Update on Fungicide Resistance Research and New Implications for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

update on fungicide resistance research and new
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Update on Fungicide Resistance Research and New Implications for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Update on Fungicide Resistance Research and New Implications for Scab Management Katherine L. Stevenson Fungicides for Pecan Disease Management Class FRAC Resistance Risk group MBCs 1 High DMIs 3 Medium QoIs 11 High Organotins 30


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Update on Fungicide Resistance Research and New Implications for Scab Management

Katherine L. Stevenson

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Fungicides for Pecan Disease Management

Class FRAC group Resistance Risk MBCs 1 High DMIs 3 Medium QoIs 11 High Organotins 30 Low to Medium Phosphonates 33 Low Guanidines U12 Low to Medium

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Pecan South, March 1976 Pecan South, June 1977

UGA Plant Pathologist, R. H. Littrell, reports benomyl resistance

slide-4
SLIDE 4

History of Fungicide Resistance in Pecan Scab

MBC fungicides

  • resistance to benomyl (Benlate) reported in mid-

1970s in Georgia

  • use of thiophanate-methyl (Topsin M), has increased

in the last 7-8 years

  • both products share the same mode of action and

have a high risk of resistance

  • cross resistance is common
slide-5
SLIDE 5

History of Fungicide Resistance in Pecan Scab

DMI fungicides

  • significant decrease in sensitivity to DMI fungicides

propiconazole (Orbit) and fenbuconazole (Enable) 1995-2003 associated with reduced scab control

5 10

N u m b e r

  • f

i s

  • l

a t e s

5 10 15 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Orchard 5 n=59 Orchard 5 n=50 1995 M ean RG=62.1% 2003 M ean RG=90.0%

Mean relative growth on 0.2 μg/ml propiconazole (%)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

History of Fungicide Resistance in Pecan Scab

Organotin fungicides

  • significant shifts in sensitivity to fentin hydroxide

(TPTH) detected in 1998, reduced efficacy reported, but no control failures

more sensitive less sensitive Log EC50 Value (μg/ml)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Testing for Sensitivity to Fungicides

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Fungicide Sensitivity Monitoring 2008-2015

  • Fungicide sensitivity monitoring was offered as a

service to growers in Georgia

  • Growers submitted samples for testing and received a

report of the results by email Year Samples tested 2008 33 2014 179 2015 78

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Fungicides Included in the Sensitivity Tests

FRAC code “At-risk” Fungicide Concentration (μg/ml)

30 Fentin hydroxide (Super Tin, Agri Tin) 30 1 Thiophanate-methyl (Topsin M) 1 U12 Dodine (Elast) 3 3 Propiconazole (Orbit, Propimax, etc.) 1 3 Tebuconazole (Orius, Tebuzol, etc.) 1 3 Difenoconazole (Quadris Top*) 1

* mixture of azoxystrobin and difenoconazole

slide-10
SLIDE 10

% spore germination % micro-colony growth

95 μm

Testing for Sensitivity to Fungicides

slide-11
SLIDE 11

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 None Low Medium High

% of samples Level of insensitivity

2008 2014 2015 RG 0% 0 – 40% 40 – 70% ≥ 70%

Insensitivity to Fentin Hydroxide

slide-12
SLIDE 12

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 None Low Medium High

% of samples Level of insensitivity

2008 2014 2015 RG 0% 0 – 40% 40 – 70% ≥ 70%

Insensitivity to Propiconazole

slide-13
SLIDE 13

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 None Low Medium High

% of samples Level of insensitivity

Propiconazole Difenoconazole RG 0% 0 – 40% 40 – 70% ≥ 70%

Insensitivity to DMIs

slide-14
SLIDE 14

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 None Low Medium High

% of samples Level of insensitivity

2008 2014 2015 RG 0% 0 – 40% 40 – 70% ≥ 70%

Insensitivity to Dodine

slide-15
SLIDE 15

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 None Low Medium High

% of samples Level of insensitivity

2008 2014 2015 RG 0% 0 – 40% 40 – 70% ≥ 70%

Insensitivity to Thiophanate-methyl

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Risk of Resistance to QoI Fungicides*

  • The rapid assay method is not accurate for QoI

fungicides (strobilurins)

  • Cytochrome b is essential for fungal respiration and is

the target of QoI fungicide activity

  • Mutations in the cytochrome b gene are known

mechanisms of QoI resistance G143A common, complete resistance to QoIs F129L not common, partial resistance to QoIs G137R not common, partial resistance to QoIs

* azoxystrobin (Abound), pyraclostrobin (Headline), kresoxim- methyl (Sovran)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Risk of Resistance to QoI Fungicides

  • a test was designed to look for mutations in a small

section of the cytochrome b gene that included the known mutation sites

  • 125 isolates of the scab fungus were tested
  • no mutations found at positions 129 or 143
  • a new mutation found at position 137 in 7 isolates; the

effect of this mutation on sensitivity to QoIs is unknown, but is currently being investigated

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Risk of Resistance to QoI Fungicides

  • two non-coding regions of DNA (introns) were detected

in all 125 isolates

  • location of the large intron next to position 143 renders

a mutation at this position lethal, thus preventing complete resistance to QoIs

  • presence of this intron in all 125 isolates suggests that

the risk of complete resistance to QoIs is low for the pecan scab fungus (very good news!!)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

What Does It Mean for Scab Management?

  • Field study to determine effect of reduced sensitivity on

fungicide efficacy for scab control

  • 10 consecutive applications, 14-day intervals
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Maximum Leaf Scab Incidence

  • Max. leaf scab incidence (%)

ab bc d d cd a

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Nut Scab Severity*

Nut scab severity (%)

100 80 60 40 20

b a d cd bc a

* on Sep 15 2016

slide-22
SLIDE 22

TPTH – Scab Incidence vs. Insensitivity*

Incidence or insensitivity (%)

May 19 May 29 Jun 8 Jun 18 Jun 28 Jul 8 Jul 18 Jul 28 * insensitivity to TPTH at 30 µg/ml

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Tebuconazole – Scab Incidence vs. Insensitivity*

Incidence or insensitivity (%)

May 19 May 29 Jun 8 Jun 18 Jun 28 Jul 8 Jul 18 Jul 28 * insensitivity to tebuconazole at 1.0 µg/ml

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Implications for Scab Management

  • Insensitivity to TPTH, propiconazole and tebuconazole is

common in Georgia pecan orchards

  • Some insensitivity to dodine, but increasing slowly
  • Among the DMIs, difenoconazole remains effective,

even in locations where reduced sensitivity to propiconazole or tebuconazole has been detected

  • Thiophanate-methyl (Topsin) should be used very

cautiously; no more than 1 or 2 applications per season; high levels of resistance can build up very quickly

  • Low risk of complete resistance to QoI fungicides in the

scab fungus

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Implications for Scab Management

  • When insensitivity to TPTH was 0-15%, no significant

control of scab with TPTH

  • When insensitivity to tebuconazole was 50-70%, control
  • f scab with tebuconazole was inadequate
  • Tank mix of TPTH + tebuconazole provided significantly

better scab control than either product alone

  • Azoxystrobin provided consistently good scab control,

significantly better than other treatments; consistent with predicted low resistance risk for the scab fungus

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Resistance Management More Important Than Ever!

  • Alternate or tank-mix fungicides with different modes of

action (different FRAC codes: 1, 3, 7, 11, 30, 33, U12)

  • Select fungicides and time applications to maximize

effectiveness

  • Use non-chemical disease management practices to

reduce need for fungicides (tree thinning, limb pruning, hedging, scab-resistant cultivars, etc.)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Acknowledgments

  • Tim Brenneman
  • Jason Brock
  • Clive Bock
  • Murat Seyran
  • Jeff Standish
  • Lara Lee Hickman
  • Ethan McBrayer
  • Auburn Diffie
  • Faith Anderson
  • Andrew McInnes
  • Tyler Snow
  • Marianna Kastberg-Leonard

The Georgia Agricultural Commodity Commission for Pecans

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Thank you!