Report (RDR) was completed in 2007

including a first cost estimate

  • 2008-12

engineering design phase major focus on risk minimisation + cost reduction

  • Technical Design Report released end 2012

revised cost estimate + project implementation plan

  • Lyn Evans assumed project leadership 2013

Japan preparing implementation of ILC at Kitakami

slide-53
SLIDE 53

ILC Technical Design Report

John Adams Institute leadership

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Kitakami Site

54

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Kitakami Site

55

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Kitakami Site: Interaction Point

56

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Kitakami Site: Interaction Point

57

slide-58
SLIDE 58

National news

58

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Regional enthusiasm

59

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Local enthusiasm

60

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Kitakami Site: road to port

61

slide-62
SLIDE 62

ILC in Japan?

meeting of Lyn Evans and Prime Minister Abe, March 27, 2013

slide-63
SLIDE 63
slide-64
SLIDE 64

Michizono

slide-65
SLIDE 65
slide-66
SLIDE 66
slide-67
SLIDE 67
slide-68
SLIDE 68

Accelerator collaboration Detector collaboration Accelerator + Detector collaboration 31 Countries – over 50 Institutes

31 Countries – over 70 Institutes

CLIC Collaborations

slide-69
SLIDE 69

CLIC physics context

69

Energy-frontier capability for electron-positron collisions, for precision exploration

  • f potential

new physics that may emerge from LHC

slide-70
SLIDE 70

70

1.5 TeV / beam

CLIC layout (3 TeV)

slide-71
SLIDE 71

CLIC detector model

ultra low-mass vertex detector, ~25 μm pixels silicon tracker, (large pixels / short strips) fine grained (PFA) calorimetry, 1 + 7.5 Λi, Si-W ECAL, Sc-FE HCAL superconducting solenoid, 4 Tesla return yoke (Fe) with muon-ID detectors forward region with compact forward calorimeters Note: final beam focusing is outside the detector end-coils for field shaping

11.4 m

71

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Project staging

72

Optimize machine design w.r.t. cost and power for a staged approach to reach multi-TeV scales: ~ 380 GeV (optimised for Higgs + top physics) ~ 1500 GeV ~ 3000 GeV Adapting appropriately to LHC + other physics findings Possibility for first physics no later than 2035 Project Plan to include accelerator, detector, physics

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Updated baseline

73

CERN-2016-004

arXiv:1608.07537

slide-74
SLIDE 74

74

slide-75
SLIDE 75

75

CLIC layout 380 GeV

slide-76
SLIDE 76

76

slide-77
SLIDE 77

CLIC staged run model

77

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Key technical challenges

78

  • High-current drive beam bunched at 12 GHz
  • Power transfer + main-beam acceleration
  • 100 MV/m gradient in main-beam cavities
  • Produce, transport + collide low-emittance beams
  • System integration, engineering, cost, power …
slide-79
SLIDE 79

CLIC Test Facility (CTF3)

79

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Status

80

  • Produced high-current drive beam bunched at 12 GHz

28A

3 GHz x2 x3 12 GHz

Arrival time stabilised to 50 fs

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Status

81

  • Demonstrated two-beam acceleration

31 MeV = 145 MV/m

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Status

82

  • Achieved 100 MV/m gradient in main-beam RF cavities
slide-83
SLIDE 83

Key technical challenges

83

  • High-current drive beam bunched at 12 GHz
  • Power transfer + main-beam acceleration
  • 100 MV/m gradient in main-beam cavities

 Industrialisation of 12 GHz RF/structure technologies  Application to medium- and large-scale systems

slide-84
SLIDE 84

SwissFEL

84

  • 104 x 2m-long C-band structures

(beam  6 GeV @ 100 Hz)

  • Similar um-level tolerances
  • Length ~ 800 CLIC structures
slide-85
SLIDE 85

CompactLight – EU H2020 design study for a compact XFEL based on X-band structures

Approved by EC! Project start 1/1/18

1

  • (Coordinator) Elettra

– Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A. Italy 2 CERN

  • European

Organization for Nuclear Research

  • International

3 STFC – Daresbury Laboratory UK 4 SINAP, Chinese Academy

  • f

Sciences

  • China

5 Institute

  • f

Accelerating Systems and Applications Greece 6 Uppsala Universitet Sweden 7 The University

  • f

Melbourne Australia 8 Australian Nuclear Science and Tecnology Organisation Australia 9 Ankara University Institute

  • f

Accelerator Technologies Turkey 10 Lancaster University UK 11 VDL Enabling Technology Group Eindhoven BV Netherlands 12 Technische Universiteit Eindhoven Netherlands 13 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Italy 14 Kyma S.r.l. Italy 15 University

  • f

Rome "La Sapienza" Italy 16 Italian National agency for new technologies, Energy and sustainable economic development, ENEA Italy 17 Consorcio para la Construccion Equipamiento y Explotacion del Laboratorio de Luz Sincrotron Spain 18 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CNRS France 19 Karlsruher Instritut für Technologie Germany 20 Paul Scherrer Institut PSI Switzerland 21

Agencia Estatal Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicias

Spain 22

University

  • f

Helsinki

  • Helsinki

Institute

  • f

Physics

Finland 23 Pulsar Physics Netherlands 24 VU University Amsterdam Netherlands Third Parties Third party’s

  • rganisation

name Country

  • Universitetet

i Oslo

  • University
  • f

Oslo Norway

  • Advanced

Research Center for Nanolithography (JRU

  • f

VU) Netherlands

slide-86
SLIDE 86

CLIC project preparation

86

  • Preparing CLIC Project Plan + supporting documents for

input to European Strategy Update (ESU)

  • Staged approach, starting at 380 GeV with costs and

power not excessive compared with LHC

  • Upgrade path in stages over 20-30 year horizon  3 TeV
  • Update costings, for both baseline and a klystron-based

380 GeV first stage

  • Maintain flexibility and align with LHC physics outcomes
  • Next step > 2020 is a ~5-year project preparation phase:

critical parameters, detailed site layout, value engineering, risk mitigation …  plans to be presented to ESU

slide-87
SLIDE 87

CLIC roadmap

slide-88
SLIDE 88

88

CLIC workshop 2018

slide-89
SLIDE 89

PPAP recommendation

‘It is essential that the UK engages with the Higgs Factory initiative and positions itself to play a leading role should the facility go ahead.’

89

slide-90
SLIDE 90

90

Extra material follows

slide-91
SLIDE 91

91

‘Higgs factory’

  • e+e- collider:

linear collider storage ring

  • photon-photon collider:

usually considered as add-on to linear collider

  • muon collider:

usually considered as a next step beyond a future neutrino factory

slide-92
SLIDE 92

92

Snowmass executive summary 2013

Compelling science motivates continuing this program with experiments at lepton colliders. Experiments at such colliders can reach sub-percent precision in Higgs boson properties in a unique, model-independent way, enabling discovery of percent-level deviations from the Standard Model predicted in many theories.

slide-93
SLIDE 93

93

Snowmass executive summary 2013

Compelling science motivates continuing this program with experiments at lepton colliders. Experiments at such colliders can reach sub-percent precision in Higgs boson properties in a unique, model-independent way, enabling discovery of percent-level deviations from the Standard Model predicted in many theories. They can improve the precision of our knowledge of the W, Z, and top quark well enough to allow the discovery of predicted new-physics effects. They search for new particles in a manner complementing new particle searches at the LHC.

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Snowmass executive summary 2013

Compelling science motivates continuing this program with experiments at lepton colliders. Experiments at such colliders can reach sub-percent precision in Higgs boson properties in a unique, model-independent way, enabling discovery of percent-level deviations from the Standard Model predicted in many theories. They can improve the precision of our knowledge of the W, Z, and top quark well enough to allow the discovery of predicted new-physics effects. They search for new particles in a manner complementing new particle searches at the LHC. A global effort has completed the technical design of the International Linear Collider (ILC) accelerator and detectors that will provide these capabilities in the latter part of the next decade. The Japanese particle physics community has declared this facility as its first priority for new initiatives.

slide-95
SLIDE 95

95

g/ e+e- annihilations

E E

slide-96
SLIDE 96

96

g/ e+e- annihilations

2E > 160 GeV

E E

slide-97
SLIDE 97

97

g/ e+e- annihilations

2E > 182 GeV

E E

slide-98
SLIDE 98

98

e+e- annihilations

2E > 216 GeV

E E

slide-99
SLIDE 99

99

g/ e+e- annihilations

2E > 350 GeV

E E

slide-100
SLIDE 100

100

g/ e+e- annihilations

???

E E

slide-101
SLIDE 101

101

Model-independent couplings

slide-102
SLIDE 102

KEK-ILC Action Plan

KEK-DG Yamauchi set up a WG to develop a KEK-ILC action plan in May, 2015. The KEK-ILC Action Plan was released in January 2016. It contains technical preparation tasks and a human resource development plan for the pre-preparation phase (current efforts) and the main-preparation phase (after “green sign” from MEXT). It focuses mainly on a development plan for KEK. “Producing a EAP (European Action Plan) for the ILC in timely manner is very important.” “After having established a discussion group with DOE, discussions with Europe are likely to become the next important topic for MEXT.”

102

Extracted from slides of Y.Okada, KEK – EJADE meeting 6.9.16

E-JADE

Europe-Japan Accelerator Development Exchange Programme Technical WPs: WP1: LHC with upgrades/FFC/ SuperKEKb, WP2: ATF2, WP3: ILC/CLIC Partners: CERN (coord), DESY, CEA, CNRS, CSIC, RHUL, OXF with Uni. Tokyo and KEK -> WG for EAP New partners: VINCA, AGH-Cracow, Tel Aviv University, Liverpool University, Université de Strasbourg, Université Paris-Sud, Tohoku University and Kyushu University. Authors of EAP: For EJADE institutes: CERN: S.Stapnes, CEA: O.Napoli, DESY: N.Walker/H.Weise/B.List, CNRS: P.Bambade/A.Jeremi, UK: P.Burrows, CSIC: A.Faust-Golfe EJADE WP3 and centrally: T.Schoerner-Sadenius, M. Stanitzki TDR: B.Foster

Programme 2015-2018:

  • Three main technical WPs
  • Supports extended stays of European Researchers

in Japan

  • Recently adapted to include detector and physics

studies for ILC (new partners) On the European side it was suggested to use the EJADE H2020 MC project to prepare the EAP – the effort was started October 2016

slide-103
SLIDE 103

103

European X-FEL at DESY

slide-104
SLIDE 104

2017–2018: Pre-preparation phase

The on-going activities with relevance to the ILC in Europe are reviewed.

2019–2022: Preparation phase

This period needs to be initiated by a positive statement from the Japanese government about hosting the ILC, followed by a European strategy update that ranks European participation in the ILC as a high-priority item. The preparation phase focuses on preparation for construction and agreement on the definition of deliverables and their allocation to regions.

2023 and beyond: Construction phase

The construction phase will start after the ILC laboratory has been established and inter- governmental agreements are in place. At the current stage, only the existing capabilities of the European groups relevant for this phase can be described.

ILC Project Phases

slide-105
SLIDE 105

105

Linear Colliders for electrons + positrons

Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (California)

slide-106
SLIDE 106

106

main linac bunch compressor damping ring source pre-accelerator collimation final focus IP extraction & dump KeV few GeV few GeV few GeV 250-500 GeV

Designing a Linear Collider

slide-107
SLIDE 107

CLIC Higgs coupling capabilities

107

slide-108
SLIDE 108

CLIC Higgs-top + self couplings

108

Higgs couplings to heavy particles benefit from higher c.m. energies:

ttH ~ 4% HH ~ 20%

slide-109
SLIDE 109

CLIC top physics: examples

109

Also CLIC BSM Physics study group

Omnibus CLIC top paper in preparation, for ~ end 2017

Anomalous couplings Threshold scan